Literature DB >> 29119356

Test Performance Variation Between Settings and Populations.

Blase Gambino1.   

Abstract

The present paper is the third in a series on the evaluation of new tests designed to detect the disordered gambler. The present paper has two objectives. First, the observed variation in test performance between settings and populations is described in general terms and an explanation of the observed variation is presented in terms of what is referred to as spectrum effects. Second the expected variation in test performance between settings and populations is illustrated with several examples and the implications emphasized for the purpose of test evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confidence intervals; Populations; Settings; Test performance; Test uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29119356     DOI: 10.1007/s10899-017-9728-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gambl Stud        ISSN: 1050-5350


  54 in total

Review 1.  The South Oaks Gambling Screen: a review with reference to Australian use.

Authors:  Malcolm W Battersby; Lyndall J Thomas; Barry Tolchard; Adrian Esterman
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2002

2.  Prevalence rates of youth gambling problems: are the current rates inflated?

Authors:  Jeffrey L Derevensky; Rina Gupta; Ken Winters
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2003

3.  Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation.

Authors:  Stephanie A Mulherin; William C Miller
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  The correction for bias in prevalence estimation with screening tests.

Authors:  B Gambino
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  1997

Review 5.  The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics.

Authors:  Thomas A Lasko; Jui G Bhagwat; Kelly H Zou; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  The development of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders version V substance use disorders section: establishing the research framework.

Authors:  John B Saunders; Linda B Cottler
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 7.  Reliability of Instruments Measuring At-Risk and Problem Gambling Among Young Individuals: A Systematic Review Covering Years 2009-2015.

Authors:  Robert Edgren; Sari Castrén; Marjukka Mäkelä; Pia Pörtfors; Hannu Alho; Anne H Salonen
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  Validation of the lie/bet screen for pathological gambling on two normal population data sets.

Authors:  K Gunnar Götestam; Agneta Johansson; Hanne Gro Wenzel; Inge-Ernald Simonsen
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2004-12

9.  Evaluation of brief screens for gambling disorder in the substance use treatment setting.

Authors:  Seth S Himelhoch; Haley Miles-McLean; Deborah R Medoff; Julie Kreyenbuhl; Loreen Rugle; Marie Bailey-Kloch; Wendy Potts; Christopher Welsh; Julie Brownley
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2015-05-12

10.  Which Diagnostic Criteria are Most Useful in Discriminating Between Social Gamblers and Individuals with Gambling Problems? An Examination of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criteria.

Authors:  Caroline E Temcheff; Thomas S Paskus; Marc N Potenza; Jeffrey L Derevensky
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2016-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.