Literature DB >> 12375383

The South Oaks Gambling Screen: a review with reference to Australian use.

Malcolm W Battersby1, Lyndall J Thomas, Barry Tolchard, Adrian Esterman.   

Abstract

The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) is a psychometric instrument widely used internationally to assess the presence of pathological gambling. Developed by Lesieur and Blume (1987) in the United States of America (USA) as a self-rated screening instrument, it is based on DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria. This paper describes the origins and psychometric development of the SOGS and comments critically in relation to its construct validity and cutoff scores. Reference is made to the use of the SOGS in the Australian setting, where historically gambling has been a widely accepted part of the culture, corresponding to one of the highest rates of legaliZed gambling and gambling expenditure in the world. An alternative approach to the development of an instrument to detect people who have problems in relation to gambling is proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12375383     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016895221871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gambl Stud        ISSN: 1050-5350


  25 in total

1.  Prevalence of problem gambling: a replication study 7 years later.

Authors:  R Ladouceur; C Jacques; F Ferland; I Giroux
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).

Authors:  Randy Stinchfield
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Estimating the extent and degree of Gambling related problems in the Australian population: A national survey.

Authors:  M G Dickerson; E Baron; S M Hong; D Cottrell
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  1996-06

4.  Epidemiological surveys of pathological gambling: Critique and suggestions for modification.

Authors:  H R Lesieur
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  1994-12

5.  Impulsivity in pathological gambling: the antisocial impulsivist.

Authors:  A Blaszczynski; Z Steel; N McConaghy
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Refining prevalence estimates of pathological gambling.

Authors:  R A Volberg; H J Steadman
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.

Authors:  H R Lesieur; S B Blume
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Substance abuse, pathological gambling, and impulsiveness.

Authors:  N M Petry
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Pathological gamblers are neither impulsive nor sensation-seekers.

Authors:  C C Allcock; D M Grace
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.744

10.  Evaluation of patients treated for pathological gambling in a combined alcohol, substance abuse and pathological gambling treatment unit using the Addiction Severity Index.

Authors:  H R Lesieur; S B Blume
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1991-08
View more
  15 in total

1.  The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: an evaluation of the scale and its accompanying profiler software in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Matthew M Young; Michael J A Wohl
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2011-09

Review 2.  GPs and problem gambling: can they help with identification and early intervention?

Authors:  Barry Tolchard; Lyndall Thomas; Malcolm Battersby
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2007-04-24

3.  SOGS and CGPI: parallel comparison on a diverse population.

Authors:  Martin Young; Matthew Stevens
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2008-03-08

4.  The Victorian Gambling Screen: reliability and validation in a clinical population.

Authors:  B Tolchard; M W Battersby
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2010-12

5.  Setting criterion thresholds for estimating prevalence: what is being validated?

Authors:  Blase Gambino
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2014-09

6.  Test Performance Variation Between Settings and Populations.

Authors:  Blase Gambino
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2018-12

7.  Metacognitions in problem gambling.

Authors:  Annika Lindberg; Bruce A Fernie; Marcantonio M Spada
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2011-03

8.  Gambling screens: does shortening the time frame affect their psychometric properties?

Authors:  Edelgard Wulfert; Julie Hartley; Marlene Lee; Naitian Wang; Christine Franco; Ruthlyn Sodano
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2005

9.  Reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a Brazilian sample.

Authors:  Maria Paula Magalhães Tavares de Oliveira; Dartiu Xavier da Silveira; Simone Villas Boas de Carvalho; Silvia Teresa Collakis; Juliana Bizeto; Maria Teresa Araujo Silva
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2009-09-23

10.  Cognitive status of patients with Parkinson's disease and pathological gambling.

Authors:  Chiara Siri; Roberto Cilia; Danilo De Gaspari; Margherita Canesi; Nicoletta Meucci; Anna Lena Zecchinelli; Gianni Pezzoli; Angelo Antonini
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.