Literature DB >> 29119314

Trait-specific long-term consequences of genomic selection in beef cattle.

Haroldo Henrique de Rezende Neves1,2, Roberto Carvalheiro1, Sandra Aidar de Queiroz3.   

Abstract

Simulation studies allow addressing consequences of selection schemes, helping to identify effective strategies to enable genetic gain and maintain genetic diversity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term impact of genomic selection (GS) in genetic progress and genetic diversity of beef cattle. Forward-in-time simulation generated a population with pattern of linkage disequilibrium close to that previously reported for real beef cattle populations. Different scenarios of GS and traditional pedigree-based BLUP (PBLUP) selection were simulated for 15 generations, mimicking selection for female reproduction and meat quality. For GS scenarios, an alternative selection criterion was simulated (wGBLUP), intended to enhance long-term gains by attributing more weight to favorable alleles with low frequency. GS allowed genetic progress up to 40% greater than PBLUP, for female reproduction and meat quality. The alternative criterion wGBLUP did not increase long-term response, although allowed reducing inbreeding rates and loss of favorable alleles. The results suggest that GS outperforms PBLUP when the selected trait is under less polygenic background and that attributing more weight to low-frequency favorable alleles can reduce inbreeding rates and loss of favorable alleles in GS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Female reproduction; Low-frequency alleles; Meat quality; Simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29119314     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-017-9999-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  28 in total

1.  The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Beatriz Villanueva; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory.

Authors:  J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  QMSim: a large-scale genome simulator for livestock.

Authors:  Mehdi Sargolzaei; Flavio S Schenkel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Extent of linkage disequilibrium in Holstein cattle in North America.

Authors:  M Sargolzaei; F S Schenkel; G B Jansen; L R Schaeffer
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 6.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P J Bowman; A J Chamberlain; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation.

Authors:  Samuel A Clark; John M Hickey; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Accuracy of genomic selection in simulated populations mimicking the extent of linkage disequilibrium in beef cattle.

Authors:  Fernanda V Brito; José Braccini Neto; Mehdi Sargolzaei; Jaime A Cobuci; Flavio S Schenkel
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Assessment of alternative genotyping strategies to maximize imputation accuracy at minimal cost.

Authors:  Yijian Huang; John M Hickey; Matthew A Cleveland; Christian Maltecca
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  A comparison of statistical methods for genomic selection in a mice population.

Authors:  Haroldo H R Neves; Roberto Carvalheiro; Sandra A Queiroz
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.