Literature DB >> 29119283

Pudendal nerve injury is a relatively common but transient complication of hip arthroscopy.

Anthony Habib1, Chloe E Haldane2, Seper Ekhtiari2, Darren de Sa1, Nicole Simunovic3, Etienne L Belzile4, Olufemi R Ayeni5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hip arthroscopy is emerging as the standard of care for conditions involving the hip, and has a unique set of complications. The purpose of this review was to identify (1) the crude rate of pudendal nerve injury following hip arthroscopy and (2) the specific factors leading to pudendal nerve injury.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched from database inception to October 2016. Patient demographics, indications, surgical technique, complication rates, treatment approaches, and rehabilitation strategies were extracted.
RESULTS: Twenty-four studies (n = 3405) were included, with the majority (66%) of studies being level IV evidence. The mean age was 33.9 ± 9.7 years (range 12-78) and 48.2% were males. Average follow-up was 30.2 ± 19.1 months. 62 patients were reported to have sustained pudendal nerve injury (1.8%) post-operatively, and all resolved within 6 weeks to 3 months. Of the seven studies that reported using a perineal post, 20 patients were diagnosed with pudendal nerve injury (4.3%), in contrast to two studies (189 patients) reporting only 0.5% pudendal nerve injury without the use of perineal post. Two studies commented on time of traction during surgical intervention with mean times of 98 and 68 min with complication rates of 10% and 6.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Pudendal nerve injury is not uncommon following hip arthroscopy, with a reported rate found in this review of 1.8%. Potential risk factors may include the use of a perineal post and long traction times. All reported cases resolved within 3 months. Patients should be informed of complications related to pudendal nerve injury, which include sexual and urinary dysfunction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level I-IV studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip arthroscopy; Post-operative complications; Pudendal neuralgia; Sexual function

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29119283     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4783-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  34 in total

1.  [Arthroscopically-assisted procedures on the hip joint].

Authors:  P Nepraš; J Matějka; P Zeman; J Kudela
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.531

Review 2.  Traction table-related complications in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Michael A Flierl; Philip F Stahel; David J Hak; Steven J Morgan; Wade R Smith
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Risk of sciatic nerve traction injury during hip arthroscopy—is it the amount or duration? An intraoperative nerve monitoring study.

Authors:  Jessica J M Telleria; Marc R Safran; Alex H S Harris; John N Gardi; James M Glick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Efficacy of hip arthroscopy in the management of synovial chondromatosis.

Authors:  Anthony Marchie; Ian Panuncialman; Joseph C McCarthy
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Hip arthroscopy in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Rahul Mandiga; Patrick Siparsky; Lyle J Micheli; James R Kasser
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  Arthroscopic extirpation of an osteoid osteoma of the acetabulum.

Authors:  M S Alvarez; P R Moneo; J A Palacios
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  A matched-pair controlled study of microfracture of the hip with average 2-year follow-up: do full-thickness chondral defects portend an inferior prognosis in hip arthroscopy?

Authors:  Benjamin G Domb; John M Redmond; Kevin F Dunne; Christine E Stake; Asheesh Gupta
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Learning curve of basic hip arthroscopy technique: CUSUM analysis.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Deuk-Soo Hwang; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Pudendal nerve palsy following fracture table traction.

Authors:  M P France; B F Aurori
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Pudendal nerve neuralgia after hip arthroscopy: retrospective study and literature review.

Authors:  R Pailhé; P Chiron; N Reina; E Cavaignac; V Lafontan; J-M Laffosse
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 2.256

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sexual and urinary function post-surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: experience from the FIRST trial and embedded cohort study.

Authors:  Pierre-Olivier Jean; Nicole Simunovic; Andrew Duong; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2022-01-21

Review 2.  The impact of acetabular labral tears on sexual activity in women.

Authors:  Shruti Raut; Jessica Kamal; Alan Norrish; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2019-12-31

3.  The Hip Arthroscopy Post-less Procedure Impingement (HAPPI) Technique: Achieving Distraction With Standard Hip Tables at Zero Additional Cost.

Authors:  Megan L Jimenez; Masahiko Haneda; Cecilia Pascual-Garrido
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2020-11-11

4.  Abdominal compartment syndrome after hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Aline Schwenter; Guido Schuepfer; Martin Beck; Jacqueline Mauch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Limitations of Postless Hip Arthroscopy for a Patient with Coxa Profunda: A Case Report.

Authors:  Wendy M Meek; Paul F Abraham; Michael P Kucharik; Scott D Martin
Journal:  JBJS Case Connect       Date:  2021-03-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.