Literature DB >> 23052834

Risk of sciatic nerve traction injury during hip arthroscopy—is it the amount or duration? An intraoperative nerve monitoring study.

Jessica J M Telleria1, Marc R Safran, Alex H S Harris, John N Gardi, James M Glick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Using intraoperative nerve monitoring we prospectively studied the prevalence, pattern, and predisposing factors for sciatic nerve traction injury during hip arthroscopy.
METHODS: The transcranial motor (tcMEP) and/or somatosensory (SSEP) evoked potentials of seventy-six patients undergoing hip arthroscopy in the lateral position were recorded. Changes in the posterior tibial and common peroneal nerves were evaluated to assess the effects of the amount and duration of traction on nerve function. Sixteen subjects were excluded because of incomplete data. Nerve dysfunction was defined as a 50% reduction in the amplitude of SSEPs or tcMEPs or a 10% increase in the latency of the SSEPs; nerve injury was defined as a clinically apparent sensory or motor deficit. Traction time and weight were continuously monitored with use of a custom foot-plate tensiometer.
RESULTS: Of sixty patients (thirty-one female and twenty-nine male, with a mean age of thirty-seven years [range, sixteen to sixty-one years]), thirty-five (58%) had intraoperative nerve dysfunction and four (7%) sustained a clinical nerve injury. The average maximum traction weight (and standard deviation) for patients who did and those who did not have nerve dysfunction or injury was 38.1 ± 7.8 kg (range, 22.7 to 56.7 kg) and 32.9 ± 7.9 kg (range, 22.7 to 45.4 kg), respectively. The odds of a nerve event increased 4% with every 0.45-kg (1-lb) increase in the traction amount (age/sex-adjusted; p=0.043; odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.08). The average total traction time for patients who did and those who did not have nerve dysfunction was 95.9 ± 41.9 minutes (range, forty-two to 240 minutes) and 82.3 ± 35.4 minutes (range, thirty-eight to 160 minutes), respectively, and an increase in traction time did not increase the odds of a nerve event (p = 0.201). Age and sex were not significant risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of nerve changes seen with monitoring of SSEPs and tcMEPs is greater than what is clinically identified. The maximum traction weight, not the total traction time, is the greatest risk factor for sciatic nerve dysfunction during hip arthroscopy. This study did not identify a discrete threshold of traction weight or traction time that increased the odds of nerve dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23052834     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  19 in total

1.  Intraoperative neuromonitoring of anterior root muscle response during hip surgery under spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Pınar Yalınay Dikmen; V Emre Ozden; Goksel Dikmen; Elif Ilgaz Aydınlar; I Remzi Tozun
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Basic Hip Arthroscopy: Supine Patient Positioning and Dynamic Fluoroscopic Evaluation.

Authors:  Sandeep Mannava; Elizabeth A Howse; Austin V Stone; Allston J Stubbs
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-08-24

Review 3.  Hip arthroscopy complications regarding surgery and early postoperative care: retrospective study and review of literature.

Authors:  R Seijas; O Ares; A Sallent; X Cuscó; P Álvarez-Díaz; R Tejedor; R Cugat
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-12-07

4.  Hip arthroscopy: from the beginning to the future--an innovator's perspective.

Authors:  James M Glick; Frank Valone; Marc R Safran
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Hip labral repair: options and outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua D Harris
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

6.  Chiropractic Management of a Patient With Perineal Numbness After Arthroscopic Hip Surgery: A Case Report.

Authors:  Harold M Olson; Andrew J Zetocha; Courtney A Olson
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-10-13

7.  Hip arthroscopy with initial access to the peripheral compartment provides significant improvement in FAI patients.

Authors:  Pedro Dantas; Sérgio Gonçalves; Vasco Mascarenhas; Antonio Camporese; Oliver Marin-Peña
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Hip arthroscopy for challenging deformities: global pincer femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Dean K Matsuda; Nikhil Gupta; Dylan Hanami
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2014-02-27

Review 9.  Pudendal nerve injury is a relatively common but transient complication of hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Anthony Habib; Chloe E Haldane; Seper Ekhtiari; Darren de Sa; Nicole Simunovic; Etienne L Belzile; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Intra-articular Fluid Distension for Initial Portal Placement During Hip Arthroscopy: The "Femoral Head Drop" Technique.

Authors:  Kyle Alpaugh; Sangmin R Shin; Scott D Martin
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-01-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.