Literature DB >> 29118266

The Effect of Message Content and Clinical Outcome on Patients' Perception of Physician Compassion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kimberson Tanco1, Ahsan Azhar2, Wadih Rhondali3, Alfredo Rodriguez-Nunez4, Diane Liu5, Jimin Wu5, Walter Baile6, Eduardo Bruera2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a previous randomized crossover study, patients perceived a physician delivering a more optimistic message (MO) as more compassionate and professional. However, the impact of the clinical outcome of the patient on patient's perception of physician's level of compassion and professionalism has not been previously studied. Our aim was to determine if the reported clinical outcome modified the patient's perception of physician compassion, professionalism, impression, and preference for physician.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight advanced cancer patients in an outpatient Supportive Care Center were randomized to complete validated questionnaires about patients' perception of physician's level of compassion, professionalism, impression, and preference of physician for themselves and their family after watching scripted videos depicting a physician delivering an MO versus a less optimistic (LO) message followed by a clinical vignette depicting a worse outcome.
RESULTS: Median age was 61 years and 55% were female. There was no difference in compassion score after the vignette in the MO and LO groups. However, there were significantly worse overall impression and professionalism scores in both the MO and LO groups after the vignette. In the MO group, preference for the physician for themselves and their family significantly decreased after the vignette.
CONCLUSION: Seeing a worse clinical outcome did not change the patients' appraisal of an inappropriately optimistic physician. However, it reduced the overall impression of both physicians that conveyed an MO or an LO message and it also resulted in less likelihood of choosing the MO physician for themselves and their family. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The study found that a patient's perception of a physician's compassion did not change after reading a vignette describing a negative clinical outcome, regardless of whether the physician had given a more or a less optimistic message to the patient. However, the results suggested that patients perceived worse professionalism and overall physician impression scores for both more and less optimistic physicians and lower likelihood to choose the more optimistic physician for themselves and their family. © AlphaMed Press 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Effect of clinical outcome; Impression of physician; Patient perception of physician; Physician compassion; Physician professionalism

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29118266      PMCID: PMC5905680          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  41 in total

1.  Measuring religious faith in cancer patients: reliability and construct validity of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith questionnaire.

Authors:  A C Sherman; S Simonton; D C Adams; U Latif; T G Plante; S K Burns; T Poling
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System as a screening tool for depression and anxiety.

Authors:  Ernesto Vignaroli; Ellen A Pace; Jie Willey; J Lynn Palmer; Tao Zhang; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 3.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, a proposed tool for distress screening in cancer patients: development and refinement.

Authors:  Sharon M Watanabe; Cheryl L Nekolaichuk; Crystal Beaumont
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  The inner life of physicians and care of the seriously ill.

Authors:  D E Meier; A L Back; R S Morrison
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-12-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Patient Perception of Physician Compassion After a More Optimistic vs a Less Optimistic Message: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kimberson Tanco; Wadih Rhondali; Pedro Perez-Cruz; Silvia Tanzi; Gary B Chisholm; Walter Baile; Susan Frisbee-Hume; Janet Williams; Charles Masino; Hilda Cantu; Amy Sisson; Joseph Arthur; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 31.777

6.  Impact of physician sitting versus standing during inpatient oncology consultations: patients' preference and perception of compassion and duration. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Florian Strasser; J Lynn Palmer; Jie Willey; Loren Shen; Ki Shin; Debra Sivesind; Estela Beale; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Overall patient satisfaction with hospitals: effects of patient-reported experiences and fulfilment of expectations.

Authors:  Oyvind A Bjertnaes; Ingeborg Strømseng Sjetne; Hilde Hestad Iversen
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Patients' expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer.

Authors:  Jane C Weeks; Paul J Catalano; Angel Cronin; Matthew D Finkelman; Jennifer W Mack; Nancy L Keating; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Patient-oncologist communication in advanced cancer: predictors of patient perception of prognosis.

Authors:  Tracy M Robinson; Stewart C Alexander; Margie Hays; Amy S Jeffreys; Maren K Olsen; Keri L Rodriguez; Kathryn I Pollak; Amy P Abernethy; Robert Arnold; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Deciding what information is necessary: do patients with advanced cancer want to know all the details?

Authors:  Bethany J Russell; Alicia M Ward
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.989

View more
  4 in total

1.  Challenging the Status Quo of Physician Attire in the Palliative Care Setting.

Authors:  Ahsan Azhar; Kimberson Tanco; Ali Haider; Minjeong Park; Diane Liu; Janet L Williams; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-02-19

Review 2.  Compassion in healthcare: an updated scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Sydney Malenfant; Priya Jaggi; K Alix Hayden; Shane Sinclair
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.113

3.  Compassion is a key quality for palliative care teams.

Authors:  Jung Hun Kang; Se Il Go; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  The COPE-Trial-Communicating prognosis to parents in the neonatal ICU: Optimistic vs. PEssimistic: study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial using two different scripted video vignettes to explore communication preferences of parents of preterm infants.

Authors:  Fiona A Forth; Florian Hammerle; Jochem König; Michael S Urschitz; Philipp Neuweiler; Eva Mildenberger; André Kidszun
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.