Literature DB >> 26181019

Patient Perception of Physician Compassion After a More Optimistic vs a Less Optimistic Message: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kimberson Tanco1, Wadih Rhondali2, Pedro Perez-Cruz3, Silvia Tanzi4, Gary B Chisholm5, Walter Baile6, Susan Frisbee-Hume1, Janet Williams1, Charles Masino1, Hilda Cantu1, Amy Sisson7, Joseph Arthur1, Eduardo Bruera1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Information regarding treatment options and prognosis is essential for patient decision making. Patient perception of physicians as being less compassionate when they deliver bad news might be a contributor to physicians' reluctance in delivering these types of communication.
OBJECTIVE: To compare patients' perception of physician compassion after watching video vignettes of 2 physicians conveying a more optimistic vs a less optimistic message, determine patients' physician preference after watching both videos, and establish demographic and clinical predictors of compassion. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial at an outpatient supportive care center in a cancer center in Houston, Texas, including English-speaking adult patients with advanced cancer who were able to understand the nature of the study and complete the consent process. Actors and patients were blinded to the purpose of the study. Investigators were blinded to the videos observed by the patient. INTERVENTION: One hundred patients were randomized to observe 2 standardized, roughly 4-minute videos depicting a physician discussing treatment information (more optimistic message vs less optimistic message) with a patient with advanced cancer. Both physicians made an identical number of empathetic statements (5) and displayed identical posture. After viewing each video, patients completed assessments including the Physician Compassion Questionnaire (0 = best, 50 = worst). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patients' perception of physician compassion after being exposed to a more optimistic vs an equally empathetic but less optimistic message.
RESULTS: Patients reported significantly better compassion scores after watching the more optimistic video as compared with the less optimistic video (median [interquartile range], 15 [5-23] vs 23 [10-31]; P < .001). There was a sequence effect favoring the second video on both compassion scores (P < .001) and physician preference (P < .001). Higher perception of compassion was found to be associated with greater trust in the medical profession independent of message type: 63 patients observing the more optimistic message ranked the physician as trustworthy vs 39 after the less optimistic message (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients perceived a higher level of compassion and preferred physicians who provided a more optimistic message. More research is needed in structuring less optimistic message content to support health care professionals in delivering less optimistic news. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02357108.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26181019     DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  38 in total

1.  Taboo Topics in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology: Strategies for Managing Challenging but Important Conversations Central to Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivorship.

Authors:  Giselle K Perez; John M Salsman; Kaitlyn Fladeboe; Anne C Kirchhoff; Elyse R Park; Abby R Rosenberg
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2020-03

2.  Challenging the Status Quo of Physician Attire in the Palliative Care Setting.

Authors:  Ahsan Azhar; Kimberson Tanco; Ali Haider; Minjeong Park; Diane Liu; Janet L Williams; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-02-19

Review 3.  Palliative care and advance care planning for pancreas and other cancers.

Authors:  Rajiv Agarwal; Andrew S Epstein
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06

4.  Papillary Thyroid Cancer: The Good and Bad of the "Good Cancer".

Authors:  Reese W Randle; Norah M Bushman; Jason Orne; Courtney J Balentine; Elizabeth Wendt; Megan Saucke; Susan C Pitt; Cameron L Macdonald; Nadine P Connor; Rebecca S Sippel
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 6.568

5.  Impact of Prognostic Discussions on the Patient-Physician Relationship: Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Paul R Duberstein; Richard L Kravitz; Guibo Xing; Daniel J Tancredi; Kevin Fiscella; Supriya Mohile; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Illness and end-of-life experiences of children with cancer who receive palliative care.

Authors:  Erica C Kaye; Courtney A Gushue; Samantha DeMarsh; Jonathan Jerkins; April Sykes; Zhaohua Lu; Jennifer M Snaman; Lindsay Blazin; Liza-Marie Johnson; Deena R Levine; R Ray Morrison; Justin N Baker
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 7.  Improving patient and caregiver outcomes in oncology: Team-based, timely, and targeted palliative care.

Authors:  David Hui; Breffni L Hannon; Camilla Zimmermann; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  What determines the timing of discussions on forgoing anticancer treatment? A national survey of medical oncologists.

Authors:  Masanori Mori; Chikako Shimizu; Asao Ogawa; Takuji Okusaka; Saran Yoshida; Tatsuya Morita
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  The Effect of Message Content and Clinical Outcome on Patients' Perception of Physician Compassion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kimberson Tanco; Ahsan Azhar; Wadih Rhondali; Alfredo Rodriguez-Nunez; Diane Liu; Jimin Wu; Walter Baile; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-11-08

Review 10.  Integrating palliative care into the trajectory of cancer care.

Authors:  David Hui; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.