| Literature DB >> 29117670 |
Yongju Shin1, Dongho Choi2, Kyeong Geun Lee2, Ho Soon Choi3, Yongsoon Park1.
Abstract
Background/Aims: After cholecystectomy, patients have reported postcholecystectomic syndromes such as abdominal symptoms, dyspepsia, and diarrhea, which suggest a relationship between cholecystectomic symptoms and diet, although the details of this association remain unclear. The present study investigated the hypothesis that dietary intake of nutrients and foods was significantly associated with postcholecystectomic syndromes.Entities:
Keywords: Follow-up studies; Gallstone; Postcholecystectomy syndrome; Diet
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29117670 PMCID: PMC6030420 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2016.223
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Intern Med ISSN: 1226-3303 Impact factor: 2.884
Characteristics of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients immediately postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy and 3 months after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
| Characteristic | Postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy | Three months after laparoscopic cholecystectomy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asymptomatic (n = 24) | Symptomatic (n = 35) | Asymptomatic (n = 32) | Symptomatic (n = 27) | |||
| Age, yr | 47.54 ± 12.34 | 50.31 ± 14.92 | 0.456 | 51.03 ± 11.56 | 47.67 ± 16.17 | 0.371 |
| Female sex | 11 (45.8) | 18 (51.4) | 0.673 | 14 (43.8) | 15 (55.6) | 0.366 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 25.73 ± 4.44 | 25.02 ± 3.04 | 0.471 | 25.65 ± 3.46 | 25.13 ± 3.88 | 0.585 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 92.33 ± 11.70 | 91.67 ± 11.31 | 0.828 | 88.05 ± 9.88 | 87.56 ± 9.74 | 0.849 |
| Family history of gallstones | 3 (12.5) | 6 (17.1) | 0.626 | 2 (6.3) | 5 (18.5) | 0.147 |
| Medical history of digestive system disease | 2 (8.3) | 11 (31.4) | 0.036 | 8 (25.0) | 8 (29.6) | 0.690 |
| Medication | 13 (54.2) | 20 (57.1) | 0.821 | 15 (46.9) | 10 (37.0) | 0.446 |
| Dieting for weight control | 8 (33.3) | 16 (45.7) | 0.342 | 2 (6.3) | 3 (11.1) | 0.504 |
| Exercise[ | 8 (33.3) | 18 (51.4) | 0.169 | 14 (43.8) | 16 (59.3) | 0.235 |
| 1–2 times/wk | 4 (50.0) | 5 (27.8) | 4 (28.6) | 5 (31.3) | ||
| 3–4 times/wk | 2 (25.0) | 8 (44.4) | 0.502 | 1 (7.1) | 8 (50.0) | 0.014 |
| ≥ 5–6 times/wk | 2 (25.0) | 5 (27.8) | 9 (64.3) | 3 (18.8) | ||
| Smoking | 3 (12.5) | 3 (8.6) | 0.624 | 4 (12.5) | 3 (11.1) | 0.869 |
| Drinking | 17 (70.8) | 21 (60.0) | 0.393 | 18 (56.3) | 12 (44.4) | 0.366 |
| Fatty liver | 14 (58.3) | 15 (42.9) | 0.243 | 19 (59.4) | 13 (50.0) | 0.475 |
| CBD diameter, mm | 4.35 ± 1.22 | 3.90 ± 1.26 | 0.185 | 4.91 ± 2.34 | 4.66 ± 1.95 | 0.663 |
| Change in CBD diameter, mm | - | - | - | 0.95 ± 2.19 | 0.40 ± 2.48 | 0.367 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD or number (%). p values were determined by independent t test for continuous variables, and the chi-square test for the categorical variables between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
CBD, common bile duct.
≥ 30 Minutes in one session.
Daily intake of nutrients and foods between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients 3 months after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
| Variable | Asymptomatic (n = 32) | Symptomatic (n = 27) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy, kcal | 1,716.97 ± 474.02 | 1,616.83 ± 657.49 | 0.500 |
| Carbohydrate, g/1,000 kcal | 155.07 ± 32.27 | 146.01 ± 36.22 | 0.314 |
| Lipid, g/1,000 kcal | 25.89 ± 10.84 | 25.98 ± 9.52 | 0.974 |
| Protein, g/1,000 kcal | 36.71 ± 8.60 | 42.85 ± 14.21 | 0.056 |
| Plant protein, g/1,000 kcal | 21.30 ± 6.63 | 19.70 ± 5.13 | 0.312 |
| Animal protein, g/1,000 kcal | 15.41 ± 10.07 | 23.15 ± 16.00 | 0.035 |
| Fiber, g/1,000 kcal | 14.03 ± 7.27 | 11.93 ± 4.38 | 0.194 |
| Cholesterol, mg/1,000 kcal | 136.51 ± 112.55 | 219.39 ± 153.25 | 0.020 |
| Grain, g | 272.28 ± 156.76 | 237.90 ± 183.00 | 0.440 |
| Potato, g | 36.71 ± 61.25 | 32.73 ± 66.27 | 0.812 |
| Vegetable, g | 324.12 ± 203.49 | 212.663 ± 134.13 | 0.018 |
| Fruit, g | 159.20 ± 130.76 | 221.71 ± 271.71 | 0.253 |
| Meat, g | 63.09 ± 77.03 | 91.03 ± 119.03 | 0.300 |
| Egg, g | 12.17 ± 19.17 | 35.91 ± 44.42 | 0.014 |
| Fish and seafood, g | 80.14 ± 132.95 | 63.82 ± 83.40 | 0.583 |
| Dairy product, g | 65.79 ± 92.73 | 79.61 ± 117.34 | 0.615 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD. p values were determined by independent t test.
Dietary habits between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients 3 months after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
| Variable | Asymptomatic (n = 32) | Symptomatic (n = 27) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breakfast consumer | 31 (96.9) | 23 (85.2) | 0.108 |
| Rice | 25 (80.6) | 12 (52.2) | |
| Potato | 0 | 2 (8.7) | |
| Bread | 0 | 5 (21.7) | 0.015 |
| Dairy | 3 (9.7) | 2 (8.7) | |
| Fruit and vegetable | 3 (9.7) | 2 (8.7) | |
| Food preferred | 5 (15.6) | 7 (25.9) | 0.327 |
| Potato | 0 | 1 (14.3) | |
| Fruit and vegetable | 5 (100.0) | 5 (71.4) | 1.000 |
| Seafood | 0 | 1 (14.3) | |
| Food avoided | 10 (31.3) | 16 (59.3) | 0.031 |
| Meat | 3 (30.0) | 4 (25.0) | |
| Oily food | 5 (50.0) | 9 (56.3) | |
| Seafood | 0 | 1 (6.3) | 0.388 |
| Alcohol | 2 (20.0) | 0 | |
| Other | 0 | 2 (12.5) |
Values are presented as number (%). p values were determinate by chi-square test for the categorical variables between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Association between dietary intake and the risk of symptoms 3 months after laparoscopic cholecystectomy by multivariable logistic regression analysis
| Variable | Quartile of dietary intake | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | ||
| Animal protein, g | 0.038 | |||
| Number of S/A | 7/11 | 6/12 | 14/9 | |
| Cut-off | ≤ 15.6 | 15.6 < to ≤ 37.0 | > 37.0 | |
| OR (95% CI)[ | 1 | 0.937 (0.19–4.68) | 4.411 (0.92–21.25) | |
| Cholesterol, mg | 0.041 | |||
| Number of S/A | 5/11 | 6/11 | 16/10 | |
| Cut-off | ≤ 133.4 | 133.4 < to ≤ 251.6 | > 251.6 | |
| OR (95% CI) | 1 | 1.497 (0.30–7.51) | 4.937 (1.04–23.48)[ | 0.022 |
| Vegetable, g | ||||
| Number of S/A | 16/10 | 8/11 | 3/11 | |
| Cut-off | ≤ 206.6 | 206.6 < to ≤ 385.7 | > 385.7 | |
| OR (95% CI) | 1 | 0.473 (0.12–1.80) | 0.125 (0.02–0.74)[ | |
| Egg, g | 0.023 | |||
| Number of S/A | 8/18 | 3/7 | 16/7 | |
| Cut-off | ≤ 0 | 0 < to ≤ 20 | > 20 | |
| OR (95% CI) | 1 | 1.046 (0.20–5.40) | 5.160 (1.28–20.87)[ | |
S/A, symptomatic patients/asymptomatic patients; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Estimates of p values for linear trend were based on linear scores derived from the medians of quartiles for intake of nutrients among asymptomatic patients.
OR was adjusted for total energy intake and exercise frequency.
p < 0.05 compared to the first quartile by logistic regression analysis.