Literature DB >> 29116393

Reconsidering the role of pelvic lymph node dissection with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in an era of improving radiological staging techniques.

J W Yaxley1, J Dagher2,3, B Delahunt4, L Egevad5, J Srigley6, H Samaratunga2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Performing an extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) on all men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer at the time of a radical prostatectomy (RP) remains controversial. The majority of patients PLND histology is benign, and the long-term cancer-free progression in men with positive lymph node metastasis is low. The objective is to investigate the probability of long-term biochemical freedom from recurrent disease (bNED) in men with lymph node metastasis identified at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of the pathology of 1184 pelvic lymph node dissections performed at the time of a radical prostatectomy by multiple surgeons referred to a single uro-pathology laboratory between 2008 and 2014 identified 61 men with node-positive prostate cancer. Of the men with positive nodes, 24 had a standard PLND and 37 an extended PLND (ePLND). bNED was defined as a post-operative serum PSA < 0.2 ng/ml.
RESULTS: The median follow-up is 4 years (2-8). The median lymph node count was 7 (range 2-16) for PLND and 22 (range 6-46) for the ePLND. A single lymph node metastasis was identified in 56% of the 61 men. Only 10% of men with a positive lymph node metastasis remained free of biochemical recurrence of disease, and only 5% had undetectable serum PSA. There was no difference in bNED outcome between a PLND and ePLND. The number of men needed to be treated with a PLND at the time of RP (NNT) to result in an undetectable post-operative PSA at a median follow-up of 4 years is 395.
CONCLUSIONS: In men with lymph node metastasis, the probability of long-term bNED is low and the NNT for cure is high. With emerging improved radiological imaging techniques increasing the detection of lymph node metastasis outside the extended lymph node dissection templates, more scientific investigation is required to evaluate which men will benefit from a PLND and which men can avoid an unnecessary PLND procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Long-term outcome; Lymph node metastasis; PET-PSMA scan; PLND; Pelvic lymph node dissection; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29116393     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2119-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  26 in total

Review 1.  Sentinel Node Procedure in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review to Assess Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Esther M K Wit; Cenk Acar; Nikolaos Grivas; Cathy Yuan; Simon Horenblas; Fredrik Liedberg; Renato A Valdes Olmos; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Nynke S van den Berg; Alexander Winter; Friedhelm Wawroschek; Stephan Hruby; Günter Janetschek; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Steven MacLennan; Thomas B Lam; Henk G van der Poel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Pathological and oncologic outcomes for men with positive lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy: The Johns Hopkins Hospital 30-year experience.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Michael A Gorin; Ashley E Ross; Zhaoyong Feng; Bruce J Trock; Edward M Schaeffer; Misop Han; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.104

3.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.

Authors:  John W Yaxley; Geoffrey D Coughlin; Suzanne K Chambers; Stefano Occhipinti; Hema Samaratunga; Leah Zajdlewicz; Nigel Dunglison; Rob Carter; Scott Williams; Diane J Payton; Joanna Perry-Keene; Martin F Lavin; Robert A Gardiner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Felix K-H Chun; Andrea Salonia; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Gallina; Luigi Filippo Da Pozzo; Marco Roscigno; Giuseppe Zanni; Luc Valiquette; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Initial Experience of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Prior to Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Lars Budäus; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah; Georg Salomon; Uwe Michl; Hans Heinzer; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Thomas Steuber; Clemens Rosenbaum
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Martin Sanda; Derek Yecies; Lorelei A Mucci; Meir J Stampfer; Stacey A Kenfield
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  The use of 68  Ga-PSMA PET CT in men with biochemical recurrence after definitive treatment of acinar prostate cancer.

Authors:  Greta Meredith; David Wong; John Yaxley; Geoff Coughlin; Les Thompson; Boon Kua; Troy Gianduzzo
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 9.  The role of radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection in lymph node-positive prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Georgios Gakis; Stephen A Boorjian; Alberto Briganti; Steven Joniau; Guram Karazanashvili; R Jeffrey Karnes; Agostino Mattei; Shahrokh F Shariat; Arnulf Stenzl; Manfred Wirth; Christian G Stief
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Long-term outcomes of salvage lymph node dissection for clinically recurrent prostate cancer: results of a single-institution series with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Nazareno Suardi; Giorgio Gandaglia; Andrea Gallina; Ettore Di Trapani; Vincenzo Scattoni; Damiano Vizziello; Vito Cucchiara; Roberto Bertini; Renzo Colombo; Maria Picchio; Giampiero Giovacchini; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  PSMA-PET guided hook-wire localization of nodal metastases in prostate cancer: a targeted approach.

Authors:  Emma Clarebrough; Catriona Duncan; Daniel Christidis; Alain Lavoipierre; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care.

Authors:  Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Consensus statements on the management of clinically localized prostate cancer from the Hong Kong Urological Association and the Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology.

Authors:  Wai-Kit Ma; Darren Ming-Chun Poon; Chi-Kwok Chan; Tim-Wai Chan; Foon-Yiu Cheung; Lap-Yin Ho; Eric Ka-Chai Lee; Angus Kwong-Chuen Leung; Simon Yiu-Lam Leung; Hing-Shing So; Po-Chor Tam; Philip Wai-Kay Kwong
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 5.588

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.