Danny S Park1, Itamar Eskin2, Eun Yong Kang3, Eric R Gamazon4,5, Celeste Eng6, Christopher R Gignoux1,7, Joshua M Galanter6, Esteban Burchard1,6, Chun J Ye8, Hugues Aschard9, Eleazar Eskin3, Eran Halperin2, Noah Zaitlen1,6. 1. Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 2. The Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 3. Department of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. 5. Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 7. Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA. 8. Institute of Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 9. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epistasis and gene-environment interactions are known to contribute significantly to variation of complex phenotypes in model organisms. However, their identification in human association studies remains challenging for myriad reasons. In the case of epistatic interactions, the large number of potential interacting sets of genes presents computational, multiple hypothesis correction, and other statistical power issues. In the case of gene-environment interactions, the lack of consistently measured environmental covariates in most disease studies precludes searching for interactions and creates difficulties for replicating studies. RESULTS: In this work, we develop a new statistical approach to address these issues that leverages genetic ancestry, defined as the proportion of ancestry derived from each ancestral population (e.g., the fraction of European/African ancestry in African Americans), in admixed populations. We applied our method to gene expression and methylation data from African American and Latino admixed individuals, respectively, identifying nine interactions that were significant at P<5×10-8. We show that two of the interactions in methylation data replicate, and the remaining six are significantly enriched for low P-values (P<1.8×10-6). CONCLUSION: We show that genetic ancestry can be a useful proxy for unknown and unmeasured covariates in the search for interaction effects. These results have important implications for our understanding of the genetic architecture of complex traits.
BACKGROUND: Epistasis and gene-environment interactions are known to contribute significantly to variation of complex phenotypes in model organisms. However, their identification in human association studies remains challenging for myriad reasons. In the case of epistatic interactions, the large number of potential interacting sets of genes presents computational, multiple hypothesis correction, and other statistical power issues. In the case of gene-environment interactions, the lack of consistently measured environmental covariates in most disease studies precludes searching for interactions and creates difficulties for replicating studies. RESULTS: In this work, we develop a new statistical approach to address these issues that leverages genetic ancestry, defined as the proportion of ancestry derived from each ancestral population (e.g., the fraction of European/African ancestry in African Americans), in admixed populations. We applied our method to gene expression and methylation data from African American and Latino admixed individuals, respectively, identifying nine interactions that were significant at P<5×10-8. We show that two of the interactions in methylation data replicate, and the remaining six are significantly enriched for low P-values (P<1.8×10-6). CONCLUSION: We show that genetic ancestry can be a useful proxy for unknown and unmeasured covariates in the search for interaction effects. These results have important implications for our understanding of the genetic architecture of complex traits.
Authors: Yael Baran; Bogdan Pasaniuc; Sriram Sankararaman; Dara G Torgerson; Christopher Gignoux; Celeste Eng; William Rodriguez-Cintron; Rocio Chapela; Jean G Ford; Pedro C Avila; Jose Rodriguez-Santana; Esteban Gonzàlez Burchard; Eran Halperin Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Rajesh Kumar; Max A Seibold; Melinda C Aldrich; L Keoki Williams; Alex P Reiner; Laura Colangelo; Joshua Galanter; Christopher Gignoux; Donglei Hu; Saunak Sen; Shweta Choudhry; Edward L Peterson; Jose Rodriguez-Santana; William Rodriguez-Cintron; Michael A Nalls; Tennille S Leak; Ellen O'Meara; Bernd Meibohm; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Rongling Li; Tamara B Harris; Deborah A Nickerson; Myriam Fornage; Paul Enright; Elad Ziv; Lewis J Smith; Kiang Liu; Esteban González Burchard Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-07-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Katherine A Drake; Dara G Torgerson; Christopher R Gignoux; Joshua M Galanter; Lindsey A Roth; Scott Huntsman; Celeste Eng; Sam S Oh; Sook Wah Yee; Lawrence Lin; Carlos D Bustamante; Andrés Moreno-Estrada; Karla Sandoval; Adam Davis; Luisa N Borrell; Harold J Farber; Rajesh Kumar; Pedro C Avila; Emerita Brigino-Buenaventura; Rocio Chapela; Jean G Ford; Michael A Lenoir; Fred Lurmann; Kelley Meade; Denise Serebrisky; Shannon Thyne; William Rodríguez-Cintrón; Saunak Sen; José R Rodríguez-Santana; Ryan D Hernandez; Kathleen M Giacomini; Esteban G Burchard Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2010-06-20 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean Journal: Nature Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Elin Grundberg; Kerrin S Small; Åsa K Hedman; Alexandra C Nica; Alfonso Buil; Sarah Keildson; Jordana T Bell; Tsun-Po Yang; Eshwar Meduri; Amy Barrett; James Nisbett; Magdalena Sekowska; Alicja Wilk; So-Youn Shin; Daniel Glass; Mary Travers; Josine L Min; Sue Ring; Karen Ho; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Augustine Kong; Unnur Thorsteindottir; Chrysanthi Ainali; Antigone S Dimas; Neelam Hassanali; Catherine Ingle; David Knowles; Maria Krestyaninova; Christopher E Lowe; Paola Di Meglio; Stephen B Montgomery; Leopold Parts; Simon Potter; Gabriela Surdulescu; Loukia Tsaprouni; Sophia Tsoka; Veronique Bataille; Richard Durbin; Frank O Nestle; Stephen O'Rahilly; Nicole Soranzo; Cecilia M Lindgren; Krina T Zondervan; Kourosh R Ahmadi; Eric E Schadt; Kari Stefansson; George Davey Smith; Mark I McCarthy; Panos Deloukas; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Tim D Spector Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2012-09-02 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Laura N Anderson; Laurent Briollais; Helen C Atkinson; Julie A Marsh; Jingxiong Xu; Kristin L Connor; Stephen G Matthews; Craig E Pennell; Stephen J Lye Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alice B Popejoy; Deborah I Ritter; Kristy Crooks; Erin Currey; Stephanie M Fullerton; Lucia A Hindorff; Barbara Koenig; Erin M Ramos; Elena P Sorokin; Hannah Wand; Mathew W Wright; James Zou; Christopher R Gignoux; Vence L Bonham; Sharon E Plon; Carlos D Bustamante Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Andrey Ziyatdinov; Margaret M Parker; Amaury Vaysse; Terri H Beaty; Peter Kraft; Michael H Cho; Hugues Aschard Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2019-12-13 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Christoph D Rau; Natalia M Gonzales; Joshua S Bloom; Danny Park; Julien Ayroles; Abraham A Palmer; Aldons J Lusis; Noah Zaitlen Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 6.020