| Literature DB >> 29112685 |
Stephanie Markovina1,2, Songyan Wang1, Lauren E Henke1, Cliff J Luke3, Stephen C Pak3, Todd DeWees1,2, John D Pfeifer2,4,5, Julie K Schwarz1,2, Weijun Liu1, Shuai Chen1, David Mutch2,5, Xiaowei Wang1,2, Matthew A Powell2,5, Barry A Siegel2,6, Farrokh Dehdashti2,6, Gary A Silverman3, Perry W Grigsby1,2,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pretreatment serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) is a prognostic biomarker in women with cervical cancer. SCCA has not been evaluated as an early indicator of response to chemoradiation therapy (CRT). The molecular role of the two SCCA isoforms, SCCA1 (SERPINB3) and SCCA2 (SERPINB4), in cervical cancer is unknown. We hypothesised that changes in serum SCCA during definitive CRT predicts treatment response, and that SCCA1 mediates radiation resistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29112685 PMCID: PMC5765231 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Patient characteristics
| Age (mean, range) | 52 years, 25–83 years |
| Caucasian | 93 (66.4%) |
| Black | 38 (27.2%) |
| Asian | 6 (4.3%) |
| Hispanic | 3 (2.1%) |
| IB1 | 13 (9.4%) |
| IB2 | 30 (21.4%) |
| IIA | 2 (1.4%) |
| IIB | 57 (40.7%) |
| IIIA | 5 (3.6%) |
| IIIB | 30 (21.4%) |
| IVA | 3 (2.1%) |
| Pelvic LN | 82 (58.6%) |
| PA LN | 24 (17.1%) |
| Chemotherapy | 140 (100%) |
| NED | 86 (61.4%) |
| AWD | 14 (10%) |
| DOD | 36 (25.7%) |
| DICD | 4 (2.9%) |
Abbreviations: AWD=alive with disease; DICD=died of intercurrent disease; DOD=died of disease; LN=lymph node; NED=no evidence of disease; PA LN=para-aortic.
Odds ratio for positive post-therapy FDG-PET and serum SCCA metrics in patients with pre-treatment serum SCCA⩾2.2 ng ml−1
| Pretreatment SCCA⩾16.1 ng ml−1 | 4.2 | [1.5–11.76] | 0.0063 |
| SCCA normalised by COT=No | 2.95 | [1.0003–8.7] | 0.049 |
| SCCA normalised by 27 days=No | 3.1 | [1.039–9.25] | 0.043 |
Abbreviation: COT=completion of therapy.
Figure 1Serum SCCA prognostic value. Kaplan-Meier plot of (A) recurrence-free survival and (B) overall survival in all patients (n=137) with serum SCCA⩾16.1 ng/ml at diagnosis compared to those with serum SCCA<16.1 ng ml−1. Kaplan–Meier plot of (C) recurrence-free survival and (D) overall survival in patients with pre-treatment serum SCCA >2.2 ng/ml (n=100) that did or did not normalise (⩽2.2 ng ml−1) by the completion of therapy (COT).
Figure 2Changes in serum SCCA. (A) Mean serum SCCA values over the course of treatment split by recurrence. The number of individual values available for each time point are found below the graph. Asterisks indicate time points that were statistically different between recurrence and no recurrence groups. Kaplan–Meier plot of (B) recurrence-free survival and (C) overall survival of patients with pretreatment SCCA>2.2 ng ml−1 (n=100) and normalised serum SCCA by day 27 of CRT, versus those without. (D) Kaplan–Meier plot of recurrence free survival for patients with normalised serum SCCA by day 27, versus those without, split by positive or negative posttreatment FDG-PET (values available for 93 patients).
Figure 3Intracellular SCCA1 protein. (A) Representative SCCA1 immunohistochemistry scoring, (B) box plot of SCCA1 staining score versus serum SCCA at diagnosis for the same patient, (C) ATCC panel of cervical tumour cell lines subject to Western blot analysis of SCCA1 and GAPDH and relative clonogenic survival of cervical tumour cell lines following increasing doses of RT delivered in a single fraction. (D) Western blot analysis of SCCA and GAPDH on whole cell lysates from SW756 cells engineered to express GFP only (G) or SCCA-GFP (S-G) construct and resultant relative clonogenic survival following increasing doses of single-fraction RT. (E) WB analysis of SCCA comparing CRISPR/Cas-9 control (C) gDNA or SERPINB3-directed gDNA (KO) in SW756 and HT3 cells. (F and G) Clonogenic survival of parent (WT), control and KO cell lines following increasing doses of RT.