| Literature DB >> 29112179 |
Nadjet Rezki1,2, Salsabeel A Al-Sodies3, Sheikh Shreaz4, Rayees Ahmad Shiekh5,6, Mouslim Messali7, Vaseem Raja8, Mohamed R Aouad9,10.
Abstract
A series of specific task ionic liquids (ILs) based on aEntities:
Keywords: Candida; confocal microscopy; fluorine; fungal ergosterol; hydrazones; ionic liquids; ultrasound
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29112179 PMCID: PMC6150352 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22111532
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Conventional versus ultrasound synthesis of halogenated and fluorinated specific task ILs 2–25.
Conventional versus ultrasound times and yields of halogenated specific task ionic liquids (ILs) 2–7.
| Compound No. | R | Conventional Method CM | Ultrasound Method US | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (h) | Yield (%) | Time (h) | Yield (%) | ||
| CH2COOEt | 20 | 90 | 4 | 94 | |
| 24 | 91 | 5 | 94 | ||
| 24 | 80 | 5 | 88 | ||
| C6H5O(CH2)4 | 24 | 93 | 4 | 96 | |
| C6H5CH2 | 40 | 89 | 6 | 92 | |
| OH(CH2)2 | 48 | 80 | 6 | 88 | |
Conventional versus ultrasound times and yields of fluorinated specific task-ILs 8–25.
| Compound No. | R | Y | Conventional Method CM | Ultrasound Method US | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (h) | Yield (%) | Time (h) | Yield (%) | |||
| CH2COOEt | PF6 | 16 | 88 | 4 | 92 | |
| CH2COOEt | BF4 | 16 | 85 | 4 | 90 | |
| CH2COOEt | COOCF3 | 16 | 83 | 4 | 90 | |
| PF6 | 16 | 90 | 4 | 94 | ||
| BF4 | 16 | 86 | 4 | 90 | ||
| COOCF3 | 16 | 92 | 4 | 96 | ||
| PF6 | 16 | 89 | 4 | 92 | ||
| BF4 | 16 | 84 | 4 | 92 | ||
| COOCF3 | 16 | 91 | 4 | 94 | ||
| C6H5O(CH2)4 | PF6 | 16 | 84 | 5 | 92 | |
| C6H5O(CH2)4 | BF4 | 16 | 84 | 5 | 90 | |
| C6H5O(CH2)4 | COOCF3 | 16 | 89 | 5 | 92 | |
| C6H5CH2 | PF6 | 16 | 94 | 5 | 96 | |
| C6H5CH2 | BF4 | 16 | 88 | 5 | 92 | |
| C6H5CH2 | COOCF3 | 16 | 86 | 5 | 90 | |
| OH(CH2)2 | PF6 | 16 | 90 | 5 | 94 | |
| OH(CH2)2 | BF4 | 16 | 83 | 5 | 90 | |
| OH(CH2)2 | COOCF3 | 16 | 87 | 5 | 92 | |
Figure 11H-NMR spectrum of compound 3.
Figure 213C-NMR spectrum of compound 3.
Figure 319F-NMR spectrum of compound 3.
Figure 431P-NMR spectrum of compound 11.
Figure 519F-NMR spectrum of compound 11.
Standard Candida species and clinical isolates used in this study.
| Isolates/Strain | Species (Number of Strains) |
|---|---|
| Sensitive (standard, | |
| ATCC 10261 | |
| ATCC 90030 | |
| ATCC 750 | |
| ATCC 6258 | |
| Clinical isolates ( |
Range of MIC90 (μg/mL) of the synthesized compounds against four standard and 36 clinical Candida isolates.
| Test Agents | MIC90 Range (μg/mL) |
|---|---|
| >1000 | |
| >1000 | |
| >1000 | |
| >1000 | |
| >1000 | |
| 500–1000 | |
| 62.5–250 | |
| 250–500 | |
| 250–500 | |
| 31.25–62.5 | |
| 125–250 | |
| 250–500 | |
| 62.5–125 | |
| 250–500 | |
| 500–1000 | |
| 125–250 | |
| 250–500 | |
| 500–1000 | |
| 125–250 | |
| 250–500 | |
| 500–1000 | |
| 250–500 | |
| 500–1000 | |
| 250–500 | |
| Fluconazole (standard drug) | 1–32 |
Figure 6UV spectrophotometric sterol profile of (a) C. albicans ATCC 10261 (b) C. albicans CN 9 (c) C. albicans CN 38 grown for 16 h in YPD broth containing MIC/4, MIC/2 and MIC of compound 11. UV- Spectral profiles of extracted sterols were read between 230–300 nm. Control implies without any treatment. In the cases of MIC/4 and MIC/2, cells were treated with one fourth and one half of MIC (μg/mL) value of test compound, respectively. In the MIC case, the sample was treated with MIC (μg/mL) value of test compound. The MIC90 for compound 11 against C. albicans ATCC 10261, C. albicans CN 9, and C. albicans CN 38 was 62.5, 31.25 and 62.5 μg/mL, respectively.
Percent ergosterol decrease in three standard and three clinical Candida isolates grown in presence of MIC and sub-MIC values of compounds 8, 11 and 14, respectively.
| % Ergosterol Decrease | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test Compound | Concentration | Standard Strains ( | Clinical Strains ( | |
| Control | 0 | 0 | ||
| MIC/4 | 11.6 (± 0.69) | 12.9 (± 1.15) | ||
| MIC/2 | 38.3 (± 3.05) | 36.73 (± 2.61) | ||
| MIC | 59.06 (± 4.10) | 55.23 (± 2.92) | ||
| MIC/4 | 52.43 (± 3.89) | 53.91 (± 3.26) | ||
| MIC/2 | 65.66 (± 4.93) | 62.76 (± 4.27) | ||
| MIC | 88.26 (± 2.12) | 84.3 (± 5.00) | ||
| MIC/4 | 36.13 (± 4.00) | 29.26 (± 1.16) | ||
| MIC/2 | 51.16 (± 2.36) | 45.72 (± 1.83) | ||
| MIC | 70.4 (± 2.62) | 71.41 (± 3.16) | ||
Figure 7Laser confocal images of C. albicans ATCC 10261. To confirm membrane damage, cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI; red signals). (a) Control (b) Cells treated with compound 8 (c) Cells treated with compound 14 (d) Cells treated with compound 11. Left panel contains Candida cells without any treatment; in this case only dye was added to the cells. No red color was seen in the confocal image in the left panel (control cells); this implies that the dye has not entered the cells. In the right panel (treated cells), the red color is quite visible, implying that cell membranes and cell walls have been disrupted.