Literature DB >> 29112081

Predictors, Prevalence, and Outcomes of Early Crystalloid Responsiveness Among Initially Hypotensive Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock.

Daniel E Leisman1,2,3, Martin E Doerfler4,5, Sandra M Schneider1,6, Kevin D Masick7, Jason A D'Amore1, John K D'Angelo1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of responsiveness to initial fluid challenge among hypotensive sepsis patients is unclear. To avoid fluid overload, and unnecessary treatment, it is important to differentiate these phenotypes. We aimed to 1) determine the proportion of hypotensive sepsis patients sustaining favorable hemodynamic response after initial fluid challenge, 2) determine demographic and clinical risk factors that predicted refractory hypotension, and 3) assess the association between timeliness of fluid resuscitation and refractoriness.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective, multisite, observational, consecutive-sample cohort.
SETTING: Nine tertiary and community hospitals over 1.5 years. PATIENTS: Inclusion criteria 1) suspected or confirmed infection, 2) greater than or equal to two systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, 3) systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg, greater than 40% decrease from baseline, or mean arterial pressure less than 65 mm Hg.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sex, age, heart failure, renal failure, immunocompromise, source of infection, initial lactate, coagulopathy, temperature, altered mentation, altered gas exchange, and acute kidney injury were used to generate a risk score. The primary outcome was sustained normotension after fluid challenge without vasopressor titration. Among 3,686 patients, 2,350 (64%) were fluid responsive. Six candidate risk factors significantly predicted refractoriness in multivariable analysis: heart failure (odds ratio, 1.43; CI, 1.20-1.72), hypothermia (odds ratio, 1.37; 1.10-1.69), altered gas exchange (odds ratio, 1.33; 1.12-1.57), initial lactate greater than or equal to 4.0 mmol/L (odds ratio, 1.28; 1.08-1.52), immunocompromise (odds ratio, 1.23; 1.03-1.47), and coagulopathy (odds ratio, 1.23; 1.03-1.48). High-risk patients (≥ three risk factors) had 70% higher (CI, 48-96%) refractory risk (19% higher absolute risk; CI, 14-25%) versus low-risk (zero risk factors) patients. Initiating fluids in greater than 2 hours also predicted refractoriness (odds ratio, 1.96; CI, 1.49-2.58). Mortality was 15% higher (CI, 10-18%) for refractory patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Two in three hypotensive sepsis patients were responsive to initial fluid resuscitation. Heart failure, hypothermia, immunocompromise, hyperlactemia, and coagulopathy were associated with the refractory phenotype. Fluid resuscitation initiated after the initial 2 hours more strongly predicted refractoriness than any patient factor tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29112081     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  15 in total

1.  [Intensive care studies from 2017/2018].

Authors:  C J Reuß; M Bernhard; C Beynon; A Hecker; C Jungk; C Nusshag; M A Weigand; D Michalski; T Brenner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Driving blind: instituting SEP-1 without high quality outcomes data.

Authors:  Jeffrey Wang; Jeffrey R Strich; Willard N Applefeld; Junfeng Sun; Xizhong Cui; Charles Natanson; Peter Q Eichacker
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Evaluation and Predictors of Fluid Resuscitation in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.

Authors:  Hani I Kuttab; Joseph D Lykins; Michelle D Hughes; Kristen Wroblewski; Eric P Keast; Omobolawa Kukoyi; Jason A Kopec; Stephen Hall; Michael A Ward
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Sepsis Presenting in Hospitals versus Emergency Departments: Demographic, Resuscitation, and Outcome Patterns in a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort.

Authors:  Daniel E Leisman; Catalina Angel; Sandra M Schneider; Jason A D'Amore; John K D'Angelo; Martin E Doerfler
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 5.  Expert statement for the management of hypovolemia in sepsis.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Maurizio Cecconi; Maria Cronhjort; Michael Darmon; Stephan M Jakob; Ville Pettilä; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients.

Authors:  Mathieu Jozwiak; Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

Review 7.  Fluid Management in Sepsis.

Authors:  Ryan M Brown; Matthew W Semler
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.510

Review 8.  Resuscitation fluids.

Authors:  Jonathan D Casey; Ryan M Brown; Matthew W Semler
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.687

9.  The Effect of Body Mass Index and Weight-Adjusted Fluid Dosing on Mortality in Sepsis.

Authors:  Michael A Ward; Hani I Kuttab; Joseph D Lykins V; Kristen Wroblewski; Michelle D Hughes; Eric P Keast; Jason A Kopec; Erron M Rourke; John Purakal
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.510

10.  Association of fluid balance trajectories with clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a prospective multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Mei-Ping Wang; Li Jiang; Bo Zhu; Bin Du; Wen Li; Yan He; Xiu-Ming Xi
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2021-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.