Literature DB >> 29111936

Empowerment Failure: How Shortcomings in Physician Communication Unwittingly Undermine Patient Autonomy.

Peter A Ubel1, Karen A Scherr1, Angela Fagerlin2.   

Abstract

Many health care decisions depend not only upon medical facts, but also on value judgments-patient goals and preferences. Until recent decades, patients relied on doctors to tell them what to do. Then ethicists and others convinced clinicians to adopt a paradigm shift in medical practice, to recognize patient autonomy, by orienting decision making toward the unique goals of individual patients. Unfortunately, current medical practice often falls short of empowering patients. In this article, we reflect on whether the current state of medical decision making effectively promotes patients' health care goals. We base our reflections, in part, on research in which we observed physicians making earnest efforts to partner with patients in making treatment decisions, but still struggling to empower patients-failing to communicate clearly to patients about decision-relevant information, overwhelming patients with irrelevant information, overlooking when patients' emotions made it hard to engage in choices, and making recommendations before discussing patients' goals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autonomy; informed consent; physician/patient communication; shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29111936      PMCID: PMC6312722          DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1378753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  22 in total

1.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  "What should I do, doc?": Some psychologic benefits of physician recommendations.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-05-13

3.  What Philadelphia physicians tell patients with cancer.

Authors:  W T FITTS; I S RAVDIN
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1953-11-07

4.  New elements for informed decision making: a qualitative study of older adults' views.

Authors:  Erika Leemann Price; Sylvia Bereknyei; Alma Kuby; Wendy Levinson; Clarence Henry Braddock
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-07-14

Review 5.  Learning under stress: how does it work?

Authors:  Marian Joëls; Zhenwei Pu; Olof Wiegert; Melly S Oitzl; Harm J Krugers
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango).

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Medical Facts versus Value Judgments--Toward Preference-Sensitive Guidelines.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt; Michael K Brawer; Karen M Jones; Michael J Barry; William J Aronson; Steven Fox; Jeffrey R Gingrich; John T Wei; Patricia Gilhooly; B Mayer Grob; Imad Nsouli; Padmini Iyer; Ruben Cartagena; Glenn Snider; Claus Roehrborn; Roohollah Sharifi; William Blank; Parikshit Pandya; Gerald L Andriole; Daniel Culkin; Thomas Wheeler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer. Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team.

Authors:  A B Flood; J E Wennberg; R F Nease; F J Fowler; J Ding; L M Hynes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Oncologist communication about emotion during visits with patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn I Pollak; Robert M Arnold; Amy S Jeffreys; Stewart C Alexander; Maren K Olsen; Amy P Abernethy; Celette Sugg Skinner; Keri L Rodriguez; James A Tulsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  13 in total

1.  Exploring the Relationship between Shared Decision-Making, Patient-Centered Medicine, and Evidence-Based Medicine.

Authors:  Gustavo Páez; Daniel Neves Forte; María Del Pilar López Gabeiras
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2021-06-30

2.  Characterizing the Language Used to Discuss Death in Family Meetings for Critically Ill Infants.

Authors:  Margaret H Barlet; Mary C Barks; Peter A Ubel; J Kelly Davis; Kathryn I Pollak; Erica C Kaye; Kevin P Weinfurt; Monica E Lemmon
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-10-03

3.  Assessing Physician's Motivational Communication Skills: 5-Step Mixed Methods Development Study of the Motivational Communication Competency Assessment Test.

Authors:  Vincent Gosselin Boucher; Simon Bacon; Brigitte Voisard; Anda I Dragomir; Claudia Gemme; Florent Larue; Sara Labbé; Geneviève Szczepanik; Kimberly Corace; Tavis Campbell; Michael Vallis; Gary Garber; Codie Rouleau; Jean G Diodati; Doreen Rabi; Serge Sultan; Kim Lavoie
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-24

4.  Factors that influence older patients' participation in clinical communication within developed country hospitals and GP clinics: A systematic review of current literature.

Authors:  Harry James Gaffney; Mohammad Hamiduzzaman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  Beyond rationality: Expanding the practice of shared decision making in modern medicine.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Thomas; Sarah Bauerle Bass; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Engaging patients in population-based chronic disease management: A qualitative study of barriers and intervention opportunities.

Authors:  Anya Fang; Dana Abdelgadir; Anjali Gopalan; Thekla Ross; Connie S Uratsu; Stacy A Sterling; Richard W Grant; Esti Iturralde
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-05-04

7.  Applying Reflective Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to Patient-Clinician Shared Decision-Making on the Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NET) in the Spanish Context.

Authors:  Monika Wagner; Dima Samaha; Jesus Cuervo; Harshila Patel; Marta Martinez; William M O'Neil; Paula Jimenez-Fonseca
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Prenatal parental involvement in decision for delivery room management at 22-26 weeks of gestation in France - The EPIPAGE-2 Cohort Study.

Authors:  Cerise Levaillant; Laurence Caeymaex; Hélène Béhal; Monique Kaminski; Caroline Diguisto; Barthélémy Tosello; Elie Azria; Olivier Claris; Pierre Bétrémieux; Laurence Foix L'Hélias; Patrick Truffert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Enhancing patient safety by integrating ethical dimensions to Critical Incident Reporting Systems.

Authors:  Kai Wehkamp; Eva Kuhn; Rainer Petzina; Alena Buyx; Annette Rogge
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Key Physician Behaviors that Predict Prudent, Preference Concordant Decisions at the End of Life.

Authors:  Andre Morales; Alan Murphy; Joseph B Fanning; Shasha Gao; Kevan Schultz; Daniel E Hall; Amber Barnato
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2020-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.