| Literature DB >> 29110723 |
Azirwan Guswanto1,2, Puttik Allamanda2, Euis Siti Mariamah2, Sodirun Sodirun2, Putut Eko Wibowo2, Liliek Indrayani2, Rudi Harso Nugroho3, I Ketut Wirata4, Nur Jannah5, Lepsi Putri Dias6, Hadi Purnama Wirawan7, Rochmadi Yanto8, Bumduuren Tuvshintulga1, Thillaiampalam Sivakumar1, Naoaki Yokoyama1, Ikuo Igarashi9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bovine babesiosis, mainly caused by Babesia bovis and B. bigemina, is a huge threat to the livestock industry. In Indonesia, the current distribution of the disease is unknown due to a lack of scientific study.Entities:
Keywords: Bovine babesiosis; Indonesia; Molecular detection; Serological detection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29110723 PMCID: PMC5674684 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2502-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Geographical distribution of the sampling locations. A total of 487 blood samples were collected from clinically healthy cattle from sixteen locations across the Indonesian archipelago: Mandailing Natal (n = 32), Tapanuli Selatan (n = 28), Padang Mangateh (n = 60), Tangerang Regency (n = 18), Bogor Regency (n = 16), Karawang (n = 21), Indramayu (n = 10), Lamongan (n = 40), Jombang (n = 40), Tabalong (n = 60), Bulukumba (n = 74), Dompu (n = 17), Lombok Timur (n = 16), Kupang (n = 19), Manggarai Timur (n = 19) and Malaka (n = 17)
Target genes and primers used in this study [26, 27]
| Species | Target gene | Method | Primer name | Oligonucleotide sequence (5′–3′) | Product size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| PCR | bov-SBP-4-F | AGTTGTTGGAGGAGGCTAAT | 907 |
| bov-SBP-4-R | TCCTTCTCGGCGTCCTTTTC | ||||
| nPCR | bov-SBP-4-nF | GAAATCCCTGTTCCAGAG | 503 | ||
| bov-SBP-4-nR | TCGTTGATAACACTGCAA | ||||
|
|
| PCR | big-RAP-1a-F | GAGTCTGCCAAATCCTTAC | 879 |
| big-RAP-1a-R | TCCTCTACAGCTGCTTCG | ||||
| nPCR | big-RAP-1a-nF | AGCTTGCTTTCACAACTCGCC | 412 | ||
| big-RAP-1a-nR | TTGGTGCTTTGACCGACGACAT | ||||
|
| ITS region | PCR | bov-ITS-F | CGTCCCTGCCCTTTGTA | 815 |
| bov-ITS-R | TATTTTCTTTTCTGCCGCTT | ||||
| nPCR | bov-ITS-nF | CACCACCAGTGGAAGCAC | 545 | ||
| bov-ITS-nR | TTGTGCCCCATGGACACT | ||||
|
| ITS region | PCR | big-ITS-F | CGTCCCTGCCCTTTGTA | 1041 |
| big-ITS-R | TATTTTCTTTTCTGCCGCTT | ||||
| nPCR | big-ITS-nF | AGTGGTCGGGACTCGTC | 495 | ||
| big-ITS-nR | AGTACCGCGTGCGAGCAG |
ELISA, ICTs and nPCR results of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina in all sampling locations
| Sampling location | No. of samples | No. positive (%) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Mixed infection | |||||||||||
|
|
| dual-ICT | nPCR |
|
| dual-ICT | nPCR |
|
| dual-ICT | nPCR | ||
| Karawang | 21 | 18 (85.7) | 17 (81.0) | 17 (81.0) | 7 (33.3) | 9 (42.9) | 8 (38.1) | 8 (38.1) | 2 (9.5) | 9 (42.9) | 8 (38.1) | 8 (38.1) | 1 (4.8) |
| Tangerang | 18 | 16 (88.9) | 13 (72.2) | 14 (77.8) | 11 (61.1) | 15 (83.3) | 14 (77.8) | 12 (66.7) | 1 (5.6) | 14 (77.8) | 11 (61.1) | 10 (55.6) | 0 (0.0) |
| Bogor | 16 | 13 (81.3) | 10 (62.5) | 11 (68.8) | 7 (43.8) | 13 (81.3) | 10 (62.5) | 10 (62.5) | 2 (12.5) | 10 (62.5) | 6 (37.5) | 7 (43.8) | 2 (12.5) |
| Indramayu | 10 | 4 (40.0) | 4 (40.0) | 4 (40.0) | 2 (20.0) | 4 (40.0) | 4 (40.0) | 3 (30.0) | 2 (20.0) | 2 (20.0) | 2 (20.0) | 2 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Padang Mangateh | 60 | 59 (98.3) | 51 (85.0) | 51 (85.0) | 13 (21.7) | 26 (43.3) | 25 (41.7) | 25 (41.7) | 28 (46.7) | 26 (43.3) | 21 (35.0) | 21 (35.0) | 6 (10.0) |
| Dompu | 17 | 16 (94.1) | 15 (88.2) | 15 (88.2) | 3 (17.6) | 10 (58.8) | 10 (58.8) | 11 (64.7) | 3 (17.6) | 10 (58.8) | 9 (52.9) | 10 (58.8) | 1 (5.9) |
| Lombok Timur | 16 | 9 (56.3) | 8 (50.0) | 8 (50.0) | 14 (87.5) | 1 (6.3) | 2 (12.5) | 2 (12.5) | 6 (37.5) | 1 (6.3) | 2 (12.5) | 2 (12.5) | 5 (31.3) |
| Kupang | 19 | 17 (89.5) | 18 (94.7) | 17 (89.5) | 17 (89.5) | 2 (10.5) | 3 (15.8) | 3 (15.8) | 5 (26.3) | 2 (10.5) | 3(15.8) | 3 (15.8) | 4 (21.1) |
| Manggarai Timur | 19 | 19 (100) | 19 (100) | 19 (100) | 18 (94.7) | 7 (36.8) | 7 (36.8) | 7 (36.8) | 7 (36.8) | 7 (36.8) | 7 (36.8) | 7 (36.8) | 7 (36.8) |
| Malaka | 17 | 17 (100) | 17 (100) | 17 (100) | 14 (82.4) | 7 (41.2) | 8 (47.1) | 8 (47.1) | 6 (35.3) | 7 (41.2) | 8 (47.1) | 8 (47.1) | 5 (29.4) |
| Tabalong | 60 | 50 (83.3) | 47 (78.3) | 40 (66.7) | 30 (50.0) | 14 (23.3) | 11 (18.3) | 8 (13.3) | 6 (10.0) | 13 (21.7) | 10 (16.7) | 6 (10.0) | 5 (8.3) |
| Mandailing Natal | 32 | 29 (90.6) | 27 (84.4) | 27 (84.4) | 14 (43.8) | 9 (28.1) | 10 (31.3) | 10 (31.3) | 12 (37.5) | 9 (28.1) | 9 (28.1) | 9 (28.1) | 8 (25.0) |
| Tapanuli Selatan | 28 | 27 (96.4) | 24 (85.7) | 23 (82.1) | 14 (50.0) | 9 (32.1) | 11 (39.3) | 11 (39.3) | 5 (17.9) | 8 (28.6) | 10 (35.7) | 9 (32.1) | 3 (10.7) |
| Bulukumba | 74 | 38 (51.4) | 42 (56.8) | 39 (52.7) | 51 (68.9) | 8 (10.8) | 7 (9.5) | 8 (10.8) | 6 (8.1) | 7 (9.5) | 7 (9.5) | 7 (9.5) | 5 (6.8) |
| Lamongan | 40 | 4 (10.0) | 2 (5.0) | 2 (5.0) | 18 (45.0) | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.5) | 1 (2.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) |
| Jombang | 40 | 4 (10.0) | 3 (7.5) | 3 (7.5) | 14 (35.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) |
| Total | 487 | 340 (69.8) | 317 (65.1) | 307 (63.0) | 247 (50.7) | 134 (27.5) | 130 (26.7) | 127 (26.1) | 93 (19.1) | 125 (25.7) | 113 (23.2) | 109 (22.4) | 52 (10.7) |
Agreement between serological methods
| Diagnostic methods | Kappa value | 95% CIa | Agreementb |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.744 | 0.688–0.800 | Good |
| dual-ICT and | 0.743 | 0.687–0.798 | Good |
|
| 0.927 | 0.896–0.957 | Very good |
|
| 0.841 | 0.793–0.889 | Very good |
| dual-ICT and | 0.748 | 0.689–0.808 | Good |
|
| 0.888 | 0.847–0.929 | Very good |
a95% confidence interval
bAgreement was analyzed using kappa statistics and stated as poor (< 0.20), fair (0.21–0.40), moderate (0.41–0.60), good (0.61–0.80), or very good (0.81–1.00) [31]
Comparison of the results summary of ELISA, ICT and nested PCR
| Species | ELISA |
| Dual-ICT | Nested PCR | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (+) | (−) |
| (+) | (−) |
| (+) | (−) |
| |||
|
| (+) | 340 (69.8) | 303 (62.2) | 37 (7.6) | < 0.0001 | 299 (61.4) | 41 (8.4) | < 0.0001 | 174 (35.7) | 166 (34.1) | 0.759 |
| (−) | 147 (30.2) | 14 (2.9) | 133 (27.3) | 8 (1.6) | 139 (28.5) | 73 (15.0) | 74 (15.2) | ||||
| Total | 487 | 317 (65.1) | 170 (34.9) | 307 (63.0) | 180 (37.0) | 247 (50.7) | 240 (49.3) | ||||
|
| (+) | 134 (27.5) | 121 (24.8) | 13 (2.7) | < 0.0001 | 110 (22.6) | 24 (4.9) | < 0.0001 | 36 (7.4) | 98 (20.1) | 0.010 |
| (−) | 353 (72.5) | 9 (1.8) | 344 (70.6) | 17 (3.5) | 336 (69.0) | 57 (11.7) | 296 (60.8) | ||||
| Total | 487 | 130 (26.7) | 357 (73.3) | 127 (26.1) | 360 (73.9) | 93 (19.1) | 394 (80.9) | ||||
Fig. 2Comparison of positive rates between the breeds and age groups of cattle: (a) and (b) show the effect of breeds on the infection of B. bovis and B. bigemina, respectively; (c) and (d) show the effect of age groups on the infection of B. bovis and B. bigemina, respectively. The data were analyzed using Chi-square test (ns, P ≥ 0.05; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001)
Fig. 3Phylogenetic tree based on Babesia bovis ITS1 partial sequence, 5.8S rRNA complete sequence, and ITS2 partial sequence data from Indonesian isolates and other sequences from GenBank. The maximum likelihood method based on the Kimura 2-parameter model with 1000 bootstrap replicates, available in MEGA ver.7, was used to determine the evolutionary history [30, 40]. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. Indonesian isolates are indicated by bold font
Fig. 4Phylogenetic tree based on Babesia bigemina ITS1 partial sequence and 5.8S rRNA partial sequence data from Indonesian isolates and other sequences from GenBank. The maximum likelihood method based on the Kimura 2-parameter model with 1000 bootstrap replicates, available in MEGA ver.7, was used to determine the evolutionary history [30, 40]. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. Indonesian isolates are indicated by bold font
Nucleotide polymorphism analysis of B. bovis and B. bigemina isolates from Indonesia
| Target gene |
| No. of sites |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 16 | 512 | 12 | 0.942 | 0.018 | 9.142 |
|
| 13 | 412 | 10 | 0.949 | 0.028 | 10.590 |
|
| 9 | 538 | 8 | 0.972 | 0.079 | 35.889 |
|
| 8 | 500 | 8 | 1.000 | 0.032 | 15.786 |
Abbreviations: N number of sequences, h number of haplotypes, hd haplotype diversity, π nucleotide diversity, k average number of nucleotide differences