Literature DB >> 29110260

Disparities in reproductive outcomes according to the endometrial preparation protocol in frozen embryo transfer : The risk of early pregnancy loss in frozen embryo transfer cycles.

I Hatoum1, L Bellon1, N Swierkowski1, M Ouazana1, S Bouba1, K Fathallah1, B Paillusson1, M Bailly1, F Boitrelle1,2, L Alter1,2, M Bergère1,2, J Selva1,2,3, R Wainer4,5,6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of stimulated and artificial endometrial preparation protocols on reproductive outcomes in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 1926 FET cycles over a 3.5-year period in the Fertility Unit at a University Hospital. Stimulated and artificial protocols were used for endometrial preparation. The embryos for FET were obtained from either in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Live birth rate and early pregnancy loss rates were retrospectively compared. In artificial protocols, oral or vaginal administration of oestradiol 2 mg two or three times a day was followed by vaginal supplementation with progesterone 200 mg two or three times a day. In stimulated protocols, recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone was administered from day 4 onward. Vaginal ultrasound was used for endometrial and ovarian monitoring. A pregnancy test was performed 14 days after FET. If it was positive, oestradiol and progesterone were administered up until the 12th week of gestation in artificial cycles. We defined early pregnancy losses as biochemical pregnancies (preclinical losses) and miscarriages.
RESULTS: Data on 865 artificial cycles (45% of the total) and 1061 stimulated cycles (55%) were collected. Early pregnancy loss rate was significantly lower for stimulated cycles (34.2%) than for artificial cycles (56.9%), and the live birth rate was significantly higher for stimulated cycles (59.7%) than for artificial cycles (29.1%).
CONCLUSION: In frozen embryo transfer, artificial cycles were associated with more early pregnancy loss and lower live birth rate than stimulated cycles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial preparation; Frozen embryo transfer; Reproductive outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29110260      PMCID: PMC5904055          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-1078-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  17 in total

1.  International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009.

Authors:  F Zegers-Hochschild; G D Adamson; J de Mouzon; O Ishihara; R Mansour; K Nygren; E Sullivan; S Vanderpoel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  [Guidelines for clinical practice: « Pregnancy losses ». Introduction and legislation].

Authors:  D Lemery; G Legendre; C Huchon; I Perrier; X Deffieux
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2014-11-07

Review 3.  Progesterone supplementation in the frozen embryo transfer cycle.

Authors:  Israel Ortega; Juan Antonio García Velasco
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Artificial versus stimulated cycles for endometrial preparation prior to frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Authors:  Kristen Page Wright; Juliette Guibert; Sherry Weitzen; Celine Davy; Patricia Fauque; Francois Olivennes
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of modified natural versus artificial cycle for cryo-thawed embryo transfer.

Authors:  E R Groenewoud; B J Cohlen; A Al-Oraiby; E A Brinkhuis; F J M Broekmans; J P de Bruin; G van den Dool; K Fleisher; J Friederich; M Goddijn; A Hoek; D A Hoozemans; E M Kaaijk; C A M Koks; J S E Laven; P J Q van der Linden; A P Manger; E Slappendel; T Spinder; B J Kollen; N S Macklon
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010.

Authors:  S Dyer; G M Chambers; J de Mouzon; K G Nygren; F Zegers-Hochschild; R Mansour; O Ishihara; M Banker; G D Adamson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Pregnancy outcome following frozen embryo transfer after artificial cycle or treatment by clomiphene citrate.

Authors:  Caroline Jouan; Violaine Emonard; Philippe Ruggeri; Laurent Debelle; Nadine Hincourt; Sophie Lorquet; Valérie Dechenne; Caroline Giner; Michel Dubois; Sophie Perrier d'Hauterive; Michelle Nisolle
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Direct transport of progesterone from vagina to uterus.

Authors:  E Cicinelli; D de Ziegler; C Bulletti; M G Matteo; L M Schonauer; P Galantino
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Serum progesterone levels greater than 20 ng/dl on day of embryo transfer are associated with lower live birth and higher pregnancy loss rates.

Authors:  Jason D Kofinas; Jennifer Blakemore; David H McCulloh; Jamie Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Strategies for improving outcome of assisted reproduction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Kollmann; W P Martins; M L S Lima; L Craciunas; C O Nastri; A Richardson; N Raine-Fenning
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 7.299

View more
  3 in total

1.  Pregnancy Outcomes of Different Endometrial Preparation in Patients With a History of Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Run Xin Gan; Yuan Li; Juan Song; Quan Wen; Guang Xiu Lu; Ge Lin; Fei Gong
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.055

2.  Impact of endometrial preparation on early pregnancy loss and live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer: a large multicenter cohort study (14 421 frozen cycles).

Authors:  L Vinsonneau; J Labrosse; G Porcu-Buisson; N Chevalier; J Galey; N Ahdad; J P Ayel; C Rongières; P E Bouet; E Mathieu d'Argent; I Cédrin-Durnerin; F Pessione; N Massin
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-02-15

3.  Comparison of Stimulated Cycles with Low Dose r-FSH versus Hormone Replacement Cycles for Endometrial Preparation Prior to Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Young Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study from China.

Authors:  Li Li; Dan-Dan Gao; Yi Zhang; Jing-Yan Song; Zhen-Gao Sun
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.162

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.