Literature DB >> 26125977

Progesterone supplementation in the frozen embryo transfer cycle.

Israel Ortega1, Juan Antonio García Velasco.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Currently, different modalities with regard to endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FTET) are used, the natural and artificial cycles being the most common approaches. This review is aimed to update the current knowledge about progesterone supplementation in both types of protocols. RECENT
FINDINGS: Natural cycle-frozen-thawed embryo transfer (NC-FTET) is the favored option for women with normal ovulatory menstrual cycles and may be programmed following two different protocols: the 'true NC-FTET', associated with daily blood or urine luteinizing hormone measurements, and 'modified NC-FTET', triggering ovulation with human chorionic gonadotropin. Both methods of endometrial preparation show comparable reproductive outcomes. In artificial cycle-frozen-thawed embryo transfer, estrogen and progesterone are sequentially administered, being the option of choice for women with irregular menstrual cycles. Nowadays, no differences between the different formulations of progesterone have been observed. Furthermore, there seems to be no agreement on doses and duration of progesterone supplementation during FTET.
SUMMARY: We conclude that, according to the current available data, there is no superiority of any one regimen over another with regard to reproductive outcomes. Therefore, the final decision must be based on individualization of the treatment while considering patient characteristics prior to FTET, convenience, optimization of clinical outcomes and cost efficiency of the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26125977     DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  6 in total

1.  Disparities in reproductive outcomes according to the endometrial preparation protocol in frozen embryo transfer : The risk of early pregnancy loss in frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  I Hatoum; L Bellon; N Swierkowski; M Ouazana; S Bouba; K Fathallah; B Paillusson; M Bailly; F Boitrelle; L Alter; M Bergère; J Selva; R Wainer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Is duration of estrogen supplementation associated with clinical outcomes in frozen-thawed autologous single-blastocyst transfer cycles?

Authors:  Xiaofang Li; Wenhao Shi; Yan'e Gao; Juanzi Shi; Na Li; Haiyan Bai
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.357

3.  Optimal parameters for determining the LH surge in natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfers.

Authors:  Mohamad Irani; Alex Robles; Vinay Gunnala; David Reichman; Zev Rosenwaks
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.234

4.  Comparison of intramuscular versus subcutaneous aqueous progesterone for luteal phase support in artificially prepared frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Emre Niyazi Turgut; Fazilet Kübra Boynukalın; Meral Gültomruk; Zalihe Yarkıner; Mustafa Bahçeci
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-12-10

Review 5.  Progesterone administration for luteal phase deficiency in human reproduction: an old or new issue?

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Susanna Santagni; Giovanni Battista La Sala
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.234

6.  Follicular phase length has no influence on frozen-thawed embryo transfers in natural cycles.

Authors:  Ying Ying; Fuman Qiu; Qing Huang; Sichen Li; Haiying Liu; Jianqiao Liu
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.234

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.