Literature DB >> 29109930

Error assessment in molecular dynamics trajectories using computed NMR chemical shifts.

David R Koes1, John K Vries1.   

Abstract

Accurate chemical shifts for the atoms in molecular mechanics (MD) trajectories can be obtained from quantum mechanical (QM) calculations that depend solely on the coordinates of the atoms in the localized regions surrounding atoms of interest. If these coordinates are correct and the sample size is adequate, the ensemble average of these chemical shifts should be equal to the chemical shifts obtained from NMR spectroscopy. If this is not the case, the coordinates must be incorrect. We have utilized this fact to quantify the errors associated with the backbone atoms in MD simulations of proteins. A library of regional conformers containing 169,499 members was constructed from 6 model proteins. The chemical shifts associated with the backbone atoms in each of these conformers was obtained from QM calculations using density functional theory at the B3LYP level with a 6-311+G(2d,p) basis set. Chemical shifts were assigned to each backbone atom in each MD simulation frame using a template matching approach. The ensemble average of these chemical shifts was compared to chemical shifts from NMR spectroscopy. A large systematic error was identified that affected the 1H atoms of the peptide bonds involved in hydrogen bonding with water molecules or peptide backbone atoms. This error was highly sensitive to changes in electrostatic parameters. Smaller errors affecting the 13Ca and 15N atoms were also detected. We believe these errors could be useful as metrics for comparing the force-fields and parameter sets used in MD simulation because they are directly tied to errors in atomic coordinates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical shift; Force fields; Molecular dynamics; Peptide bonds

Year:  2016        PMID: 29109930      PMCID: PMC5669388          DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2016.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Theor Chem            Impact factor:   1.926


  46 in total

Review 1.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Martin Karplus; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2002-09

Review 2.  Force fields for protein simulations.

Authors:  Jay W Ponder; David A Case
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2003

3.  Validation of Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Biomolecules Using NMR Spin Relaxation as Benchmarks:  Application to the AMBER99SB Force Field.

Authors:  Scott A Showalter; Rafael Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Toward the Quantum Chemical Calculation of NMR Chemical Shifts of Proteins. 2. Level of Theory, Basis Set, and Solvents Model Dependence.

Authors:  Andrea Frank; Heiko M Möller; Thomas E Exner
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Quantitative molecular ensemble interpretation of NMR dipolar couplings without restraints.

Authors:  Scott A Showalter; Rafael Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit.

Authors:  Sander Pronk; Szilárd Páll; Roland Schulz; Per Larsson; Pär Bjelkmar; Rossen Apostolov; Michael R Shirts; Jeremy C Smith; Peter M Kasson; David van der Spoel; Berk Hess; Erik Lindahl
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Are Protein Force Fields Getting Better? A Systematic Benchmark on 524 Diverse NMR Measurements.

Authors:  Kyle A Beauchamp; Yu-Shan Lin; Rhiju Das; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  The Polarizable Atomic Multipole-based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Zhen Xia; Jiajing Zhang; Robert Best; Chuanjie Wu; Jay W Ponder; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Comparison of Secondary Structure Formation Using 10 Different Force Fields in Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Elio A Cino; Wing-Yiu Choy; Mikko Karttunen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating amber force fields using computed NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  David R Koes; John K Vries
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-07-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.