Literature DB >> 26627416

Validation of Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Biomolecules Using NMR Spin Relaxation as Benchmarks:  Application to the AMBER99SB Force Field.

Scott A Showalter1, Rafael Brüschweiler1.   

Abstract

Biological function of biomolecules is accompanied by a wide range of motional behavior. Accurate modeling of dynamics by molecular dynamics (MD) computer simulations is therefore a useful approach toward the understanding of biomolecular function. NMR spin relaxation measurements provide rigorous benchmarks for assessing important aspects of MD simulations, such as the amount and time scales of conformational space sampling, which are intimately related to the underlying molecular mechanics force field. Until recently, most simulations produced trajectories that exhibited too much dynamics particularly in flexible loop regions. Recent modifications made to the backbone φ and ψ torsion angle potentials of the AMBER and CHARMM force fields indicate that these changes produce more realistic molecular dynamics behavior. To assess the consequences of these changes, we performed a series of 5-20 ns molecular dynamics trajectories of human ubiquitin using the AMBER99 and AMBER99SB force fields for different conditions and water models and compare the results with NMR experimental backbone N-H S(2) order parameters. A quantitative analysis of the trajectories shows significantly improved agreement with experimental NMR data for the AMBER99SB force field as compared to AMBER99. Because NMR spin relaxation data (T1, T2, NOE) reflect the combined effects of spatial and temporal fluctuations of bond vectors, it is found that comparison of experimental and back-calculated NMR spin-relaxation data provides a more objective way of assessing the quality of the trajectory than order parameters alone. Analysis of a key mobile β-hairpin in ubiquitin demonstrates that the dynamics of mobile sites are not only reduced by the modified force field, but the extent of motional correlations between amino acids is also markedly diminished.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 26627416     DOI: 10.1021/ct7000045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  65 in total

1.  Nonexponential decay of internal rotational correlation functions of native proteins and self-similar structural fluctuations.

Authors:  Yoann Cote; Patrick Senet; Patrice Delarue; Gia G Maisuradze; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Structural dynamics of bio-macromolecules by NMR: the slowly relaxing local structure approach.

Authors:  Eva Meirovitch; Yury E Shapiro; Antonino Polimeno; Jack H Freed
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.795

3.  Dynamic origins of differential RNA binding function in two dsRBDs from the miRNA "microprocessor" complex.

Authors:  Christopher Wostenberg; Kaycee A Quarles; Scott A Showalter
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 4.  A community resource of experimental data for NMR / X-ray crystal structure pairs.

Authors:  John K Everett; Roberto Tejero; Sarath B K Murthy; Thomas B Acton; James M Aramini; Michael C Baran; Jordi Benach; John R Cort; Alexander Eletsky; Farhad Forouhar; Rongjin Guan; Alexandre P Kuzin; Hsiau-Wei Lee; Gaohua Liu; Rajeswari Mani; Binchen Mao; Jeffrey L Mills; Alexander F Montelione; Kari Pederson; Robert Powers; Theresa Ramelot; Paolo Rossi; Jayaraman Seetharaman; David Snyder; G V T Swapna; Sergey M Vorobiev; Yibing Wu; Rong Xiao; Yunhuang Yang; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; John F Hunt; Michael A Kennedy; James H Prestegard; Thomas Szyperski; Liang Tong; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Protein Allostery and Conformational Dynamics.

Authors:  Jingjing Guo; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Structural analysis of protein dynamics by MD simulations and NMR spin-relaxation.

Authors:  Nikola Trbovic; Byungchan Kim; Richard A Friesner; Arthur G Palmer
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-05-01

7.  Self-consistent residual dipolar coupling based model-free analysis for the robust determination of nanosecond to microsecond protein dynamics.

Authors:  Nils-Alexander Lakomek; Korvin F A Walter; Christophe Farès; Oliver F Lange; Bert L de Groot; Helmut Grubmüller; Rafael Brüschweiler; Axel Munk; Stefan Becker; Jens Meiler; Christian Griesinger
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix-coil transition of polypeptides.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  A composite approach towards a complete model of the myosin rod.

Authors:  E Nihal Korkmaz; Keenan C Taylor; Michael P Andreas; Guatam Ajay; Nathan T Heinze; Qiang Cui; Ivan Rayment
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-12-09

10.  ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB.

Authors:  James A Maier; Carmenza Martinez; Koushik Kasavajhala; Lauren Wickstrom; Kevin E Hauser; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.