| Literature DB >> 29109701 |
Rakesh Mogul1,2, Parag Vaishampayan2,3,4, Mina Bashir2,4,5, Chris P McKay2,6, Keith Schubert2,7, Rosalba Bornaccorsi2,8, Ernesto Gomez2,9, Sneha Tharayil10,11, Geoffrey Payton11,12, Juliana Capra11,13, Jessica Andaya1,14, Leonard Bacon14,15, Emily Bargoma4,14, David Black14,16, Katie Boos10,14, Michaela Brant10,14, Michael Chabot1,14, Danny Chau12,14, Jessica Cisneros4,14, Geoff Chu6,14, Jane Curnutt7,14, Jessica DiMizio14,17, Christian Engelbrecht14,18, Caroline Gott1,14, Raechel Harnoto14,17, Ruben Hovanesian1,14, Shane Johnson14,17, Britne Lavergne14,18, Gabriel Martinez1,14, Paul Mans6,14, Ernesto Morales1,14, Alex Oei1,14, Gary Peplow14,19, Ryan Piaget6,14, Nicole Ponce14,18, Eduardo Renteria1,14, Veronica Rodriguez1,14, Joseph Rodriguez1,14, Monica Santander1,14, Khamille Sarmiento1,14, Allison Scheppelmann14,17, Gavin Schroter14,17, Devan Sexton1,14, Jenin Stephenson14,18, Kristin Symer14,17, Tatiane Russo-Tait14,18, Bill Weigel1,14, Mary B Wilhelm6,14.
Abstract
In this study, we expand upon the biogeography of biological soilEntities:
Keywords: bacterial diversity; biochemistry; biological soil crusts; metals; subsurface; surface coverage; topsoil; vertical column
Year: 2017 PMID: 29109701 PMCID: PMC5660283 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Bacterial compositions for BSCs from the southwestern United States; compositions of BSCs from the central Mojave Desert were measured using next generation sequencing (this study), while BSCs from the Sonoran Desert and Colorado Plateau were measured by Nagy et al. (2005) by Sanger sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons (Nagy et al., 2005).
| Central Mojave [next generation sequencing] | Sonoran Desert [16S rRNA ampliconsa] | Colorado Plateau [16S rRNA ampliconsa] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topsoil | Subsurface | Topsoil | Topsoil | ||||
| Cyanobacteria | 33 ± 8% | Proteobacteria | 23 ± 5% | Cyanobacteria | 55% | Cyanobacteria | 38% |
| Proteobacteria | 26 ± 6% | Actinobacteria | 20 ± 5% | Actinobacteria | 15% | Proteobacteria | 16% |
| Chloroflexi | 12 ± 4% | Chloroflexi | 18 ± 3% | Proteobacteria | 14% | Actinobacteria | 12% |
| Actinobacteria | 9 ± 1% | Cyanobacteria | 11 ± 10% | Acidobacteria | 11% | Bacteroidetes | 11% |
| Bacteroidetes | 6 ± 2% | Acidobacteria | 10 ± 2% | Bacteroidetes | 0.9% | Firmicutes/Bacilli | 5% |
| Acidobacteria | 4 ± 1% | Bacteroidetes | 6 ± 2% | Chloroflexi | 0.7% | Thermomicrobiales | 3% |
| FBP | 3 ± 1% | FBP | 4 ± 1% | Gemmatimonadetes | 0.7% | Acidobacteria | 3% |
| Gemmatimonadetes | 3 ± 1% | Gemmatimonadetes | 3 ± 1% | Deinococcus/Thermus | 0.2% | Unaffiliated Alleles | 13% |
| Armatimonadetes | 1 ± 0.3% | Armatimonadetes | 2 ± 0.5% | Unknown | 2.7% | ||
| Planctomycetes | 0.6 ± 0.2% | Planctomycetes | 1 ± 0.3% | ||||
| TM7 | 0.2 ± 0.1% | Nitrospirae | 0.6 ± 0.2% | ||||
| TM7 | 0.3 ± 0.2% | ||||||
| Chlorobi | 0.2 ± 0.1% | ||||||
| Verrucomicrobia | 0.2 ± 0.1% | ||||||
Selected physical and chemical properties of BSCs and control soils.
| Sample | Texture | Sand | Clay | Silt | EC (S/m) | C:N Ratio | Moisture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High (H) | Sandy loam | 59% | 12% | 29% | 0.70 | 1.69 | 11.04% |
| Intermediate (I) | Sandy loam | 67% | 10% | 23% | 0.43 | 3.34 | 6.97% |
| Low (L) | Sandy loam | 77% | 8% | 16% | 0.55 | 4.08 | 6.69% |
| Control (H) | Loamy sand | 83% | 6% | 11% | – | – | – |
| Control (I) | Loamy sand | 87% | 6% | 7% | – | – | – |
| Control (L) | Loamy sand | 86% | 6% | 9% | – | – | – |
Selected elemental compositions (ppm) of BSCs and adjacent control soils, including an indications of trends, where values in bold denote positive or negative correlations with BSC surface coverage, values in italics indicate enriched elemental abundances when compared to respective control soils, and underlined values denote high abundance elements at the low-density (BDL, below the detection limit).
| Atomic number | 5 | 16 | 20 | 22 | 24 | 25 | 27 | 28 | 33 | 42 | 56 | 82 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High (H) | 12 | 0.5 | ||||||||||
| Intermediate (I) | 10 | 0.6 | ||||||||||
| Low (L) | 91 | 0.6 | ||||||||||
| Control (H) | 56 | 4409 | 761 | 27 | 198 | 4.5 | 0.1 | 68 | ||||
| Control (I) | 31 | 4374 | 594 | 52 | 160 | 3.8 | BDL | 37 | ||||
| Control (L) | 56 | 40 | BDL | 66 | ||||||||
Comparison of total sequences and measured OTU values across the transect (OTU was defined as a group of sequences with a similarity of 97% or more).
| Total sequences | Total OTU | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Topsoil | Subsurface | Topsoil | Subsurface |
| High | 2120 ± 91 | 3060 ± 1444 | 585 ± 25 | 867 ± 213 |
| Intermediate | 1866 ± 38 | 1996 ± 141 | 484 ± 15 | 622 ± 80 |
| Low | 2629 ± 1284 | 2729 ± 1340 | 557 ± 172 | 826 ± 238 |