Jonathan Clavell-Hernández1, Clay Martin2, Run Wang3. 1. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center-McGovern Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center-McGovern Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center-McGovern Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: run.wang@uth.tmc.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The sexual problem after radical prostatectomy (RP) that has received the most focus in the current literature is erectile dysfunction. However, there are orgasmic complications that encompass orgasm-associated urinary incontinence (climacturia), anorgasmia, changes in orgasmic sensation, and painful orgasm (dysorgasmia). Although the body of research is still growing, there remains a need for physician and patient awareness of these potentially problematic complications. AIM: To review the prevalence and management options for different orgasmic dysfunctions after RP. METHODS: A Medline PubMed search was used to identify articles related to orgasmic dysfunction, including climacturia, dysorgasmia, anorgasmia, and altered sensation after RP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Rates and types of orgasmic dysfunction after RP. RESULTS: Orgasmic dysfunction encompasses a series of conditions that affect men after RP. These include climacturia, dysorgasmia, anorgasmia, and altered sensation. Although the etiologies and management options remain uncertain, their effect on the sexual health of patients is not negligible. CONCLUSION: To provide proper counseling to patients, physicians should be aware of the prevalence of orgasmic side effects after RP. Post-prostatectomy sexual recovery should be focused not only on penile erectile function but also on a satisfactory and healthy sexual life for patients and their partners. Clavell-Hernández J, Martin C, Wang R. Orgasmic Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: Review of Current Literature. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:124-134.
INTRODUCTION: The sexual problem after radical prostatectomy (RP) that has received the most focus in the current literature is erectile dysfunction. However, there are orgasmic complications that encompass orgasm-associated urinary incontinence (climacturia), anorgasmia, changes in orgasmic sensation, and painful orgasm (dysorgasmia). Although the body of research is still growing, there remains a need for physician and patient awareness of these potentially problematic complications. AIM: To review the prevalence and management options for different orgasmic dysfunctions after RP. METHODS: A Medline PubMed search was used to identify articles related to orgasmic dysfunction, including climacturia, dysorgasmia, anorgasmia, and altered sensation after RP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Rates and types of orgasmic dysfunction after RP. RESULTS:Orgasmic dysfunction encompasses a series of conditions that affect men after RP. These include climacturia, dysorgasmia, anorgasmia, and altered sensation. Although the etiologies and management options remain uncertain, their effect on the sexual health of patients is not negligible. CONCLUSION: To provide proper counseling to patients, physicians should be aware of the prevalence of orgasmic side effects after RP. Post-prostatectomy sexual recovery should be focused not only on penile erectile function but also on a satisfactory and healthy sexual life for patients and their partners. Clavell-Hernández J, Martin C, Wang R. Orgasmic Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: Review of Current Literature. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:124-134.
Authors: Melissa K Hyde; Melissa Opozda; Kirstyn Laurie; Andrew D Vincent; John L Oliffe; Christian J Nelson; Jeff Dunn; Eric Chung; Michael Gillman; Rustom P Manecksha; Gary Wittert; Suzanne K Chambers Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-09-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Alexander B Nolsøe; Christian Fuglesang S Jensen; Peter B Østergren; Mikkel Fode Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 2.896
Authors: Ioannis Mykoniatis; Koenraad van Renterghem; Ioannis Sokolakis; Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Maxime Sempels; Robert Andrianne Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2020-03-17 Impact factor: 2.896