Literature DB >> 29108850

Tissue viscoelasticity is related to tissue composition but may not fully predict the apparent-level viscoelasticity in human trabecular bone - An experimental and finite element study.

X Ojanen1, P Tanska2, M K H Malo2, H Isaksson3, S P Väänänen4, A P Koistinen5, L Grassi3, S P Magnusson6, S M Ribel-Madsen7, R K Korhonen4, J S Jurvelin2, J Töyräs4.   

Abstract

Trabecular bone is viscoelastic under dynamic loading. However, it is unclear how tissue viscoelasticity controls viscoelasticity at the apparent-level. In this study, viscoelasticity of cylindrical human trabecular bone samples (n=11, male, age 18-78 years) from 11 proximal femurs were characterized using dynamic and stress-relaxation testing at the apparent-level and with creep nanoindentation at the tissue-level. In addition, bone tissue elasticity was determined using scanning acoustic microscope (SAM). Tissue composition and collagen crosslinks were assessed using Raman micro-spectroscopy and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), respectively. Values of material parameters were obtained from finite element (FE) models by optimizing tissue-level creep and apparent-level stress-relaxation to experimental nanoindentation and unconfined compression testing values, respectively, utilizing the second order Prony series to depict viscoelasticity. FE simulations showed that tissue-level equilibrium elastic modulus (Eeq) increased with increasing crystallinity (r=0.730, p=.011) while at the apparent-level it increased with increasing hydroxylysyl pyridinoline content (r=0.718, p=.019). In addition, the normalized shear modulus g1 (r=-0.780, p=.005) decreased with increasing collagen ratio (amide III/CH2) at the tissue-level, but increased (r=0.696, p=.025) with increasing collagen ratio at the apparent-level. No significant relations were found between the measured or simulated viscoelastic parameters at the tissue- and apparent-levels nor were the parameters related to tissue elasticity determined with SAM. However, only Eeq, g2 and relaxation time τ1 from simulated viscoelastic values were statistically different between tissue- and apparent-levels (p<.01). These findings indicate that bone tissue viscoelasticity is affected by tissue composition but may not fully predict the macroscale viscoelasticity in human trabecular bone.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collagen crosslink; Composition; Finite element modeling; Trabecular bone; Viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29108850     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

Review 1.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  The relationship of whole human vertebral body creep to bone density and texture via clinically available imaging modalities.

Authors:  Daniel Oravec; Woong Kim; Michael J Flynn; Yener N Yeni
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Standardizing compression testing for measuring the stiffness of human bone.

Authors:  S Zhao; M Arnold; S Ma; R L Abel; J P Cobb; U Hansen; O Boughton
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 4.  A Review on Recent Advances in the Constitutive Modeling of Bone Tissue.

Authors:  Dieter H Pahr; Andreas G Reisinger
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 5.  Embracing Mechanobiology in Next Generation Organ-On-A-Chip Models of Bone Metastasis.

Authors:  Ellen E Slay; Fiona C Meldrum; Virginia Pensabene; Mahetab H Amer
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2021-09-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.