Literature DB >> 2910608

Percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Review of 100 patients and current practice.

P Kambin1, J L Schaffer.   

Abstract

In a prospective study, 100 patients with 102 herniations of the nucleus pulposus at L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 and unremitting radicular pain were treated by percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Ninety-three patients were available for follow-up examination. Three patients had died, and four patients could not be located for this review, but all had been followed for more than one year postoperatively and were judged to have had an excellent result at the time of the last follow-up examination. Fifty-nine patients have been followed for longer than two years postoperatively, with a maximum follow-up period of six years. Evaluations were based on modified MacNab criteria and patient interview, questionnaire, and examination. Eighty-one patients (87%) were judged to be successes, since they were pain-free and had returned to gainful employment and their preinjury activity levels. Twelve patients' operations (13%) were judged to be failures and required repeat surgical procedures at the level of the presenting pathologic condition. Three patients (not included in the follow-up group) died of unrelated causes; they had been followed for a minimum of 15 months postoperatively and were previously judged to have had an excellent result. No major complications, including superficial or deep infections, discitis, or neurovascular compromise, were encountered. Meticulous selection of patients for percutaneous lumbar discectomy is the key to success with the method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2910608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  32 in total

1.  Percutaneous cervical disc decompression.

Authors:  Klaus Birnbaum
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Percutaneous discectomy.

Authors:  J M Morris
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-08

3.  Discomanometry in lumbar intervertebral discs: an experimental study.

Authors:  N Boos; M Isotalo; P Witschger; M Angst; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Clinical efficacy of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of low-back pain disorders.

Authors:  N Boos; P H Lander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  [Endoscopic nucleotomy - Renaissance of a procedure. State of the art].

Authors:  H Leu
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Return to play in professional baseball players following transforaminal endoscopic decompressive spine surgery under local anesthesia.

Authors:  Toru Maeda; Nobutoshi Takamatsu; Ayaka Hashimoto; Yasuyuki Omichi; Kosuke Sugiura; Yoshihiro Ishihama; Hiroaki Manabe; Kazuta Yamashita; Yoichiro Takata; Toshinori Sakai; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

7.  Technology advancements in spinal endoscopy for staged management of painful spine conditions.

Authors:  Friedrich Tieber; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

8.  Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Combined With an Interspinous Process Distraction System for Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Carolina Ramírez Martínez; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; José Gabriel Rugeles Ortíz; Gabriel Oswaldo Alonso Cuéllar; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

9.  Identifying pathogens of spondylodiscitis: percutaneous endoscopy or CT-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Shih-Chieh Yang; Tsai-Sheng Fu; Lih-Huei Chen; Wen-Jer Chen; Yuan-Kun Tu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: clinical and quality of life outcomes with a minimum 2 year follow-up.

Authors:  Chan Wb Peng; William Yeo; Seang B Tan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.