Literature DB >> 33122183

Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Combined With an Interspinous Process Distraction System for Spinal Stenosis.

Carolina Ramírez Martínez1,2, Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski3,4, José Gabriel Rugeles Ortíz1,2,3, Gabriel Oswaldo Alonso Cuéllar1,2,3, Jorge Felipe Ramírez León1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The combination of the percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) with an interspinous process distraction system (IPS) may offer additional benefit in the treatment of spinal stenosis in patients who have failed nonsurgical treatment.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 33 patients diagnosed with lumbar stenosis and radiculopathy and treated them with transforaminal endoscopic lumbar decompression between 2013 and 2017. Primary outcome measures were modified Macnab as well as preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) criteria and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Only patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included.
RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were treated with a combination of PTED and percutaneous IPS (group A), and 5 patients were treated with PTED and mini-open IPS (group B). In group A patients, there was a 4.48 reduction in the VAS score. The ODI changed from 50.25 preoperatively to 18.2 postoperatively, and excellent and good Macnab outcomes were obtained in 78% of patients. In group B patients, the mean VAS reduction was 5.2 points. The ODI changed from 44.34 preoperatively to 14.62 postoperatively, and 80% of group B patients achieved excellent and good Macnab outcomes. No complications related to PTED or IPS were observed throughout the 2-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of IPS to the PTED procedure in select patients may offer additional benefits to patients being treated for lumbar lateral stenosis and foraminal stenosis with low-grade spondylolisthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Feasibility study. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Copyright © 2020 ISASS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic spine surgery; interspinous process distraction; lumbar lateral recess and foraminal stenosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33122183      PMCID: PMC7735475          DOI: 10.14444/7121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  35 in total

Review 1.  Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements.

Authors:  Alex Alfieri; Roberto Gazzeri; Julian Prell; Christian Scheller; Jens Rachinger; Christian Strauss; Andreas Schwarz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Endoscopic transforaminal nucleotomy with foraminoplasty for lumbar disk herniation.

Authors:  Michael Schubert; Thomas Hoogland
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Use of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Authors:  J Fairbank
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The surgery of lumbar disc degeneration.

Authors:  I Macnab
Journal:  Surg Annu       Date:  1976

5.  Early and staged endoscopic management of common pain generators in the spine.

Authors:  Anthony Yeung; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

6.  Failure rates and complications of interspinous process decompression devices: a European multicenter study.

Authors:  Roberto Gazzeri; Marcelo Galarza; Massimiliano Neroni; Claudio Fiore; Andrea Faiola; Fabrizio Puzzilli; Giorgio Callovini; Alex Alfieri
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a "satisfactory symptom state" in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine-a Spine Tango registry-based study.

Authors:  Miranda L van Hooff; Anne F Mannion; Lukas P Staub; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Jeremy C T Fairbank
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  A review of interspinous fusion devices: High complication, reoperation rates, and costs with poor outcomes.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-01-21

9.  Utilization of Interspinous Devices Throughout the United States Over a Recent Decade: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Joseph L Laratta; Hemant Reddy; Joseph M Lombardi; Jamal N Shillingford; Comron Saifi; Charla R Fischer; Ronald A Lehman; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-09-14

10.  Five-year clinical outcomes with endoscopic transforaminal foraminoplasty for symptomatic degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine: a comparative study of inside-out versus outside-in techniques.

Authors:  Anthony Yeung; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.