Hilda Razzaghi1,2, Mona Saraiya1, Trevor D Thompson1, S Jane Henley1, Laura Viens1, Reda Wilson1. 1. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Epidemic Intelligence Service Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines can potentially prevent greater than 90% of cervical and anal cancers as well as a substantial proportion of vulvar, vaginal, penile, and oropharyngeal cancers caused by certain HPV types. Because more than 38,000 HPV-associated cancers are diagnosed annually in the United States, current studies are needed to understand how relative survival varies for each of these cancers by certain demographic characteristics, such as race and age. METHODS: The authors examined high-quality data from 27 population-based cancer registries covering approximately 59% of the US population. The analyses were limited to invasive cancers that were diagnosed during 2001 through 2011 and followed through 2011 and met specified histologic criteria for HPV-associated cancers. Five-year relative survival was calculated from diagnosis until death for these cancers by age, race, and sex. RESULTS: The 5-year age-standardized relative survival rate was 64.2% for cervical carcinomas, 52.8% for vaginal squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), 66% for vulvar SCCs, 47.4% for penile SCCs, 65.9% for anal SCCs, 56.2% for rectal SCCs, and 51.2% for oropharyngeal SCCs. Five-year relative survival was consistently higher among white patients compared with black patients for all HPV-associated cancers across all age groups; the greatest differences by race were observed for oropharyngeal SCCs among those aged <60 years and for penile SCCs among those ages 40 to 49 years compared with other age groups. CONCLUSIONS: There are large disparities in relative survival among patients with HPV-associated cancers by sex, race, and age. HPV vaccination and improved access to screening (of cancers for which screening tests are available) and treatment, especially among groups that experience higher incidence and lower survival, may reduce disparities in survival from HPV-associated cancers. Cancer 2018;124:203-211. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
BACKGROUND:Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines can potentially prevent greater than 90% of cervical and anal cancers as well as a substantial proportion of vulvar, vaginal, penile, and oropharyngeal cancers caused by certain HPV types. Because more than 38,000 HPV-associated cancers are diagnosed annually in the United States, current studies are needed to understand how relative survival varies for each of these cancers by certain demographic characteristics, such as race and age. METHODS: The authors examined high-quality data from 27 population-based cancer registries covering approximately 59% of the US population. The analyses were limited to invasive cancers that were diagnosed during 2001 through 2011 and followed through 2011 and met specified histologic criteria for HPV-associated cancers. Five-year relative survival was calculated from diagnosis until death for these cancers by age, race, and sex. RESULTS: The 5-year age-standardized relative survival rate was 64.2% for cervical carcinomas, 52.8% for vaginal squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), 66% for vulvar SCCs, 47.4% for penile SCCs, 65.9% for anal SCCs, 56.2% for rectal SCCs, and 51.2% for oropharyngeal SCCs. Five-year relative survival was consistently higher among white patients compared with black patients for all HPV-associated cancers across all age groups; the greatest differences by race were observed for oropharyngeal SCCs among those aged <60 years and for penile SCCs among those ages 40 to 49 years compared with other age groups. CONCLUSIONS: There are large disparities in relative survival among patients with HPV-associated cancers by sex, race, and age. HPV vaccination and improved access to screening (of cancers for which screening tests are available) and treatment, especially among groups that experience higher incidence and lower survival, may reduce disparities in survival from HPV-associated cancers. Cancer 2018;124:203-211. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Mona Saraiya; Elizabeth R Unger; Trevor D Thompson; Charles F Lynch; Brenda Y Hernandez; Christopher W Lyu; Martin Steinau; Meg Watson; Edward J Wilkinson; Claudia Hopenhayn; Glenn Copeland; Wendy Cozen; Edward S Peters; Youjie Huang; Maria Sibug Saber; Sean Altekruse; Marc T Goodman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Djenaba A Joseph; Jacqueline W Miller; Xiaocheng Wu; Vivien W Chen; Cyllene R Morris; Marc T Goodman; Jose M Villalon-Gomez; Melanie A Williams; Rosemary D Cress Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Carole Fakhry; William H Westra; Sigui Li; Anthony Cmelak; John A Ridge; Harlan Pinto; Arlene Forastiere; Maura L Gillison Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Meredith S Shiels; Aimée R Kreimer; Anna E Coghill; Teresa M Darragh; Susan S Devesa Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Brenda K Edwards; Anne-Michelle Noone; Angela B Mariotto; Edgar P Simard; Francis P Boscoe; S Jane Henley; Ahmedin Jemal; Hyunsoon Cho; Robert N Anderson; Betsy A Kohler; Christie R Eheman; Elizabeth M Ward Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Marc T Goodman; Mona Saraiya; Trevor D Thompson; Martin Steinau; Brenda Y Hernandez; Charles F Lynch; Christopher W Lyu; Edward J Wilkinson; Thomas Tucker; Glenn Copeland; Edward S Peters; Sean Altekruse; Elizabeth R Unger Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Martin Steinau; Mona Saraiya; Marc T Goodman; Edward S Peters; Meg Watson; Jennifer L Cleveland; Charles F Lynch; Edward J Wilkinson; Brenda Y Hernandez; Glen Copeland; Maria S Saber; Claudia Hopenhayn; Youjie Huang; Wendy Cozen; Christopher Lyu; Elizabeth R Unger Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Sarah A Brendle; Jingwei Li; Nancy M Cladel; Karla K Balogh; Jennifer Booth; Debra A Shearer; Vonn Walter; Song Lu; Neil D Christensen; Danielle Covington; Jake DeBroff; Janice Milici; Yusheng Zhu; Raphael Viscidi; Jiafen Hu Journal: J Virol Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 6.549
Authors: David A Siegel; Jun Li; Helen Ding; Simple D Singh; Jessica B King; Lori A Pollack Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Krupa S Jani; Shou-En Lu; James D Murphy; Paul B Romesser; Krishan R Jethwa; Diana Li; Anupama Chundury; Abraham J Wu; Lara Hathout; Christopher L Hallemeier; Salma K Jabbour Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: David A Siegel; Lisa C Richardson; S Jane Henley; Reda J Wilson; Nicole F Dowling; Hannah K Weir; Eric W Tai; Natasha Buchanan Lunsford Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Ryan Suk; Parag Mahale; Kalyani Sonawane; Andrew G Sikora; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Kathleen M Schmeler; Keith Sigel; Scott B Cantor; Elizabeth Y Chiao; Ashish A Deshmukh Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2018-09-07
Authors: Benjamin D Hallowell; Mona Saraiya; Trevor D Thompson; Elizabeth R Unger; Charles F Lynch; Tom Tucker; Glenn Copeland; Brenda Y Hernandez; Edward S Peters; Edward Wilkinson; Marc T Goodman Journal: JNCI Cancer Spectr Date: 2018-08-11