Literature DB >> 2910517

High-dose melphalan dosage adjustment: possibility of using a test-dose.

B Tranchand1, Y D Ploin, M P Minuit, C Sapet, P Biron, T Philip, C Ardiet.   

Abstract

Previous pharmacokinetic studies of i.v. high-dose melphalan (HDM) have demonstrated large interindividual variations in the pharmacokinetic parameters. We therefore studied the possibility of using a test dose of the drug to determine the level of a subsequent therapeutic dose. This study was undertaken to establish whether the pharmacokinetics of melphalan were linear and reproducible within the same patient and determine whether a linear extrapolation could be carried out from the test dose. The first eight patients were studied on two occasions separated by 2 hours (repeatability stage). Although reasonable evidence for linear pharmacokinetics was obtained from these patients, the data suggested a number of factors that might have introduced errors. Therefore, the second group of ten patients were treated on a slightly different protocol on two occasions 24 h apart (linearity stage). The ratios of the two doses ranged from 1 to 8 (repeatability stage) and from 2.6 to 10 (linearity stage). During both stages there was a good correlation between the AUC measured for the second infusion and that predicted from the first (r = 0.929 and r = 0.943, respectively). We conclude that a test dose can be used to determine the subsequent dose of melphalan necessary to produce a desired AUC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2910517     DOI: 10.1007/BF00273524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  15 in total

1.  Dose of gentamicin in patients with normal renal function and renal impairment.

Authors:  J C Gingell; P M Waterworth
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1968-04-06

2.  Predicting phenytoin dose - a revised nomogram.

Authors:  B Rambeck; H E Boenigk; A Dunlop; P W Mullen; J Wadsworth; A Richens
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.681

3.  Multiple-dosing drug kinetics: Nomographic method of estimating the number of doses needed to approach within a fixed percent of asymptotic minimum drug level.

Authors:  B E Ballard; E Menczel
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Predicting individual phenytoin dosage.

Authors:  S Vozeh; K T Muir; L B Sheiner; F Follath
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-04

5.  Letter: Phenytoin dosage nomogram.

Authors:  L Lund; G Alvan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-12-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Gentamicin therapy in renal failure: a nomogram for dosage.

Authors:  R A Chan; E J Benner; P D Hoeprich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Steady-state pharmacokinetics of phenytoin from routinely collected patient data.

Authors:  T H Grasela; L B Sheiner; B Rambeck; H E Boenigk; A Dunlop; P W Mullen; J Wadsworth; A Richens; T Ishizaki; K Chiba
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Pharmacokinetics of high-dose intravenous melphalan in children and adults with forced diuresis. Report in 26 cases.

Authors:  C Ardiet; B Tranchand; P Biron; P Rebattu; T Philip
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Test dose for predicting high-dose methotrexate infusions.

Authors:  I G Kerr; J Jolivet; J M Collins; J C Drake; B A Chabner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Marrow autotransplantation accelerates haematological recovery in patients with malignant melanoma treated with high-dose melphalan.

Authors:  T J McElwain; D W Hedley; G Burton; H M Clink; M Y Gordon; M Jarman; C A Juttner; J L Millar; R A Milsted; G Prentice; I E Smith; D Spence; M Woods
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Not too little, not too much-just right! (Better ways to give high dose melphalan).

Authors:  P J Shaw; C E Nath; H M Lazarus
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Population pharmacokinetics of carboplatin, etoposide and melphalan in children: a re-evaluation of paediatric dosing formulas for carboplatin in patients with normal or mild impairment of renal function.

Authors:  J K Duong; G J Veal; C E Nath; P J Shaw; J Errington; R Ladenstein; A V Boddy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Population Pharmacokinetics and Optimal Sampling Strategy for Model-Based Precision Dosing of Melphalan in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Kana Mizuno; Min Dong; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Sharat Chandra; Parinda A Mehta; Scott McConnell; Elias J Anaissie; Alexander A Vinks
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Development of a method for clinical pharmacokinetic testing to allow for targeted Melphalan dosing in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous transplant.

Authors:  Karen Sweiss; Bhaskar Vemu; Craig C Hofmeister; Eric Wenzler; Gregory Sampang Calip; John P Galvin; Nadim Mahmud; Damiano Rondelli; Jeremy James Johnson; Pritesh Patel
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Melphalan pharmacokinetics in children with malignant disease: influence of body weight, renal function, carboplatin therapy and total body irradiation.

Authors:  Christa E Nath; Peter J Shaw; Kay Montgomery; John W Earl
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Busulfan disposition and hepatic veno-occlusive disease in children undergoing bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  G Vassal; S Koscielny; D Challine; D Valteau-Couanet; I Boland; A Deroussent; J Lemerle; A Gouyette; O Hartmann
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 7.  Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Chatelut; S Guichard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Benefits of pharmacological knowledge in the design and monitoring of cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Gamelin; G Vassal; J Robert
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Generic Melphalan Is Comparable to Innovator Formulation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Aswin Anand Pai; Anup J Devasia; John Carl Panetta; Sathya Mani; Raveen Stephen Stallon Illangeswaran; Ezhilpavai Mohanan; Balaji Balakrishnan; Kavitha M Lakshmi; Uday Kulkarni; Fouzia N Aboobacker; Anu Korula; Aby Abraham; Alok Srivastava; Vikram Mathews; Biju George; Poonkuzhali Balasubramanian
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2019-10-04

10.  A Phase I New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Study of Buthionine Sulfoximine and Melphalan With Autologous Stem Cells for Recurrent/Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Judith G Villablanca; Samuel L Volchenboum; Hwangeui Cho; Min H Kang; Susan L Cohn; Clarke P Anderson; Araz Marachelian; Susan Groshen; Denice Tsao-Wei; Katherine K Matthay; John M Maris; Charlotte E Hasenauer; Scarlett Czarnecki; Hollie Lai; Fariba Goodarzian; Hiro Shimada; Charles Patrick Reynolds
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.167

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.