Literature DB >> 29104785

Factors affecting one-year survival after radical cystectomy: A prospective study.

Marta Kwiatkowska1, Bartosz Dybowski1, Olga Kuczkiewicz-Siemion1, Rafał Osiecki1, Kaja Śmigielska1, Stefan Gonczar1, Sławomir Poletajew1, Piotr Radziszewski1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Survival after radical cystectomy (RC) is affected by various factors. Significance of preoperative health status and its influence on treatment outcome is uncertain. The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate overall survival, cause of death and the role of comorbidities in mortality during the first 12 months following RC.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients who underwent RC between January 2014 and May 2016 for T1-T4 bladder cancer in a single center were prospectively followed. Stage and comorbidities were explored as predictors of overall survival (OS). Patient status was assessed for at least 12 months.
RESULTS: Follow-up was available for 25 men and 19 women at the mean age 67. Median time of follow-up for survivors was 16 months. Six-month and 1-year OS was 84% and 77%. Out of 11 deaths, 8 were related to cancer progression and 3 patients died for other causes. All deaths apart from one occurred in the first year after surgery. One-year OS was affected mostly by tumor stage: 95% for pT1-2 vs. 62.5% for pT3-4; p = 0.01. Worse outcome was found in patients ≥72 years old, (44% vs. 86%; p = 0.02) and among women (63% vs. 88%; p = 0.07). When patients who died were compared to survivors the following distribution of comorbidities was found: diabetes mellitus - 30.0% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.3; history of stroke - 30.0% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.1; thyroid disease - 30.0% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.3.
CONCLUSIONS: Majority of patients died because cystectomy was performed too late. History of stroke, diabetes mellitus, and thyroid diseases should be assessed as possible risk factors in larger studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bladder cancer; cystectomy; diabetes mellitus; mortality; stroke; thyroid gland

Year:  2017        PMID: 29104785      PMCID: PMC5656372          DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cent European J Urol        ISSN: 2080-4806


INTRODUCTION

Bladder cancer (BC) is a significant global health concern, being the ninth most common cancer with more than 330 000 new cases per year and causing more than 30 000 deaths annually [1]. The incidence of BC is constantly rising and increasing with advancing age [2]. Radical cystectomy (RC) and a pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), followed by urinary diversion is considered the gold-standard treatment for muscle-invasive and high risk non-muscle invasive BC [3]. According to the large analysis on outcomes after RC, the 5-year overall survival (OS) is estimated between 50% and 80%, but it varies when the oncological staging of the disease is concerned [4]. Some of the most significant predictors of overall survival are well known: stage, grade, nodal status, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, smoking habits [5], age [6], general condition status [7], time delay from the first symptoms to surgery [8] and the American Society of Anesthesiologists Score [9]. Recently, searching for predictive models of survival incorporating effects of comorbidities on early survival and perioperative risk have become of broad and current interest [10]. Epidemiological indices for bladder cancer in Poland are disturbing when compared to other European countries and the country ranks second in Europe in terms of mortality [11]. Various factors affecting the early survival have not been investigated meticulously yet. Furthermore, there is no evidence of the prospective analysis concerning this matter performed in Poland. Following the recent retrospective study on the effects of comorbidities on a 5-year overall survival [12], we decided to continue the investigation on factors affecting early survival after RC prospectively. The primary objective was to assess causes of death during the first 12 months after RC. The secondary objective was to evaluate effects of comorbidities on mortality during this period.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients who underwent RC for T1–T4 bladder cancer between January 2014 and May 2016 in a single academic center were prospectively included and followed. Diagnosis of other than invasive bladder cancer (of any histological type) and lack of relevant clinical information about the follow-up during 12 months following RC were exclusion criteria. Preoperative clinical staging of each patient included transurethral resection (TURBT), physical examination, chest and abdominal CT scans. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not used in the specified group as we did not regard existing evidence strong enough to delay surgery. Cystectomy was accompanied by extended bilateral lymphadenectomy (external, internal and common iliac, obturator and presacral lymph nodes) in all cases. Patients with extravesical disease were referred to oncological centers, where adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy was left to the decision of a physician. Ileal conduit was a predominant type of urinary diversion. Staging of all specimens obtained during the surgery was performed according to the 2009 TNM staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer [13]. Grading was established according to the 2004 WHO criteria. Cancer stage and major comorbidities were related to the surgery outcome. The primary endpoint was the 12-month overall survival. Patients status was assessed with abdominal and chest CT scans, blood tests and family reports concerning the progression of the disease and health condition, every 4 to 6 months for at least 12 months. Descriptive analyses were used to characterize the total cohort. The variables that were tested for significance in the analysis are as follow: stage and grade of the tumor, time from the first episode of hematuria to cystectomy, time from the staging resection (or the last resection in case of recurrent tumors) to cystectomy, age, sex, perioperative and postoperative complications, specific comorbidities such as hypertension, congestive heart disease and myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular incidents, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus (DM), moderate or severe renal disease and thyroid disease. Follow-up was completed on April 30th, 2017 and defined as the time between the cystectomy and date of death or date of censoring, whichever came first. Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with survival. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of cystectomy to the date of death. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the survival function, Fischer's exact test and chi-square test were utilized for univariate statistical analysis, with P <0.05 considered statistically significant. Distribution of values for analyzed variables was checked for normality using a Shapiro-Wilk test. When it was proved to be normal, mean and standard deviation values were implemented. If contrary, median values and quartiles in brackets were presented.

RESULTS

In the specified period, 48 patients underwent RC. Four patients were excluded as clinically relevant information was lacking or cystectomy was performed for a reason other than invasive bladder cancer(BC). One patient did not agree for the follow-up CT scan and so the observation ended 6 months following the surgery. Follow-up was available for 25 men and 19 women of the mean age of 67 (46;85). Their clinical and pathological characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Type of urine diversion was not considered as a predicting factor as in 41 patients ileal conduit was performed, while ureterocutaneostomy was used twice and ileal bladder was created in one patient. Adjuvant chemotherapy was used for 10 fit patients with metastases to the nodes or invasion of the adjacent organs, prostate or vagina.
Table 1

Patients’ clinical and pathological characteristics with 1-year overall survival calculated for subgroups

VariableNo of patients1-year OS(%)p-value
Gender
Female1912 (63%)0.07
Male2522 (88%)
Age
≤72 yrs3530 (86%)0.02
>72 yrs94 (44%)
Pathological stage
pT187 (87%)0.01for T1-2 vs. T3-4
pT21212 (100%)
pT3159 (60%)
pT496 (67%)
Lymphnode status
N02924 (83%)0.3for N0 vs. N+
N142 (50%)
N2118 (72%)
Grade
LG44 (100%)0.6
HG4028 (70%)
CIS
Present65 (83%)0.7
Absent3829 (76%)

OS – overall survival

Patients’ clinical and pathological characteristics with 1-year overall survival calculated for subgroups OS – overall survival Median (min-max) of the follow-up for survivors was 16 (12–32) months. Six-month and 12-month overall survival(OS) was available for all patients and reached 84% and 77%, respectively. For 17 patients, follow-up was longer than 18 months and in this group OS was 100%. Out of 11 deaths, 8 were related to cancer progression confirmed in the imaging studies and 3 patients died of other causes. As a result, cancer – specific survival reached 82% after 12 months. All deaths apart from one occurred in the first year after surgery. Characteristics of patients who died are presented in Table 2. Significantly worse outcome was in patients ≥72 years old, and with stage pT3–4. Also a trend was found for a higher mortality rate among women. Median time from hematuria to the surgery (5 months for the whole group), as well as, median time from the last TURBT (2 months for the whole group) was not significantly related with the survival (P = 0.95 and P = 0.5 respectively).
Table 2

Patients who died after radical cystectomy, their cancer characteristics, comorbidities and postoperative complications divided by the cause of death

Sex/AgeTNGrade/TypeOSComorbiditiesPostoperative complications
Cancer – related deaths
M733A2HGUC4COPD, CVA
K803B1HGSSC8
K674A2HGUC6DMWound infection
K853B2HGUC10
M634A2HGUC3
M624A2HGUC13CVA, DM IHDEvisceration
K613A0HGCU10
K654A1HGSSC6ThyrIleal anastomosis dehiscence, wound infection
Other – cause deaths
M783A0HGUC3COPDIleus, Atrial fibrillation, ureteroileal anastomosis leakage, VTE, intra abdominal infection, septic shock
K733A0HGUC1CVE, DM, Thyr, VTEHypovolemic shock, ureteroileal anastomosis leakage, MDR sepsis
K6410HGUC6IHD, Thyr, dialysis

COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVA – cerebro vascular accident; DM – diabetes mellitus; HG – high grade; IHD – ischemic heart disease; MDR – multi drug resistance; SSC – squamous cell carcinoma; Thyr – thyroid disease; UC – urothelial carcinoma; VTE – venous thromboembolism

Patients who died after radical cystectomy, their cancer characteristics, comorbidities and postoperative complications divided by the cause of death COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVA – cerebro vascular accident; DM – diabetes mellitus; HG – high grade; IHD – ischemic heart disease; MDR – multi drug resistance; SSC – squamous cell carcinoma; Thyr – thyroid disease; UC – urothelial carcinoma; VTE – venous thromboembolism When patients who died were compared with survivors the following distribution of comorbidities was found: diabetes mellitus – 30.0% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.3; history of stroke – 30.0% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.1; thyroid disease – 30.0% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.3; ischemic heart disease – 14.7% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.96; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – 20.0% vs. 17.6%, P = 0.84. One-year OS for patients with/without specific comorbidities is shown in Table 3, while Kaplan-Meier curves for chosen variables are presented in Figures 1 and 2.
Table 3

One-year overall survival depending on specific comorbidities and complications. Complication severity was graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification

VariableN (%)1 year overall survival(present vs. absent)p-value
Arterial hypertension3181% vs. 71%0.5
Ischemic heart disease783% vs. 76%1.0
Thyroid disease757% vs. 82%0.3
Chronic obturatory pulmonary disease875% vs. 78%0.8
Chronic renal disease978% vs. 78%1.0
Diabetes mellitus863% vs. 81%0.5
Cerebrovascular event540% vs. 83%0.1
Postoperative complications grade 3–51771% vs. 81%0.5
Figure 1

The Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival related to specific variables: A) tumor stage, B) nodal status, C) diabetes mellitus, D) cerebrovascular event before cystectomy.

Figure 2

The Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival related to specific variables: A) gender, B) age.

One-year overall survival depending on specific comorbidities and complications. Complication severity was graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification The Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival related to specific variables: A) tumor stage, B) nodal status, C) diabetes mellitus, D) cerebrovascular event before cystectomy. The Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival related to specific variables: A) gender, B) age. Intra- and postoperative complications Grade 3–5 in Clavien-Dindo classification occurred in 17 patients (39%), including 6 of 10 patients who died and 11 of 34 survivors (32%). Two patients died as a consequence of sequence of postoperative complications. In both cases, venous thromboembolism was diagnosed either before or after surgery (Table 2). There was only one death related neither to cancer progression nor to postoperative complications. Mean length of postoperative hospital stay was insignificantly longer for patients who died (25 days) than for survivors (19 days).

DISCUSSION

It is suggested that health status considerably affects survival after oncological therapy. However, impact of comorbidities on the outcome of patients after RC is still uncertain. Current literature does not answer whether any comorbidity/performance indices can be used in decisions on management of invasive bladder cancer. Several groups still underline the need of external, prospective validation of such tools [14]. As local factors such as population health status or access to specialized medical centers may influence treatment outcome, we decided to carry out this first prospective analysis of early survival after radical cystectomy in Poland to understand effects of disease stage and comorbidities on poor survival after cystectomy reported in previous Polish studies. Surprisingly, one-year survival reported in this series is significantly higher than in the previous study from our center (77% vs. 58.7%) [12]. More restrictive patient selection according to the disease stage and comorbidities as well as implementation of extended lymphadenectomy in all patients may be responsible for that significant improvement. In the current study special attention was paid to the effect of comorbidities, although disease stage was also investigated. Remarkably, the direct effect of comorbidities was not significant in the first 12 months after surgery as the majority of deaths occurred as a result of BC progression. Small size of the group precluded obtaining significant differences, but it must be stressed that prevalence of three diseases among patients who died was clearly higher that in survivors, that is stroke, DM, and thyroid disease. In the previous study from the same center [12], a strong trend toward significance for association of OS and DM in patients after RC was found with 10% 5-year OS for diabetics. This association was confirmed here with very low, 62% 1-year OS in this group. Recent paper [15] states that the influence of diabetes as a risk factor for BC may be elucidated by detection bias, due to increased urinary screening of patients with albuminuria, but this argument is contrary to our findings. Our unpublished results show no difference in stage, grade, and recurrence rate of primary tumors between diabetics and non-diabetics. Different mechanism must explain worse outcomes after RC with possible immunologic, angiogenic or genetic effects. Difference in frequency of stroke history was even more striking with 30% of affected patients who died and only one case among those who survived. Patients with aggressive cancer frequently have strokes, both from traditional risk factors and from mechanisms unique to malignancy like: hypercoagulability, non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis, direct tumor compression of blood vessels, or treatment-related effects [16]. In our study it was stroke which was first. There are very few studies which discuss the impact of this comorbidity on survival after RC. Recently, in the study presented by Dell'Oglio at al., cerebrovascular disease was proven to be one of the most accurate variables used in the Deyo adaptation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index [17]. Thromboembolism is a settled severe and life-threatening complication of major surgeries, especially in the pelvis [18]. This is not surprising that this condition was mentioned either as a comorbidity or a complication in two out of three non-cancer –related deaths despite heparin-based prophylaxis started the day before surgery and continued for at least four weeks after surgery. Age is not a contraindication nor a comorbidity. There is a number of studies showing comparable RC outcomes in the octogenarian [19]. Despite those studies, in our group age above 72, there was a significant relation to the risk of death. The comparable analysis conveys the similar information, concerning the age of either 75 or 80 as associated with worse survival [14, 20]. Gender is another demographic variable important for postcystectomy outcome prediction. Dramatic difference to the disadvantage of female patients was found in this study, which is consistent with findings from other groups [21, 22]. However, Mitra et al. proved that this was tumor stage at the time of surgery, which was responsible for that difference. When a large cohort of female patients was well-matched with a cohort of male patients, the difference of survival disappeared [23]. Higher stages among women can be explained by some independent variables like age or delayed diagnosis and surgery. Differential diagnosis of hematuria in women may be more troublesome [24]. That is why some authors underline the need to improve the standardization of hematuria evaluation [25]. Tumor stage and node status are always the best predictors of survival. However, in both our studies, node status was not related to survival. Although in all but one cancer death case, metastases to nodes were confirmed, still a large proportion of patients with positive lymph nodes was found among survivors. On the contrary, extension of the tumor beyond the bladder wall brings very high risk of progression and death. It seems that either lymphadenectomy has its positive effect on survival or local growth of the tumor makes the risk of dissemination higher than in case of the lymphatic route. Due to its single – center construction and small number of patients enrolled prospectively, we were not able to reliably confirm the effects of comorbidities on survival after cystectomy. Nevertheless, the main aim which was to evaluate the reasons of a high death rate after cystectomy was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced tumor stage found in more than half of the group was responsible for the progression and was the leading cause of death after RC in our center. The consequence of DM, CVEs and thyroid disease for survival need larger cohorts to be explained. Careful preoperative evaluation, close follow-up implementation, and adjuvant therapy should be considered in elderly patients with advanced disease and those comorbidities.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  20 in total

1.  Advanced age is associated with poorer bladder cancer-specific survival in patients treated with radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Matthew E Nielsen; Shahrokh F Shariat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Yair Lotan; Craig G Rogers; Gilad E Amiel; Patrick J Bastian; Amnon Vazina; Amit Gupta; Seth P Lerner; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Mark P Schoenberg; Ganesh S Palapattu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Comorbidity and performance indices as predictors of cancer-independent mortality but not of cancer-specific mortality after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Roman Mayr; Mattias May; Thomas Martini; Michele Lodde; Evi Comploj; Armin Pycha; Jenny Strobel; Stefan Denzinger; Wolfgang Otto; Wolfgang Wieland; Maximilian Burger; Hans-Martin Fritsche
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients.

Authors:  J P Stein; G Lieskovsky; R Cote; S Groshen; A C Feng; S Boyd; E Skinner; B Bochner; D Thangathurai; M Mikhail; D Raghavan; D G Skinner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Sarcopenia in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy: impact on cancer-specific and all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Sarah P Psutka; Alonso Carrasco; Grant D Schmit; Michael R Moynagh; Stephen A Boorjian; Igor Frank; Suzanne B Stewart; Prabin Thapa; Robert F Tarrell; John C Cheville; Matthew K Tollefson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Comparison of complications from radical cystectomy between old-old versus oldest-old patients.

Authors:  Evi Comploj; Jeremy West; Michael Mian; Luis Alex Kluth; Alexander Karl; Christopher Dechet; Shahrokh F Shariat; Christian G Stief; Emanuela Trenti; Salvatore Palermo; Michele Lodde; Wolfgang Horninger; Stephan Madersbacher; Armin Pycha
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Gender-specific differences in cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy for patients with urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder in pathologic tumor stage T4a.

Authors:  Matthias May; Patrick J Bastian; Sabine Brookman-May; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Derya Tilki; Wolfgang Otto; Christian Bolenz; Christian Gilfrich; Lutz Trojan; Edwin Herrmann; Rudolf Moritz; Arne Tiemann; Stefan C Müller; Jörg Ellinger; Alexander Buchner; Christian G Stief; Wolf F Wieland; Thomas Höfner; Markus Hohenfellner; Axel Haferkamp; Jan Roigas; Mario Zacharias; Philipp Nuhn; Maximilian Burger
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Stroke and Cancer- A Complicated Relationship.

Authors:  Jennifer L Dearborn; Victor C Urrutia; Steven R Zeiler
Journal:  J Neurol Transl Neurosci       Date:  2014

8.  Effect of gender on outcomes following radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a critical analysis of 1,994 patients.

Authors:  Anirban P Mitra; Eila C Skinner; Anne K Schuckman; David I Quinn; Tanya B Dorff; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 9.  Gender and Bladder Cancer: A Collaborative Review of Etiology, Biology, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Jakub Dobruch; Siamak Daneshmand; Margit Fisch; Yair Lotan; Aidan P Noon; Matthew J Resnick; Shahrokh F Shariat; Alexandre R Zlotta; Stephen A Boorjian
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Competing risks of cystectomy - from calculator to decision.

Authors:  Bartosz Dybowski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-03-14
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  TGF-β and microRNA Interplay in Genitourinary Cancers.

Authors:  Joanna Boguslawska; Piotr Kryst; Slawomir Poletajew; Agnieszka Piekielko-Witkowska
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  Diabetes Is a Risk Factor for the Prognosis of Patients with Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lv Dong; Xiang Ying; Song Tao; Zhou Guang-Peng; Shen Tai-Ming
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.501

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.