Literature DB >> 22534059

Comorbidity and performance indices as predictors of cancer-independent mortality but not of cancer-specific mortality after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Roman Mayr1, Mattias May, Thomas Martini, Michele Lodde, Evi Comploj, Armin Pycha, Jenny Strobel, Stefan Denzinger, Wolfgang Otto, Wolfgang Wieland, Maximilian Burger, Hans-Martin Fritsche.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comorbidity and performance indices allow assessment of preoperative health status. However, the optimal tool for use in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) who are undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) has not yet been established.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate correlation of Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE27), Charlson Comorbidity Index, Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score with survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective multicenter study was carried out on 555 unselected consecutive patients who underwent RC for UCB from 2000 to 2010. INTERVENTION: RC with pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with UCB without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Cox regression models were calculated with established variables to assess predictive capacity for cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and cancer-independent mortality (CIM). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All indices were independent predictors for CIM but not for CSM. The ASA score was the only index that significantly increased the predictive accuracy of the predefined CIM model (+2.3%; p=0.045). To create a clinically valuable tool, we devised a weighted prognostic model including age and the best prognosticators within the performance and comorbidity scores (ASA/ACE27 0-1/2-3). A 3-yr CIM rate of 8%, 26%, and 47% was calculated for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. Patients >75 yr of age with ASA 3/4 and ACE27 >1 exhibited a CIM risk seven times greater than patients ≤75 yr with ASA 1/2 and ACE27 0/1. This study is limited by the short follow-up and its retrospective nature.
CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity and performance assessment is mandatory in the preoperative prediction of CIM for patients undergoing RC for UCB. The present results indicate that the ASA score is the tool of choice. External and prospective validation is warranted.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22534059     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  22 in total

1.  Studying the impact of comorbidity on post radical cystectomy survival: have we come a full circle?

Authors:  Subodh K Regmi; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

2.  A meta-analysis of the predictive accuracy of postoperative mortality using the American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status classification system.

Authors:  Chieh Yang Koo; Joseph A Hyder; Jonathan P Wanderer; Matthias Eikermann; Satya Krishna Ramachandran
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Comorbidity and nutritional indices as predictors of morbidity after transurethral procedures: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Massimo Valerio; Yannick Cerantola; Urs Fritschi; Martin Hubner; Katia Iglesias; Anne-Sophie Legris; Ilaria Lucca; Yannis Vlamopoulos; Laurent Vaucher; Patrice Jichlinski
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Which comorbidity classification is best suited to identify patients at risk for 90-day and long-term non-bladder cancer mortality after radical cystectomy?

Authors:  Michael Froehner; Rainer Koch; Ulrike Heberling; Matthias Hübler; Vladimir Novotny; Angelika Borkowetz; Manfred P Wirth; Christian Thomas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  The Impact of Health Literacy on Surgical Outcomes Following Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Kristen R Scarpato; Stephen F Kappa; Kathryn M Goggins; Sam S Chang; Joseph A Smith; Peter E Clark; David F Penson; Matthew J Resnick; Daniel A Barocas; Kamran Idrees; Sunil Kripalani; Kelvin A Moses
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-09-23

6.  Gender-specific survival following radical cystectomy for pT4 bladder cancer.

Authors:  Dharam Kaushik; Igor Frank; Manuel S Eisenberg; John C Cheville; Robert Tarrell; Prabin Thapa; R Houston Thompson; Stephen A Boorjian
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  [Cystectomy in the elderly patient].

Authors:  G Bartsch; K Gust; S Vallo; C Bartsch; I Tsaur; J Mani; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Karnofsky performance status predicts overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and progression-free survival following radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Patrick D Evers; Joshua E Logan; Veronica Sills; Arnold I Chin
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Systematic Review of Comorbidity and Competing-risks Assessments for Bladder Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Ashish M Kamat; Karim Chamie; Michael Froehner; Manfred P Wirth; Peter N Wiklund; Peter C Black; Gary D Steinberg; Stephen A Boorjian; Sia Daneshmand; Peter J Goebell; Kamal S Pohar; Shahrokh F Shariat; George N Thalmann
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-06-06

10.  Competing mortality in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: evidence of undertreatment in the elderly and female patients.

Authors:  A P Noon; P C Albertsen; F Thomas; D J Rosario; J W F Catto
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.