| Literature DB >> 29104293 |
Jason Abaluck1, Leila Agha2, Chris Kabrhel3, Ali Raja4, Arjun Venkatesh5.
Abstract
A large body of research has investigated whether physicians overuse care. There is less evidence on whether, for a fixed level of spending, doctors allocate resources to patients with the highest expected returns. We assess both sources of inefficiency exploiting variation in rates of negative imaging tests for pulmonary embolism. We document enormous across-doctor heterogeneity in testing conditional on patient population, which explains the negative relationship between physicians' testing rates and test yields. Furthermore, doctors do not target testing to the highest risk patients, reducing test yields by one third. Our calibration suggests misallocation is more costly than overuse.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 29104293 PMCID: PMC5665411 DOI: 10.1257/aer.20140260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am Econ Rev ISSN: 0002-8282