Wenyin Shi1, Molly Scannell Bryan2, Mark R Gilbert3, Minesh P Mehta4, Deborah T Blumenthal5, Paul D Brown6, Egils Valeinis7, Kirsten Hopkins8, Luis Souhami9, David W Andrews1, Tzahala Tzuk-Shina10, Steve P Howard11, Emad F Youssef12, Nathalie Lessard13, James J Dignam14, Maria Werner-Wasik15. 1. Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 3. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 4. University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland. 5. Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. 6. University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 7. Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia. 8. Bristol Oncology Center, Bristol, United Kingdom. 9. McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada. 10. Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel. 11. University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin. 12. Saint Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center Accruals for Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Phoenix, Arizona. 13. L'Hotel-Dieu De Quebec, Quebec City, Québec, Canada. 14. Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 15. Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: maria.werner-wasik@jefferson.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the impact on overall survival with different salvage therapies, including no treatment, reirradiation, systemic therapy, or radiation and systemic therapy, in participants of a phase 3 clinical trial evaluating dose-dense versus standard-dose temozolomide for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This analysis of patients from Trial RTOG 0525 investigated the effect of reirradiation or systemic treatment after tumor progression. Survival from first progression was compared between patients receiving no therapy, systemic therapy alone, radiation alone, and both modalities. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the mortality hazard, controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: The analysis included 637 patients who progressed and had information on their management, excluding those who died less than half a month after progression. A total of 267 patients (42%) received neither reirradiation nor systemic treatment at progression, 24 (4%) received radiation alone, 282 (44%) received systemic treatment only, and 64 (10%) received both radiation and systemic therapy. Patients who received no treatment had a median survival of 4.8 months, lower than with radiation treatment alone (8.2 months), systemic therapy alone (10.6 months), and both radiation and systemic therapy (12.2 months). In survival models controlling for potential confounders, those who received radiation alone had modestly better survival (hazard ratio HR 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.28), whereas those who underwent systemic therapy either without (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34-0.53) or with radiation therapy (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30-0.63) had better survival. There was no significant survival difference between patients who received radiation only and those who received systemic therapy (either with radiation or alone). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received no salvage treatment had poorer survival than those who received radiation, chemotherapy, or the combination. However, patient selection for no treatment likely reflects poorer expected prognosis. There was no significant survival difference among those receiving radiation therapy, systemic therapy, or both. Ongoing clinical trials will help define the role of reirradiation after glioblastoma progression.
PURPOSE: To determine the impact on overall survival with different salvage therapies, including no treatment, reirradiation, systemic therapy, or radiation and systemic therapy, in participants of a phase 3 clinical trial evaluating dose-dense versus standard-dose temozolomide for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This analysis of patients from Trial RTOG 0525 investigated the effect of reirradiation or systemic treatment after tumor progression. Survival from first progression was compared between patients receiving no therapy, systemic therapy alone, radiation alone, and both modalities. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the mortality hazard, controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: The analysis included 637 patients who progressed and had information on their management, excluding those who died less than half a month after progression. A total of 267 patients (42%) received neither reirradiation nor systemic treatment at progression, 24 (4%) received radiation alone, 282 (44%) received systemic treatment only, and 64 (10%) received both radiation and systemic therapy. Patients who received no treatment had a median survival of 4.8 months, lower than with radiation treatment alone (8.2 months), systemic therapy alone (10.6 months), and both radiation and systemic therapy (12.2 months). In survival models controlling for potential confounders, those who received radiation alone had modestly better survival (hazard ratio HR 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.28), whereas those who underwent systemic therapy either without (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34-0.53) or with radiation therapy (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30-0.63) had better survival. There was no significant survival difference between patients who received radiation only and those who received systemic therapy (either with radiation or alone). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received no salvage treatment had poorer survival than those who received radiation, chemotherapy, or the combination. However, patient selection for no treatment likely reflects poorer expected prognosis. There was no significant survival difference among those receiving radiation therapy, systemic therapy, or both. Ongoing clinical trials will help define the role of reirradiation after glioblastoma progression.
Authors: A A Brandes; E Scelzi; P Zampieri; A Rigon; A Rotilio; P Amista; F Berti; M V Fiorentino Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Shannon E Fogh; David W Andrews; Jon Glass; Walter Curran; Charles Glass; Colin Champ; James J Evans; Terry Hyslop; Edward Pequignot; Beverly Downes; Eileen Comber; Mitchell Maltenfort; Adam P Dicker; Maria Werner-Wasik Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joshua D Palmer; Joshua Siglin; Kosj Yamoah; Tu Dan; Colin E Champ; Voichita Bar-Ad; Maria Werner-Wasik; James J Evans; Lyndon Kim; Jon Glass; Christopher Farrell; David W Andrews; Wenyin Shi Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-05-30 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Kyle C Cuneo; James J Vredenburgh; John H Sampson; David A Reardon; Annick Desjardins; Katherine B Peters; Henry S Friedman; Christopher G Willett; John P Kirkpatrick Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Michael D Prados; W K Alfred Yung; Howard A Fine; Harry S Greenberg; Larry Junck; Susan M Chang; M Kelly Nicholas; H Ian Robins; Minesh P Mehta; Karen L Fink; Kurt A Jaeckle; John Kuhn; Kenneth R Hess; S Clifford Schold Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Mark R Gilbert; Meihua Wang; Kenneth D Aldape; Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Kurt A Jaeckle; Terri S Armstrong; Jeffrey S Wefel; Minhee Won; Deborah T Blumenthal; Anita Mahajan; Christopher J Schultz; Sara Erridge; Brigitta Baumert; Kristen I Hopkins; Tzahala Tzuk-Shina; Paul D Brown; Arnab Chakravarti; Walter J Curran; Minesh P Mehta Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James J Vredenburgh; Annick Desjardins; James E Herndon; Jennifer Marcello; David A Reardon; Jennifer A Quinn; Jeremy N Rich; Sith Sathornsumetee; Sridharan Gururangan; John Sampson; Melissa Wagner; Leighann Bailey; Darell D Bigner; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Teri N Kreisl; Lyndon Kim; Kraig Moore; Paul Duic; Cheryl Royce; Irene Stroud; Nancy Garren; Megan Mackey; John A Butman; Kevin Camphausen; John Park; Paul S Albert; Howard A Fine Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Philip H Gutin; Fabio M Iwamoto; Kathryn Beal; Nimish A Mohile; Sasan Karimi; Bob L Hou; Stella Lymberis; Yoshiya Yamada; Jenghwa Chang; Lauren E Abrey Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-01-23 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Patrick Y Wen; Michael Weller; Eudocia Quant Lee; Brian M Alexander; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Floris P Barthel; Tracy T Batchelor; Ranjit S Bindra; Susan M Chang; E Antonio Chiocca; Timothy F Cloughesy; John F DeGroot; Evanthia Galanis; Mark R Gilbert; Monika E Hegi; Craig Horbinski; Raymond Y Huang; Andrew B Lassman; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Lim; Minesh P Mehta; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Giuseppe Minniti; David Nathanson; Michael Platten; Matthias Preusser; Patrick Roth; Marc Sanson; David Schiff; Susan C Short; Martin J B Taphoorn; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Jonathan Tsang; Roel G W Verhaak; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; Gelareh Zadeh; David A Reardon; Kenneth D Aldape; Martin J van den Bent Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Dilini S Pinnaduwage; Shiv P Srivastava; Xiangsheng Yan; Shyam Jani; David G Brachman; Stephen P Sorensen Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2022 Jan-Dec
Authors: Christopher H Chapman; Jared H Hara; Annette M Molinaro; Jennifer L Clarke; Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush; Jennie W Taylor; Nicholas A Butowski; Susan M Chang; Shannon E Fogh; Penny K Sneed; Jean L Nakamura; David R Raleigh; Steve E Braunstein Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2019-04-12
Authors: Norbert Galldiks; Maximilian Niyazi; Anca L Grosu; Martin Kocher; Karl-Josef Langen; Ian Law; Giuseppe Minniti; Michelle M Kim; Christina Tsien; Frederic Dhermain; Riccardo Soffietti; Minesh P Mehta; Michael Weller; Jörg-Christian Tonn Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 12.300