Literature DB >> 29101985

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer.

Priscilla J Slanetz1, Linda Moy2, Paul Baron3, Roberta M diFlorio4, Edward D Green5, Samantha L Heller6, Anna I Holbrook7, Su-Ju Lee8, Alana A Lewin6, Ana P Lourenco9, Bethany Niell10, Ashley R Stuckey11, Sunita Trikha12, Nina S Vincoff13, Susan P Weinstein14, Monica M Yepes15, Mary S Newell16.   

Abstract

Patients with locally advanced invasive breast cancers are often treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to definitive surgical intervention. The primary aims of this approach are to: 1) reduce tumor burden thereby permitting breast conservation rather than mastectomy; 2) promptly treat possible metastatic disease, whether or not it is detectable on preoperative staging; and 3) potentially tailor future chemotherapeutic decisions by monitoring in-vivo tumor response. Accurate radiological assessment permits optimal management and planning in this population. However, assessment of tumor size and response to treatment can vary depending on the modality used, the measurement technique (such as single longest diameter, 3-D measurements, or calculated tumor volume), and varied response of different tumor subtypes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (such as concentric shrinkage or tumor fragmentation). As discussed in further detail, digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, US and MRI represent the key modalities with potential to help guide patient management. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; Breast MRI; Breast US; Breast cancer; Mammography; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29101985     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  7 in total

1.  Can We Use MRI and US to Predict Axillary Node Response in Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Gary J Whitman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Advances in Imaging in Evaluating the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xianshu Kong; Qian Zhang; Xuemei Wu; Tianning Zou; Jiajun Duan; Shujie Song; Jianyun Nie; Chu Tao; Mi Tang; Maohua Wang; Jieya Zou; Yu Xie; Zhenhui Li; Zhen Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Endocrine Therapy, and Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline.

Authors:  Larissa A Korde; Mark R Somerfield; Lisa A Carey; Jennie R Crews; Neelima Denduluri; E Shelley Hwang; Seema A Khan; Sibylle Loibl; Elizabeth A Morris; Alejandra Perez; Meredith M Regan; Patricia A Spears; Preeti K Sudheendra; W Fraser Symmans; Rachel L Yung; Brittany E Harvey; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  De-Escalation of Breast Cancer Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Umar Wazir; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2021-12-30

5.  A Novel Combined Nomogram Model for Predicting the Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Breast Carcinoma of No Specific Type: Real-World Study.

Authors:  Xuelin Zhu; Jing Shen; Huanlei Zhang; Xiulin Wang; Huihui Zhang; Jing Yu; Qing Zhang; Dongdong Song; Liping Guo; Dianlong Zhang; Ruiping Zhu; Jianlin Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Beyond N Staging in Breast Cancer: Importance of MRI and Ultrasound-based Imaging.

Authors:  Valerio Di Paola; Giorgio Mazzotta; Vincenza Pignatelli; Enida Bufi; Anna D'Angelo; Marco Conti; Camilla Panico; Vincenzo Fiorentino; Francesco Pierconti; Fleur Kilburn-Toppin; Paolo Belli; Riccardo Manfredi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Predicting pathological axillary lymph node status with ultrasound following neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Signe Borgquist; Lisa Rydén; Ida Skarping; Daniel Förnvik; Sophia Zackrisson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.872

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.