Literature DB >> 29101868

Disinfection and healing effects of 222-nm UVC light on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in mouse wounds.

Kouji Narita1, Krisana Asano2, Yukihiro Morimoto3, Tatsushi Igarashi3, Michael R Hamblin4, Tianhong Dai4, Akio Nakane5.   

Abstract

UVC radiation is known to be highly germicidal. However, exposure to 254-nm-UVC light causes DNA lesions such as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) in human cells, and can induce skin cancer after long-term repeated exposures. It has been reported that short wavelength UVC is absorbed by proteins in the membrane and cytosol, and fails to reach the nucleus of human cells. Hence, irradiation with 222-nm UVC might be an optimum combination of effective disinfection and biological safety to human cells. In this study, the biological effectiveness of 222-nm UVC was investigated using a mouse model of a skin wound infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Irradiation with 222-nm UVC significantly reduced bacterial numbers on the skin surface compared with non-irradiated skin. Bacterial counts in wounds evaluated on days 3, 5, 8 and 12 after irradiation demonstrated that the bactericidal effect of 222-nm UVC was equal to or more effective than 254-nm UVC. Histological analysis revealed that migration of keratinocytes which is essential for the wound healing process was impaired in wounds irradiated with 254-nm UVC, but was unaffected in 222-nm UVC irradiated wounds. No CPD-expressing cells were detected in either epidermis or dermis of wounds irradiated with 222-nm UVC, whereas CPD-expressing cells were found in both epidermis and dermis irradiation with 254-nm UVC. These results suggest that 222-nm UVC light may be a safe and effective way to reduce the rate of surgical site and other wound infections.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  222-nm UVC; CPD; Dermis; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Wound infection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29101868      PMCID: PMC5771808          DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B        ISSN: 1011-1344            Impact factor:   6.252


  30 in total

Review 1.  Current and emerging serious Gram-positive infections.

Authors:  F Menichetti
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 2.  Staphylococcal surgical site infections.

Authors:  Deverick J Anderson; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.982

Review 3.  Epithelial mechanobiology, skin wound healing, and the stem cell niche.

Authors:  Nicholas D Evans; Richard O C Oreffo; Eugene Healy; Philipp J Thurner; Yu Hin Man
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-05-14

Review 4.  UV wavelength-dependent DNA damage and human non-melanoma and melanoma skin cancer.

Authors:  Gerd P Pfeifer; Ahmad Besaratinia
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 5.  Ultraviolet C irradiation: an alternative antimicrobial approach to localized infections?

Authors:  Tianhong Dai; Mark S Vrahas; Clinton K Murray; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Ultraviolet C light for Acinetobacter baumannii wound infections in mice: potential use for battlefield wound decontamination?

Authors:  Tianhong Dai; Clinton K Murray; Mark S Vrahas; David G Baer; George P Tegos; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 7.  Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention.

Authors:  C D Owens; K Stoessel
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 8.  Ultraviolet Radiation in Wound Care: Sterilization and Stimulation.

Authors:  Asheesh Gupta; Pinar Avci; Tianhong Dai; Ying-Ying Huang; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  207-nm UV Light-A Promising Tool for Safe Low-Cost Reduction of Surgical Site Infections. II: In-Vivo Safety Studies.

Authors:  Manuela Buonanno; Milda Stanislauskas; Brian Ponnaiya; Alan W Bigelow; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Yanping Xu; Igor Shuryak; Lubomir Smilenov; David M Owens; David J Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  207-nm UV light - a promising tool for safe low-cost reduction of surgical site infections. I: in vitro studies.

Authors:  Manuela Buonanno; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Alan W Bigelow; Sheetal Trivedi; Franklin D Lowy; Henry M Spotnitz; Scott M Hammer; David J Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

1.  255-nm Light-emitting Diode Kills Enterococcus faecalis and Induces the Production of Cellular Biomarkers in Human Embryonic Palatal Mesenchyme Cells and Gingival Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Kimberly Morio; Emma L Thayer; Amber M Bates; Kim A Brogden
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  DNA Damage Kills Bacterial Spores and Cells Exposed to 222-Nanometer UV Radiation.

Authors:  Willie Taylor; Emily Camilleri; D Levi Craft; George Korza; Maria Rocha Granados; Jaliyah Peterson; Renata Szczpaniak; Sandra K Weller; Ralf Moeller; Thierry Douki; Wendy W K Mok; Peter Setlow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Can light-based approaches overcome antimicrobial resistance?

Authors:  Michael R Hamblin; Heidi Abrahamse
Journal:  Drug Dev Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.360

4.  Re-Evaluation of Rat Corneal Damage by Short-Wavelength UV Revealed Extremely Less Hazardous Property of Far-UV-C.

Authors:  Sachiko Kaidzu; Kazunobu Sugihara; Masahiro Sasaki; Aiko Nishiaki; Hiroyuki Ohashi; Tatsushi Igarashi; Masaki Tanito
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.421

5.  Far-UVC light prevents MRSA infection of superficial wounds in vivo.

Authors:  Brian Ponnaiya; Manuela Buonanno; David Welch; Igor Shuryak; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; David J Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of far ultraviolet light emitted from an optical diffuser on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vitro.

Authors:  David Welch; Manuela Buonanno; Igor Shuryak; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Henry M Spotnitz; David J Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Skin tolerant inactivation of multiresistant pathogens using far-UVC LEDs.

Authors:  Johannes Glaab; Neysha Lobo-Ploch; Hyun Kyong Cho; Thomas Filler; Heiko Gundlach; Martin Guttmann; Sylvia Hagedorn; Silke B Lohan; Frank Mehnke; Johannes Schleusener; Claudia Sicher; Luca Sulmoni; Tim Wernicke; Lucas Wittenbecher; Ulrike Woggon; Paula Zwicker; Axel Kramer; Martina C Meinke; Michael Kneissl; Markus Weyers; Ulrike Winterwerber; Sven Einfeldt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Light as a Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial.

Authors:  Peter J Gwynne; Maurice P Gallagher
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Chronic irradiation with 222-nm UVC light induces neither DNA damage nor epidermal lesions in mouse skin, even at high doses.

Authors:  Kouji Narita; Krisana Asano; Yukihiro Morimoto; Tatsushi Igarashi; Akio Nakane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effectiveness of 222-nm ultraviolet light on disinfecting SARS-CoV-2 surface contamination.

Authors:  Hiroki Kitagawa; Toshihito Nomura; Tanuza Nazmul; Keitaro Omori; Norifumi Shigemoto; Takemasa Sakaguchi; Hiroki Ohge
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 2.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.