Literature DB >> 29101197

Population-Wide Survey of Salmonella enterica Response to High-Pressure Processing Reveals a Diversity of Responses and Tolerance Mechanisms.

Sandeep Tamber1.   

Abstract

High-pressure processing is a nonthermal method of food preservation that uses pressure to inactivate microorganisms. To ensure the effective validation of process parameters, it is important that the design of challenge protocols consider the potential for resistance in a particular species. Herein, the responses of 99 diverse Salmonella enterica strains to high pressure are reported. Members of this population belonged to 24 serovars and were isolated from various Canadian sources over a period of 26 years. When cells were exposed to 600 MPa for 3 min, the average reduction in cell numbers for this population was 5.6 log10 CFU/ml, with a range of 0.9 log10 CFU/ml to 6 log10 CFU/ml. Eleven strains, from 5 serovars, with variable levels of pressure resistance were selected for further study. The membrane characteristics (propidium iodide uptake during and after pressure treatment, sensitivity to membrane-active agents, and membrane fatty acid composition) and responses to stressors (heat, nutrient deprivation, desiccation, and acid) for this panel suggested potential roles for the cell membrane and the RpoS regulon in mediating pressure resistance in S. enterica The data indicate heterogeneous and multifactorial responses to high pressure that cannot be predicted for individual S. enterica strains.IMPORTANCE The responses of foodborne pathogens to increasingly popular minimal food decontamination methods are not understood and therefore are difficult to predict. This report shows that the responses of Salmonella enterica strains to high-pressure processing are diverse. The magnitude of inactivation does not depend on how closely related the strains are or where they were isolated. Moreover, strains that are resistant to high pressure do not behave similarly to other stresses, suggesting that more than one mechanism might be responsible for resistance to high pressure and the mechanisms used may vary from one strain to another. © Crown copyright 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RpoS; Salmonella enterica; high-pressure processing; outer membrane; serovars

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29101197      PMCID: PMC5752854          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01673-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  36 in total

1.  Biosynthetic requirements for the repair of membrane damage in pressure-treated Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P Chilton; N S Isaacs; P Manias; B M Mackey
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 5.277

2.  Growth rates made easy.

Authors:  Barry G Hall; Hande Acar; Anna Nandipati; Miriam Barlow
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Identification of conserved, RpoS-dependent stationary-phase genes of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  H E Schellhorn; J P Audia; L I Wei; L Chang
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Understanding physical inactivation processes: combined preservation opportunities using heat, ultrasound and pressure.

Authors:  R G Earnshaw; J Appleyard; R M Hurst
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.277

5.  Variation in resistance to high hydrostatic pressure and rpoS heterogeneity in natural isolates of Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  M Robey; A Benito; R H Hutson; C Pascual; S F Park; B M Mackey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Genes of Escherichia coli O157:H7 that are involved in high-pressure resistance.

Authors:  Aaron S Malone; Yoon-Kyung Chung; Ahmed E Yousef
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Stress response of Escherichia coli to elevated hydrostatic pressure.

Authors:  T J Welch; A Farewell; F C Neidhardt; D H Bartlett
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  High-pressure resistance variation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains and Salmonella serovars in tryptic soy broth, distilled water, and fruit juice.

Authors:  Brooke M Whitney; Robert C Williams; Joseph Eifert; Joseph Marcy
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.077

Review 9.  The Salmonella enterica pan-genome.

Authors:  Annika Jacobsen; Rene S Hendriksen; Frank M Aaresturp; David W Ussery; Carsten Friis
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Multilocus sequence typing as a replacement for serotyping in Salmonella enterica.

Authors:  Mark Achtman; John Wain; François-Xavier Weill; Satheesh Nair; Zhemin Zhou; Vartul Sangal; Mary G Krauland; James L Hale; Heather Harbottle; Alexandra Uesbeck; Gordon Dougan; Lee H Harrison; Sylvain Brisse
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 6.823

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Peanut Butter Food Safety Concerns-Prevalence, Mitigation and Control of Salmonella spp., and Aflatoxins in Peanut Butter.

Authors:  Tapiwa Reward Sithole; Yu-Xiang Ma; Zhao Qin; Xue-De Wang; Hua-Min Liu
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-24

2.  Genetic Determinants of Stress Resistance in Desiccated Salmonella enterica.

Authors:  Zhiying Wang; Tongbo Zhu; Zhao Chen; Jianghong Meng; David J Simpson; Michael G Gänzle
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Genomic characterization of the most barotolerant Listeria monocytogenes RO15 strain compared to reference strains used to evaluate food high pressure processing.

Authors:  Ilhan Cem Duru; Margarita Andreevskaya; Pia Laine; Tone Mari Rode; Anne Ylinen; Trond Løvdal; Nadav Bar; Peter Crauwels; Christian U Riedel; Florentina Ionela Bucur; Anca Ioana Nicolau; Petri Auvinen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.969

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.