Gregg W Stone1, Alexandre Abizaid2, Yoshinobu Onuma3, Ashok Seth4, Runlin Gao5, John Ormiston6, Takeshi Kimura7, Bernard Chevalier8, Ori Ben-Yehuda9, Ovidiu Dressler10, Tom McAndrew10, Stephen G Ellis11, Dean J Kereiakes12, Patrick W Serruys13. 1. New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; The Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York. Electronic address: gs2184@columbia.edu. 2. Instituto de Cardiologia Dante Pazzanese, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 3. Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center and Cardialysis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 4. Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, New Delhi, India. 5. Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. 6. University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand. 7. Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. 8. Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France. 9. New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; The Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York. 10. The Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York. 11. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 12. The Christ Hospital, Heart and Vascular Center, Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 13. International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Procedural technique may affect clinical outcomes after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation. Prior studies suggesting such a relationship have not adjusted for baseline patient and lesion characteristics that may have influenced operator choice of technique and outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether target lesion failure (TLF) (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) and scaffold thrombosis (ScT) rates within 3 years of BVS implantation are affected by operator technique (vessel size selection and pre- and post-dilation parameters). METHODS:TLF and ScT rates were determined in 2,973 patients with 3,149 BVS-treated coronary artery lesions from 5 prospective studies (ABSORB II, ABSORB China, ABSORB Japan, ABSORB III, and ABSORB Extend). Outcomes through 3 years (and between 0 to 1 and 1 to 3 years) were assessed according to pre-specified definitions of optimal technique (pre-dilation, vessel sizing, and post-dilation). Multivariable analysis was used to adjust for differences in up to 18 patient and lesion characteristics. RESULTS: Optimal pre-dilation (balloon to core laboratory-derived reference vessel diameter ratio ≥1:1), vessel size selection (reference vessel diameter ≥2.25 mm and ≤3.75 mm), and post-dilation (with a noncompliant balloon at ≥18 atm and larger than the nominal scaffold diameter, but not by >0.5 mm larger) in all BVS-treated lesions were performed in 59.2%, 81.6%, and 12.4% of patients, respectively. BVS implantation in properly sized vessels was an independent predictor of freedom from TLF through 1 year (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67; p = 0.01) and through 3 years (HR: 0.72; p = 0.01), and of freedom from ScT through 1 year (HR: 0.36; p = 0.004). Aggressive pre-dilation was an independent predictor of freedom from ScT between 1 and 3 years (HR: 0.44; p = 0.03), and optimal post-dilation was an independent predictor of freedom from TLF between 1 and 3 years (HR: 0.55; p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the present large-scale analysis from the major ABSORB studies, after multivariable adjustment for baseline patient and lesion characteristics, vessel sizing and operator technique were strongly associated with BVS-related outcomes during 3-year follow-up. (ABSORB II Randomized Controlled Trial [ABSORB II]; NCT01425281; ABSORB III Randomized Controlled Trial [RCT] [ABSORB-III]; NCT01751906; A Clinical Evaluation of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold [Absorb BVS] System in Chinese Population-ABSORB CHINA Randomized Controlled Trial [RCT] [ABSORB CHINA]; NCT01923740; ABSORB EXTEND Clinical Investigation [ABSORB EXTEND]; NCT01023789; AVJ-301 Clinical Trial: A Clinical Evaluation of AVJ-301 [Absorb BVS] in Japanese Population [ABSORB JAPAN]; NCT01844284).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Procedural technique may affect clinical outcomes after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation. Prior studies suggesting such a relationship have not adjusted for baseline patient and lesion characteristics that may have influenced operator choice of technique and outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether target lesion failure (TLF) (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) and scaffold thrombosis (ScT) rates within 3 years of BVS implantation are affected by operator technique (vessel size selection and pre- and post-dilation parameters). METHODS: TLF and ScT rates were determined in 2,973 patients with 3,149 BVS-treated coronary artery lesions from 5 prospective studies (ABSORB II, ABSORB China, ABSORB Japan, ABSORB III, and ABSORB Extend). Outcomes through 3 years (and between 0 to 1 and 1 to 3 years) were assessed according to pre-specified definitions of optimal technique (pre-dilation, vessel sizing, and post-dilation). Multivariable analysis was used to adjust for differences in up to 18 patient and lesion characteristics. RESULTS: Optimal pre-dilation (balloon to core laboratory-derived reference vessel diameter ratio ≥1:1), vessel size selection (reference vessel diameter ≥2.25 mm and ≤3.75 mm), and post-dilation (with a noncompliant balloon at ≥18 atm and larger than the nominal scaffold diameter, but not by >0.5 mm larger) in all BVS-treated lesions were performed in 59.2%, 81.6%, and 12.4% of patients, respectively. BVS implantation in properly sized vessels was an independent predictor of freedom from TLF through 1 year (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67; p = 0.01) and through 3 years (HR: 0.72; p = 0.01), and of freedom from ScT through 1 year (HR: 0.36; p = 0.004). Aggressive pre-dilation was an independent predictor of freedom from ScT between 1 and 3 years (HR: 0.44; p = 0.03), and optimal post-dilation was an independent predictor of freedom from TLF between 1 and 3 years (HR: 0.55; p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the present large-scale analysis from the major ABSORB studies, after multivariable adjustment for baseline patient and lesion characteristics, vessel sizing and operator technique were strongly associated with BVS-related outcomes during 3-year follow-up. (ABSORB II Randomized Controlled Trial [ABSORB II]; NCT01425281; ABSORB III Randomized Controlled Trial [RCT] [ABSORB-III]; NCT01751906; A Clinical Evaluation of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold [Absorb BVS] System in Chinese Population-ABSORB CHINA Randomized Controlled Trial [RCT] [ABSORB CHINA]; NCT01923740; ABSORB EXTEND Clinical Investigation [ABSORB EXTEND]; NCT01023789; AVJ-301 Clinical Trial: A Clinical Evaluation of AVJ-301 [Absorb BVS] in Japanese Population [ABSORB JAPAN]; NCT01844284).
Authors: Aydin Huseynov; Stefan Baumann; Holger Nef; Thomas Riemer; Steffen Schneider; Thomas Pfannenbecker; Stephan Achenbach; Julinda Mehilli; Thomas Münzel; Tommaso Gori; Jochen Wöhrle; Ralf Zahn; Johannes Kastner; Axel Schmermund; Gert Richardt; Christian W Hamm; Ibrahim Akin Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-06-29 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Gregg W Stone; Takeshi Kimura; Runlin Gao; Dean J Kereiakes; Stephen G Ellis; Yoshinobu Onuma; Bernard Chevalier; Charles Simonton; Ovidiu Dressler; Aaron Crowley; Ziad A Ali; Patrick W Serruys Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Ruben Y G Tijssen; Laura S M Kerkmeijer; Kuniaki Takahashi; Norihiro Kogame; Yuki Katagiri; Robin P Kraak; Ply Chichareon; Rodrigo Modolo; Taku Asano; Martina Nassif; Deborah N Kalkman; Yohei Sotomi; Carlos Collet; Sjoerd H Hofma; Rene J van der Schaaf; E Karin Arkenbout; Auke P J D Weevers; Jan J Piek; Jan G P Tijssen; Jose P Henriques; Robbert J de Winter; Yoshinobu Onuma; Patrick W Serruys; Joanna J Wykrzykowska Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 2.357