| Literature DB >> 29100506 |
Rajeev K Mehlotra1, D'Arbra Blankenship1, Rosalind E Howes1,2, Tovonahary A Rakotomanga3,4, Brune Ramiranirina4, Stephanie Ramboarina1,4, Thierry Franchard3,4, Marlin H Linger1, Melinda Zikursh-Blood1, Arsène C Ratsimbasoa3,4, Peter A Zimmerman5, Brian T Grimberg6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plasmodium vivax is the most prevalent human malaria parasite and is likely to increase proportionally as malaria control efforts more rapidly impact the prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum. Despite the prominence of P. vivax as a major human pathogen, vivax malaria qualifies as a neglected and under-studied tropical disease. Significant challenges bringing P. vivax into the laboratory, particularly the capacity for long-term propagation of well-characterized strains, have limited the study of this parasite's red blood cell (RBC) invasion mechanism, blood-stage development, gene expression, and genetic manipulation. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: In vitro culture; Madagascar; Plasmodium vivax
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29100506 PMCID: PMC5670718 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-2090-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
In vitro culture and growth characteristics of Malagasy P. vivax isolates
| Isolate | Ampasimpotsy Health Center | Parasitaemia (parasitized RBCs/μL) | Culture initiation (days post- collection) | Culture duration (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014.01 (first) | AMP Central | 6320 | 666 | 233 |
| 2014.01 (second) | 961 | 165 | ||
| 2014.02 | AMP North | 1200 | 454 | 155 |
| 2016.01 | AMP South | 5509 | 298 | 36 |
| 2016.02 | AMP South | 13,359 | 166 | 159 |
Fig. 1In vitro propagation of Plasmodium vivax patient isolate AMP2014.01. The fluctuation in growth of the parasites cultured in complete AIM V medium. Standard blood smear microscopy was performed to monitor parasite growth. Slides were made at intervals ranging from 2 to 15 days. Slides were made either after the medium was changed and the culture was resuspended, or right after the centrifugation to determine lysis and resuspending the pellet into fresh medium, but before adding Saimiri RBCs to readjust the haematocrit to 4%. With the patient parasitaemia of 0.13% on day 0, the culture parasitaemia fluctuated considerably during the first 60 days, and then maintained for the remaining culture period. DNA was extracted from cultured AMP2014.01 on days 86 and 202. PCR amplification and direct sequencing of PvDBP and PvAMA-1 segments was performed at these time points to enable comparison between these sequences and those amplified from the infected patient blood sample prior to in vitro propagation
Fig. 2Plasmodium vivax AMP2014.01 blood smear images. a, b Trophozoite stages observed in the patient blood smear prepared at the time of sample collection. c–f show various infected Saimiri RBCs during 233 days of continuous in vitro culture; c young trophozoite (day 14); d maturing trophozoite (day 26); e doubly infected RBC (day 47), f Schizont (day 180)
Fig. 3Identification and propagation of Plasmodium vivax AMP2014.01-infected human RBCs by flow cytometry. a–c The human glycophorin A (GPA)-specific monoclonal antibody (CD235a) was used to differentiate human RBCs from Saimiri RBCs separately and in mixed cultures. For experiments in a, b host RBCs were not exposed to AMP2014.01; infected Saimiri RBCs were introduced in the experiment shown in c. Assessment of FSC (Y-axis) in all panels further defines gating parameters of GPA− and GPA+ parasitized RBCs. d–f AMP2014.01-infected Saimiri RBCs were mixed with fresh human RBCs and their GPA+/DNA+ cells were identified (top right corner) at time 0, 72, and 144 h. Results show only those human GPA+ RBCs appearing within gating defined in a–c. All controls and experiments were run in triplicate