| Literature DB >> 29100400 |
Ching-Ping Tseng1,2,3,4, Kong-Kit Leong1, Miaw-Jene Liou5, Hsueh-Ling Hsu1, Hung-Chih Lin2, Yi-An Chen1, Jen-Der Lin5.
Abstract
Loco-regional recurrence or distant metastasis usually leads to the death of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Whether or not circulating epithelial cells (CECs) count is a valuable marker in monitoring the therapeutic outcome of PTC was investigated. Patients with PTC (n=129) were treated in our medical center and were categorized into 4 groups with excellent (n=45), biochemical incomplete (n=15), indeterminate (n=37), and structural incomplete (n=32) responses. CECs were enriched from the peripheral blood by the PowerMag negative selection system. Three subtypes of CECs expressing epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR, a marker for thyroid cells), and podoplanin (PDPN, a marker related to poor prognosis in patients with PTC) were defined by immunofluorescence staining, respectively. The median number of CECs (cells/mL of blood) expressing EpCAM, TSHR, and PDPN was 23 (interquartile range 10-61), 19 (interquartile range 8-50), and 8 (interquartile range 3-22), respectively, for patients enrolled in this study. The number of EpCAM+-CECs, TSHR+-CECs, and PDPN+-CECs was statistically different among patients in different treatment response groups without interference from anti-thyroglobulin antibody (P<0.0001). Patients with structural incomplete response had higher counts for all three CECs subtypes when compared to other patients. EpCAM+-CECs was better in distinguishing patients with excellent response from structural incomplete response among the three subtypes of CECs. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay was 84.4% and 95.6%, respectively, when the cut off value was 39 EpCAM+-CECs/mL. CECs testing can supplement the current standard methods for monitoring the therapeutic outcome of PTC.Entities:
Keywords: circulating epithelial cells; epithelial cell adhesion molecule; papillary thyroid carcinoma; podoplanin; therapeutic response
Year: 2017 PMID: 29100400 PMCID: PMC5652792 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20512
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Basic characteristics of enrolled patients with PTC
| Clinical characteristic | Parametersa |
|---|---|
| Patient number | 129 (100.0) |
| Gender | |
| Female | 97 (75.2) |
| Male | 32 (24.8) |
| Age at diagnosis (year) | 44 (32-54) |
| Multifocality | 35 (27.1) |
| Thyroid operative method | |
| Total thyroidectomy | 112 (86.7) |
| Less than total thyroidectomy | 17 (13.3) |
| TNM (AJCC) stage | |
| Stage I | 75 (58.1) |
| Stage II | 15 (11.6) |
| Stage III | 12 (9.3) |
| Stage IV | 27 (21.0) |
| Follow-up period (year)b | 6.7 (3.1-11.9) |
| Accumulative RAIc dose (mCi)b | 130 (60-290) |
| External radiation therapy | 4 (3.1) |
| Concurrent diseases | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 15 (11.6) |
| 2nd primary cancer | 5 (3.9) |
| Response to treatment | |
| Group A: Excellent response | 45 (34.9) |
| Group B: Biochemical incomplete response | 15 (11.6) |
| Group C: Indeterminate response | 37 (28.7) |
| Group D: Structural incomplete response | 32 (24.8) |
aData represent the median (interquartile range of 25% and 75%), n (% of the group), or as indicated.
bData represent the mean (range).
cRAI, radioactive iodide.
Clinical features of PTC patients in different responses to treatment groups
| Clinical characteristica | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient number | 45 | 15 | 37 | 32 | - |
| Gender | |||||
| Female | 35 (77.8) | 13 (86.7) | 27 (73.0) | 22 (68.8) | 0.5660 |
| Male | 10 (22.2) | 2 (13.3) | 10 (27.0) | 10 (31.2) | |
| Age at diagnosis (year) | 45 (36-52) | 43 (31-54) | 37 (30-47) | 53 (43-69) | 0.0004 |
| Multifocality | 10 (22.2) | 7 (46.7) | 8 (21.6) | 10 (31.3) | 0.2321 |
| Thyroid operative method | 0.9233 | ||||
| Total thyroidectomy | 40 (88.9) | 13 (86.7) | 31 (83.8) | 28 (87.5) | |
| Less than total thyroidectomy | 5 (11.1) | 2 (13.3) | 6 (16.2) | 4 (12.5) | |
| TNM (AJCC) stage | < 0.0001 | ||||
| Stage I | 31 (68.9) | 9 (60.0) | 28 (75.7) | 7 (21.8) | |
| Stage II | 7 (15.5) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.4) | 6 (18.8) | |
| Stage III | 4 (8.9) | 2 (13.3) | 3 (8.1) | 3 (9.4) | |
| Stage IV | 3 (6.7) | 4 (26.7) | 4 (10.8) | 16 (50.0) | |
| Follow-up period (year)b | 8.1 (4.5-13.1) | 5.7 (2.5-9.2) | 5.6 (2.5-15.0) | 6.4 (1.9-11.2) | 0.3900 |
| Accumulative RAI dose (mCi)b | 60 (30-90) | 240 (105-1010) | 210 (60-313) | 290 (120-580) | < 0.001 |
| External radiation therapy | - | - | - | 4 (12.5) | - |
| Other diseases | |||||
| Diabetes mellitus | 2 (4.4) | 3 (30.0) | 4 (10.8) | 6 (18.8) | 0.1800 |
| 2nd primary cancer | 2 (4.4) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.4) | 1 (3.1) | 0.8190 |
aData represent the median (interquartile range of 25% and 75%), n (% of the group) or as indicated.
bData represent the mean (range).
Figure 1Isolation and characterization of CECs from patients with PTC
(A-C) CECs were isolated by PowerMag system and analyzed by immunofluorescence staining as described in the Materials and Methods. At least three CECs populations that were positive for EpCAM (panel A, green), TSHR (panel B, green) and PDPN (panel C, red) were defined. Positive staining of Hoechst 33342 (panel A-C, blue) indicates the presence of intact nucleated cells. Bar = 10 μm.
Enumeration of CECs and clinical status of patients with PTC
| Parameters | EpCAM+-CECs (cells/ml) | TSHR+-CECs (cells/ml) | PDPN+-CECs (cells/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 (10-61)a | 19 (8-50) | 8 (3-22) | |
| Female (n = 97) | 22 (10-54) | 20 (10-44) | 8 (3-22) |
| Male (n = 32) | 32 (8-154) | 19 (4-72) | 9 (2-23) |
| Stage I (n = 75) | 17 (8-41) | 14 (5-32) | 6 (2-13) |
| Stage II (n = 15) | 16 (8-33) | 18 (12-34) | 9 (3-21) |
| Stage III (n =12) | 28 (17-91) | 25 (11-37) | 12 (7-22) |
| Stage IV (n = 27) | 58 (28-190) | 48 (10-152) | 21 (8-40) |
| Group A (n = 45) | 14 (8-22)a | 17 (10-26) | 6 (3-11) |
| Group B (n = 15) | 27 (5-43) | 7 (3-29) | 3 (2-20) |
| Group C (n = 37) | 21 (10-57) | 12 (5-26) | 6 (3-15) |
| Group D (n = 32) | 124 (54-210) | 105 (30-235) | 34 (18-71) |
| Anti-TgAb+ (n = 18) | 21 (12-50) | 9 (4-32) | 6 (4-13) |
| Anti-TgAb- (n = 34) | 21 (7-54) | 12 (4-28) | 5 (2-18) |
aThe number represents the median (interquartile range of 25% and 75%).
Figure 2Scatter dot plots and ROC analyses for EpCAM+-CECs, TSHR+-CECs, and PDPN+-CECs counts in different response to therapy groups for patients with PTC
(A, C-D) The scatter dot plots for the number of EpCAM+-CECs (panel A), TSHR+-CECs (panel C), PDPN+-CECs (panel D) in different response to therapy groups (A, B, C and D). The percentage of patients with the number of EpCAM+-CECs ≧50 cells/mL was shown in panel A. Kruskal-Wallis test with the post-hoc Dunn's test were used for statistical analyses. The median and the interquartile range for each group are indicated by the horizontal lines. (B) ROC analysis for the number of EpCAM+-CECs between group A and group D.
Figure 3Illustration for the clinical value of CECs counts in the management of a patient with PTC
A 63 year-old female PTC patient was enrolled in the study on August 6, 2013. The patient underwent total thyroidectomy on September 11, 2000 with a TNM stage II tumor. The stimulated serum Tg level was < 1.2 ng/mL before enrollment in the study. Due to the elevated CECs count (42 cells/mL), the patient underwent neck and chest CT examination. Following CT-guided biopsy and wedge resection of right upper lung, PTC with lung metastasis was diagnosed histologically. No uptake of 131I was observed in the lung in both 100 mCi 131I therapeutic scans (2014 and 2016). Final un-stimulated Tg was 0.26 ng/mL.