Jian Teng1,2, Seyedali Hejazi1,2, Lotte Hiddingh3,4, Litia Carvalho1,2, Mark C de Gooijer1,3, Hiroaki Wakimoto5, Marco Barazas1,3, Marie Tannous6, Andrew S Chi7, David P Noske3,8, Pieter Wesseling8,9,10, Thomas Wurdinger1,2,3,8, Tracy T Batchelor1,11, Bakhos A Tannous1,2. 1. Department of Neurology, Neuro-Oncology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. NeuroDiscovery Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 6. Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Notre Dame University-Louaize, Zouk Mosbeh, Lebanon. 7. Division of Neuro-Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. 8. Neuro-oncology Research Group, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 9. Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 10. Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 11. Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and most aggressive primary malignant brain tumor. Standard-of-care treatment involves maximal surgical resection of the tumor followed by radiation and chemotherapy (temozolomide [TMZ]). The 5-year survival rate of patients with GBM is <10%, a colossal failure that has been partially attributed to intrinsic and/or acquired resistance to TMZ through O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status in the tumor. Methods: A drug screening aimed at evaluating the potential recycling and repurposing of known drugs was conducted in TMZ-resistant GBM cell lines and primary cultures of newly diagnosed GBM with different MGMT promoter methylation status, phenotypic/genotypic background and subtype, and validated with sphere formation, cell migration assays, and quantitative invasive orthotopic in vivo models. Results: We identified hydroxyurea (HU) to synergize with TMZ in GBM cells in culture and in vivo, irrespective of MGMT promoter methylation status, subtype, and/or stemness. HU acts specifically on the S-phase of the cell cycle by inhibiting the M2 unit of enzyme ribonucleotide reductase. Knockdown of this enzyme using RNA interference and other known chemical inhibitors exerted a similar effect to HU in combination with TMZ both in culture and in vivo. Conclusions: We demonstrate preclinical efficacy of repurposing hydroxyurea in combination with TMZ for adjuvant GBM therapy. This combination benefit is of direct clinical interest given the extensive use of TMZ and the associated problems with TMZ-related resistance and treatment failure.
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and most aggressive primary malignant brain tumor. Standard-of-care treatment involves maximal surgical resection of the tumor followed by radiation and chemotherapy (temozolomide [TMZ]). The 5-year survival rate of patients with GBM is <10%, a colossal failure that has been partially attributed to intrinsic and/or acquired resistance to TMZ through O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status in the tumor. Methods: A drug screening aimed at evaluating the potential recycling and repurposing of known drugs was conducted in TMZ-resistant GBM cell lines and primary cultures of newly diagnosed GBM with different MGMT promoter methylation status, phenotypic/genotypic background and subtype, and validated with sphere formation, cell migration assays, and quantitative invasive orthotopic in vivo models. Results: We identified hydroxyurea (HU) to synergize with TMZ in GBM cells in culture and in vivo, irrespective of MGMT promoter methylation status, subtype, and/or stemness. HU acts specifically on the S-phase of the cell cycle by inhibiting the M2 unit of enzyme ribonucleotide reductase. Knockdown of this enzyme using RNA interference and other known chemical inhibitors exerted a similar effect to HU in combination with TMZ both in culture and in vivo. Conclusions: We demonstrate preclinical efficacy of repurposing hydroxyurea in combination with TMZ for adjuvant GBM therapy. This combination benefit is of direct clinical interest given the extensive use of TMZ and the associated problems with TMZ-related resistance and treatment failure.
Authors: A P Kyritsis; W K Yung; K A Jaeckle; J Bruner; M J Gleason; S E Ictech; A Flowers; V A Levin Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Hiroaki Wakimoto; Gayatry Mohapatra; Ryuichi Kanai; William T Curry; Stephen Yip; Mai Nitta; Anoop P Patel; Zachary R Barnard; Anat O Stemmer-Rachamimov; David N Louis; Robert L Martuza; Samuel D Rabkin Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-11-07 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Stephen Yip; Jiangyong Miao; Daniel P Cahill; A John Iafrate; Ken Aldape; Catherine L Nutt; David N Louis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-07-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Dali Yin; Xiao Wang; Bindu M Konda; John M Ong; Jinwei Hu; Manuel R Sacapano; Minhee K Ko; Andres J Espinoza; Dwain K Irvin; Yan Shu; Keith L Black Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Yuanliang Yan; Zhijie Xu; Xi Chen; Xiang Wang; Shuangshuang Zeng; Zijin Zhao; Long Qian; Zhi Li; Jie Wei; Lei Huo; Xuejun Li; Zhicheng Gong; Lunquan Sun Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol Date: 2019-10-02
Authors: Cyrillo G Brahm; U Kulsoom Abdul; Megan Houweling; Myra E van Linde; Tonny Lagerweij; Henk M W Verheul; Bart A Westerman; Annemiek M E Walenkamp; Rudolf S N Fehrmann Journal: Neurooncol Adv Date: 2020-11-05