PURPOSE: Over the past few years, the alkylating agent temozolomide has become the standard-of-care therapy for patients with glioblastoma, the most common brain tumor. Recently, large-scale cancer genome sequencing efforts have identified a hypermutation phenotype and inactivating MSH6 mismatch repair gene mutations in recurrent, post-temozolomide glioblastomas, particularly those growing more rapidly during temozolomide treatment. This study aimed to clarify the timing and role of MSH6 mutations in mediating glioblastoma temozolomide resistance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: MSH6 sequence and microsatellite instability (MSI) status were determined in matched prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy glioblastomas identified by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) as having posttreatment MSH6 mutations. Temozolomide-resistant lines were derived in vitro through selective growth under temozolomide, and the MSH6 gene was sequenced in resistant clones. The role of MSH6 inactivation in mediating resistance was explored using lentiviral short hairpin RNA knockdown and MSH6 reconstitution. RESULTS: MSH6 mutations were confirmed in posttreatment TCGA glioblastomas but absent in matched pretreatment tumors. The posttreatment hypermutation phenotype displayed a signature bias toward CpC transitions and was not associated with MSI. In vitro modeling through exposure of an MSH6 wild-type glioblastoma line to temozolomide resulted in resistant clones; one clone showed an MSH6 mutation, Thr(1219)Ile, that had been independently noted in two treated TCGA glioblastomas. Knockdown of MSH6 in the glioblastoma line U251 increased resistance to temozolomide cytotoxicity and reconstitution restored cytotoxicity in MSH6-null glioma cells. CONCLUSIONS: MSH6 mutations are selected in glioblastomas during temozolomide therapy both in vitro and in vivo and are causally associated with temozolomide resistance.
PURPOSE: Over the past few years, the alkylating agent temozolomide has become the standard-of-care therapy for patients with glioblastoma, the most common brain tumor. Recently, large-scale cancer genome sequencing efforts have identified a hypermutation phenotype and inactivating MSH6 mismatch repair gene mutations in recurrent, post-temozolomideglioblastomas, particularly those growing more rapidly during temozolomide treatment. This study aimed to clarify the timing and role of MSH6 mutations in mediating glioblastomatemozolomide resistance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:MSH6 sequence and microsatellite instability (MSI) status were determined in matched prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy glioblastomas identified by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) as having posttreatment MSH6 mutations. Temozolomide-resistant lines were derived in vitro through selective growth under temozolomide, and the MSH6 gene was sequenced in resistant clones. The role of MSH6 inactivation in mediating resistance was explored using lentiviral short hairpin RNA knockdown and MSH6 reconstitution. RESULTS:MSH6 mutations were confirmed in posttreatment TCGA glioblastomas but absent in matched pretreatment tumors. The posttreatment hypermutation phenotype displayed a signature bias toward CpC transitions and was not associated with MSI. In vitro modeling through exposure of an MSH6 wild-type glioblastoma line to temozolomide resulted in resistant clones; one clone showed an MSH6 mutation, Thr(1219)Ile, that had been independently noted in two treated TCGA glioblastomas. Knockdown of MSH6 in the glioblastoma line U251 increased resistance to temozolomidecytotoxicity and reconstitution restored cytotoxicity in MSH6-null glioma cells. CONCLUSIONS:MSH6 mutations are selected in glioblastomas during temozolomide therapy both in vitro and in vivo and are causally associated with temozolomide resistance.
Authors: M Esteller; J Garcia-Foncillas; E Andion; S N Goodman; O F Hidalgo; V Vanaclocha; S B Baylin; J G Herman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-11-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Loukola; K Eklin; P Laiho; R Salovaara; P Kristo; H Järvinen; J P Mecklin; V Launonen; L A Aaltonen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Maran J W Berends; Ying Wu; Rolf H Sijmons; Rob G J Mensink; Tineke van der Sluis; Jannet M Hordijk-Hos; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Harry Hollema; Arend Karrenbeld; Charles H C M Buys; Ate G J van der Zee; Robert M W Hofstra; Jan H Kleibeuker Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Guohze Yang; Stefan J Scherer; Scarlet S Shell; Kan Yang; Mimi Kim; Martin Lipkin; Raju Kucherlapati; Richard D Kolodner; Winfried Edelmann Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Alberto Broniscer; Justin N Baker; Suzanne J Baker; Susan N Chi; J Russell Geyer; E Brannon Morris; Amar Gajjar Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ian F Pollack; Ronald L Hamilton; Robert W Sobol; Marina N Nikiforova; Yuri E Nikiforov; Maureen A Lyons-Weiler; William A LaFramboise; Peter C Burger; Daniel J Brat; Marc K Rosenblum; Floyd H Gilles; Allan J Yates; Tianni Zhou; Kenneth J Cohen; Jonathan L Finlay; Regina I Jakacki Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Hinke F van Thuijl; Tali Mazor; Brett E Johnson; Shaun D Fouse; Koki Aihara; Chibo Hong; Annika Malmström; Martin Hallbeck; Jan J Heimans; Jenneke J Kloezeman; Marie Stenmark-Askmalm; Martine L M Lamfers; Nobuhito Saito; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Akitake Mukasa; Mitchell S Berger; Peter Söderkvist; Barry S Taylor; Annette M Molinaro; Pieter Wesseling; Jaap C Reijneveld; Susan M Chang; Bauke Ylstra; Joseph F Costello Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2015-02-28 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Joseph H McAbee; Barbara H Rath; Kristin Valdez; Dejauwne L Young; Xiaolin Wu; Uma T Shankavaram; Kevin Camphausen; Philip J Tofilon Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2019-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: David Svilar; Madhu Dyavaiah; Ashley R Brown; Jiang-bo Tang; Jianfeng Li; Peter R McDonald; Tong Ying Shun; Andrea Braganza; Xiao-hong Wang; Salony Maniar; Claudette M St Croix; John S Lazo; Ian F Pollack; Thomas J Begley; Robert W Sobol Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Rimas V Lukas; Jordi Rodon; Kevin Becker; Eric T Wong; Kent Shih; Mehdi Touat; Marcella Fassò; Stuart Osborne; Luciana Molinero; Carol O'Hear; William Grossman; Joachim Baehring Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Chul-Kee Park; Ja Eun Kim; Ji Young Kim; Sang Woo Song; Jin Wook Kim; Seung Hong Choi; Tae Min Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Il Han Kim; Sung-Hye Park Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 4.243