Literature DB >> 29099664

Acquisition of Social Support and Linguistic Characteristics of Social Media Posts About Young Adult Cancer.

Echo L Warner1,2, Lee Ellington1,2, Anne C Kirchhoff1,3, Kristin G Cloyes2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Social media (SM) is a burgeoning source of social support for young adults (YAs). We explored the language used to communicate about YA cancer on Instagram and for indicators of social support (i.e., number of likes and comments).
METHODS: Instagram posts using #youngadultcancer were randomly selected (N = 50). Text and hashtags were collected, and posts were coded for gender (female and male), treatment status (active treatment and survivorship), type of user (individual and organization), and caregiver status (yes and no). Indicators of social support, valence (e.g., positive vs. negative terms), and lexical content (e.g., emotional terms and pronouns) were measured using Yoshikoder and Linguistic Inquiry Word Count and compared by gender, treatment status, type of user, and caregiver status.
RESULTS: Survivors' posts had more likes compared to those in active treatment (mean: 54.5 vs. 32.3, p = 0.03). Individuals' posts had more comments than those of organizations (mean: 5.3 vs. 1.2, p = 0.01). More positive (30%) than negative (13%) terms were used by survivors (p < 0.01) and those in active treatment (20% vs. 9%, p = 0.04). Individuals' used more positive than negative language (p < 0.01), whereas organizations used equally positive and negative terms. Survivors used more emotional terms (79.6% vs. 34.9%, p < 0.01) and fewer pronouns (mean: 39.5 vs. 71.7, p = 0.01) than those in active treatment. Organizations (71.0%) used more emotional terms than individuals (55.9%, p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: We describe how Instagram users communicate about YA cancer and whether the language they use garners social support. Studying online language use may help YA patients, caregivers, and organizations use SM to gain social support.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Instagram; content analysis; social media; social support; supportive needs

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29099664      PMCID: PMC5899277          DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol        ISSN: 2156-5333            Impact factor:   2.223


  29 in total

1.  Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.

Authors:  J J Arnett
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2000-05

Review 2.  Social and emotional support and its implication for health.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Bert N Uchino
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.741

3.  Optimism, social support, and mental health outcomes in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Allison J Applebaum; Emma M Stein; Jennifer Lord-Bessen; Hayley Pessin; Barry Rosenfeld; William Breitbart
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Gender, cancer experience and internet use: a comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups.

Authors:  Clive Seale; Sue Ziebland; Jonathan Charteris-Black
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Family caregiving in heart failure.

Authors:  Tamilyn Bakas; Susan J Pressler; Elizabeth A Johnson; Julie A Nauser; Terrence Shaneyfelt
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Social support buffers the impact of functional impairments on caregiver psychological well-being in the context of brain tumor and other cancers.

Authors:  Tamara Ownsworth; Laura Henderson; Suzanne K Chambers
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 7.  Social well-being among adolescents and young adults with cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Echo L Warner; Erin E Kent; Kelly M Trevino; Helen M Parsons; Bradley J Zebrack; Anne C Kirchhoff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Being positive despite illness: The contribution of positivity to the quality of life of cancer patients.

Authors:  Gian Vittorio Caprara; Valeria Castellani; Guido Alessandri; Federica Mazzuca; Marco La Torre; Claudio Barbaranelli; Francesca Colaiaco; Maria Gerbino; Vittorio Pasquali; Raffaele D'Amelio; Paolo Marchetti; Vincenzo Ziparo
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2015-12-10

9.  Eliciting and receiving online support: using computer-aided content analysis to examine the dynamics of online social support.

Authors:  Yi-Chia Wang; Robert E Kraut; John M Levine
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Social Media Use and Access to Digital Technology in US Young Adults in 2016.

Authors:  Andrea C Villanti; Amanda L Johnson; Vinu Ilakkuvan; Megan A Jacobs; Amanda L Graham; Jessica M Rath
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Public Health Implications of Image-Based Social Media: A Systematic Review of Instagram, Pinterest, Tumblr, and Flickr.

Authors:  Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Elizabeth B Blankenship; Jennifer O Ahweyevu; Lacey K Cooper; Carmen H Duke; Stacy L Carswell; Ashley M Jackson; Jimmy C Jenkins; Emily A Duncan; Hai Liang; King-Wa Fu; Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019-12-06

2.  Social support enactments on social media during the first 6 months of young adult cancer caregiving.

Authors:  Echo L Warner; Anne C Kirchhoff; Andrew Wilson; Kristin G Cloyes; Ye Sun; Austin R Waters; Taylor Nelson; Lee Ellington
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Covid-19 and beyond: Broadening horizons about social media use in oncology. A survey study with healthcare professionals caring for youth with cancer.

Authors:  Michael Rost; Vittoria Espeli; Marc Ansari; Nicolas von der Weid; Bernice S Elger; Eva De Clercq
Journal:  Health Policy Technol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.211

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.