Literature DB >> 29099622

Electroencephalographic assessment of concussive non-penetrative captive bolt stunning of turkeys.

T J Gibson1, C B Rebelo1, T A Gowers1, N M Chancellor1.   

Abstract

1. The aim of this study was to evaluate the electroencephalographic (EEG) and behavioural responses of turkeys stunned with three different concussive non-penetrative captive-bolt guns prior to slaughter. 2. A total of 31 slaughter weight ex-breeding female turkeys (29 weeks of age; mean body weight 13.32 ± SD 0.65 kg) were stunned with the Cash Poultry Killer (CPK) (n = 10), Turkey Euthanasia Device (TED) (n = 10) and Zephyr EXL (n = 11). 3. Mean peak kinetic energy was highest for the CPK compared to the TED and Zephyr EXL (75.9 ± 4.5, 28.4 ± 0.4 and 24.4 ± 0.7 J, respectively). 4. A total of 29 (94%) of the turkeys were rendered unconscious following captive bolt stunning, with total power of the EEG (Ptot) significantly reduced from baseline values (reductions of 67% CPK, 84% TED and 76% Zephyr EXL, p < 0.01) and waveforms becoming isoelectric after periods of transitional EEG. However, two birds shot with the CPK and Zephyr EXL had periods of behavioural/reflexes (rhythmic respiration, nictitating membrane reflex, neck tension) and EEG activity (43-47 and 36-60 + s after the shot, respectively) indicating incomplete concussion and return of consciousness. In one bird, the shot was incorrectly positioned (Zephyr EXL), while the other appeared to be related to a defective cartridge (CPK). 5. In conclusion, all three captive bolt gun models were effective in producing unconsciousness in turkeys, provided they were positioned correctly and power loads performed according to their specifications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal welfare; behaviour/brainstem reflexes; captive bolt; electroencephalogram (EEG); non-penetrative; stunning; turkey

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29099622     DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2017.1401215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of physical euthanasia for neonatal piglets on-farm.

Authors:  Filipe Antonio Dalla Costa; Troy J Gibson; Steffan Edward Octávio Oliveira; Neville George Gregory; Arlei Coldebella; Luigi Faucitano; Charli Beatriz Ludtke; Liziè Peréirã Buss; Osmar Antonio Dalla Costa
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Electroencephalographic, physiologic and behavioural responses during cervical dislocation euthanasia in turkeys.

Authors:  Elein Hernandez; Fiona James; Stephanie Torrey; Tina Widowski; Karen Schwean-Lardner; Gabrielle Monteith; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Animal welfare assessment of on-farm euthanasia methods for individual, heavy turkeys.

Authors:  Leonie Jacobs; Dianna V Bourassa; Ranjit S Boyal; Caitlin E Harris; L Nicole Bartenfeld Josselson; Andrew Campbell; Gracie Anderson; R Jeff Buhr
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Comparing various euthanasia devices and methods on 8 and 12-week-old turkey hens.

Authors:  Austin M Stiewert; Brian Wooming; Gregory S Archer
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Head-Only Stunning of Turkeys Part 2: Subjective and Objective Assessment of the Application of AC and DC Waveforms.

Authors:  Steve Wotton; Andrew Grist; Mike O'Callaghan; Ed van Klink
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Welfare Risks of Repeated Application of On-Farm Killing Methods for Poultry.

Authors:  Jessica E Martin; Dale A Sandercock; Victoria Sandilands; Julian Sparrey; Laurence Baker; Nick H C Sparks; Dorothy E F McKeegan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Evaluation of Two Models of Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Devices for On-Farm Euthanasia of Turkeys.

Authors:  Caitlin R Woolcott; Stephanie Torrey; Patricia V Turner; Lilia Serpa; Karen Schwean-Lardner; Tina M Widowski
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Pathophysiology of Concussive Non-Penetrative Captive Bolt Stunning of Turkeys.

Authors:  Troy J Gibson; Emma King; Jade Spence; Georgina Limon
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Time to Loss of Behavioral and Brainstem Responses of Ducks following Non-Stunned Slaughter.

Authors:  Alexandra Friedman; Filipe Antonio Dalla Costa; Osmar Antonio Dalla Costa; Alicia Godsell-Ryan; Troy John Gibson
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.