| Literature DB >> 29099040 |
Olatunji Ayodeji Abulude1, Ismai'la Ahmed2, Farouk Umar Sadisu3.
Abstract
Worldwide, hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection continues to be a major public health issue. The study was aimed at assessing HBV infection as a predictor of hepatic enzymes and compounds alteration among antenatal patients in Kano State, Nigeria. Sera were screened for HBV markers using immunochromatograhy and ELISA. Serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), asphatate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin and bilirubin were also determined. Out of the 160 patients, 6.9% and 31.3% tested positive for HBsAg and HBcAb, respectively. None tested positive for HBeAg. These markers also appeared in other combinations. Of the HBsAg seropositives, 72.7% showed abnormal levels of both AST and ALP, 36.7% showed abnormal levels of both total and direct bilirubin, 9.1% showed abnormal levels of albumin, and none showed abnormal levels of ALT. HBsAg seropositivity shows significant association with ALP elevation (p = 0.02).The study revealed that few subjects (1.3%) that tested positive for HBsAg and HBeAb with normal ALT were in the inactive carrier phase of chronic hepatitisand6.9% that were seronegatives for all HBV markers equally had altered hepatic enzymes. The presence of HBeAg in the serum during HBV infection seems to cause a marked elevation of ALT level, while the reverse happens if HBeAg is absent. HBV infection can alter levels of hepatic enzymes and compounds and thus serve as one of its predictors, however; pregnancy can also lead to some of these alterations, which makes it difficult to establish the origin of these alterations among antenatal patients.Entities:
Keywords: antenatal patients; hepatic enzymes; hepatitis B virus; liver function tests; predictor; prevalence
Year: 2017 PMID: 29099040 PMCID: PMC5753653 DOI: 10.3390/medsci5040024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3271
Distribution of different combinations of hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers in relation to liver enzymes and compounds alteration among the study group (n = 160).
| Serological Markers | Frq (%) | URLAST (%) | URLALT (%) | URLALP (%) | URLTB (%) | URLDB (%) | LRLAlbumin (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBsAg (+) only | 8(5) | 6 (75.0) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (87.5) | 3 (37.5) | 3 (37.5) | 1 (12.5) |
| HBcAb (+) only | 50(31.3) | 11 (22.0) | 2 (4.0) | 14 (28.0) | 3 (6.0) | 3 (6.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| HBsAg (+) and HBeAb (+) | 2(1.3) | 1 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (100.0) | 1(50.0) | 1 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) |
| HBeAb (+) and HBcAb (+) | 71(44.4) | 16 (22.5) | 0 (0.0) | 14 (19.7) | 4 (5.6) | 4 (5.6) | 1 (1.4) |
| HBsAg (+), HBeAb (+) and HBcAb (+) | 1(0.6) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | 1 (100.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| HBsAb (+), HBeAb (+) andHBcAb (+) | 10(6.3) | 2 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (20.0) | 1 (10.0) | 1 (10.0) | 1 (10.0) |
| Seronegative | 11(6.9) | 3 (27.3) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (27.3) | 7 (63.6) | 7 (63.6) | 2 (18.2) |
| SamplesHBsAg (+) Overall | 11(6.9) | 8 (72.7) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (72.7) | 4 (36.7) | 4 (36.7) | 1(9.1) |
(+): seropositivity; URL: upper reference limit; LRL: lower reference limit; Frq: frequency.
Alcohol consumption among the study group (n = 160).
| Alcohol Consumption | Count | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| + | 0 | 0.0 |
| - | 160 | 100.0 |
(+): those that consume alcohol.; (-): those that do not consume alcohol.
HBV vaccination status of the study group (n = 160).
| Vaccination Status | Count | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| + | 2 | 1.3 |
| - | 158 | 98.8 |
(+): those that have been vaccinated with HBV vaccine; (-): those that have not been vaccinated with HBV vaccine.
Figure 1Distribution of liver enzymes and compounds among the pregnant women attending the antenatal clinics in the study area. AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; ALB: albumin; TB: total bilirubin; DB: direct bilirubin.
Predictors of liver enzymes and compounds abnormalities in relation to HBV infection among the pregnant women attending clinics in the study area.
| Marker | B | SE | Wald | df | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HbsAg | 1.62 | 0.87 | 3.43 | 1 | 0.06 |
| HbeAb | 0.08 | 0.40 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.84 |
| HbcAb | −0.86 | 0.49 | 3.02 | 1 | 0.82 |
| HbsAg | −20.09 | 28,420.67 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.99 |
| HbeAb | −21.31 | 28,419.89 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.99 |
| HbcAb | 20.49 | 28,420.53 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.99 |
| HbsAg | 2.69 | 1.12 | 5.75 | 1 | 0.02 * |
| HbeAb | −0.35 | 0.41 | 0.74 | 1 | 0.38 |
| HbcAb | −0.69 | 0.50 | 1.88 | 1 | 0.17 |
| HbsAg | 0.94 | 0.81 | 1.34 | 1 | 0.24 |
| HbeAb | −0.62 | 0.58 | 1.13 | 1 | 0.28 |
| HbcAb | −0.76 | 0.63 | 1.43 | 1 | 0.23 |
| HbsAg | 2.47 | 1.31 | 3.51 | 1 | 0.06 |
| HbeAb | 0.35 | 0.96 | 0.13 | 1 | 0.71 |
| HbcAb | −1.97 | 1.00 | 3.88 | 1 | 0.04 * |
p-Value significant at ≤0.05 and represented with *; p-value insignificant at ≥0.05; confidence interval (CI) at 95%. Negelkerke R2 for HBsAg, HBeAb, and HBcAb are 43.7%, 4.8%, and 16.7%, respectively. Classification cases for HBsAg, HBeAb, and HBcAb are 94.4%, 55.6%, and 82.5%, respectively. B: regression co-efficient; df: degree of freedom; SE: standard error; wald: ratio of the square of the B to SE.