Literature DB >> 29098982

What tests and measures should be added to the SCAT3 and related tests to improve their reliability, sensitivity and/or specificity in sideline concussion diagnosis? A systematic review.

Ruben J Echemendia1,2, Steven P Broglio3, Gavin A Davis4, Kevin M Guskiewicz5, K Alix Hayden6, John J Leddy7, William P Meehan8,9, Margot Putukian10, S John Sullivan11, Kathryn J Schneider12, Paul McCrory13.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Several iterations of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) have been published over the past 16 years. Our goal was to systematically review the literature related to the SCAT and provide recommendations for improving the tool. To achieve this goal, five separate but related searches were conducted and presented herein.
DESIGN: Systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SPORTDiscus and PubMed. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Original, empirical, peer-reviewed findings published in English and included sports-related concussion (SRC). Review papers, case studies, editorials and conference proceedings/abstracts were excluded. The age range for the ChildSCAT was 5-12 years and for the Adult SCAT was 13 years and above.
RESULTS: Out of 2961 articles screened, a total of 96 articles were included across the five searches. Searches were not mutually exclusive. The final number of articles included in the qualitative synthesis for each search was 21 on Adult SCAT, 32 on ChildSCAT, 21 on sideline, 8 on video/observation and 14 on oculomotor. SUMMARY/
CONCLUSIONS: The SCAT is the most widely accepted and deployable sport concussion assessment and screening tool currently available. There is some degree of support for using the SCAT2/SCAT3 and ChildSCAT3 in the evaluation of SRC, with and without baseline data. The addition of an oculomotor examination seems indicated, although the most valid method for assessing oculomotor function is not clear. Video-observable signs of concussion show promise, but there is insufficient evidence to warrant widespread use at this time. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; head trauma; preseason baseline testing; signs and symptoms; sports; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29098982     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  26 in total

1.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Computer-Based Neurocognitive Tests in Sport-Related Concussion: Findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium.

Authors:  Lauren L Czerniak; Spencer W Liebel; Gian-Gabriel P Garcia; Mariel S Lavieri; Michael A McCrea; Thomas W McAllister; Steven P Broglio
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Brain function associated with reaction time after sport-related concussion.

Authors:  Nathan W Churchill; Michael G Hutchison; Simon J Graham; Tom A Schweizer
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.978

3.  Mapping brain recovery after concussion: From acute injury to 1 year after medical clearance.

Authors:  Nathan W Churchill; Michael G Hutchison; Simon J Graham; Tom A Schweizer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Acute and Chronic Effects of Multiple Concussions on Midline Brain Structures.

Authors:  Nathan W Churchill; Michael G Hutchison; Simon J Graham; Tom A Schweizer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 11.800

Review 5.  The Molecular Pathophysiology of Concussion.

Authors:  David R Howell; Julia Southard
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.186

6.  Connectomic markers of symptom severity in sport-related concussion: Whole-brain analysis of resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Nathan W Churchill; Michael G Hutchison; Simon J Graham; Tom A Schweizer
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Implementation of the 2017 Berlin Concussion in Sport Group Consensus Statement in contact and collision sports: a joint position statement from 11 national and international sports organisations.

Authors:  Jon S Patricios; Clare L Ardern; Michael David Hislop; Mark Aubry; Paul Bloomfield; Carolyn Broderick; Patrick Clifton; Ruben J Echemendia; Richard G Ellenbogen; Éanna Cian Falvey; Gordon Ward Fuller; Julie Grand; Dallas Hack; Peter Rex Harcourt; David Hughes; Nathan McGuirk; Willem Meeuwisse; Jeffrey Miller; John T Parsons; Simona Richiger; Allen Sills; Kevin B Moran; Jenny Shute; Martin Raftery
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Insular Connectivity Is Associated With Self-Appraisal of Cognitive Function After a Concussion.

Authors:  Nathan W Churchill; Michael G Hutchison; Simon J Graham; Tom A Schweizer
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Concussion in field hockey: a retrospective analysis into the incidence rates, mechanisms, symptoms and recovery of concussive injuries sustained by elite field hockey players.

Authors:  Michael Rossiter; Michael Challis
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2017-09-17

10.  Performance of college athletes on the 10-item word list of SCAT5.

Authors:  Nicole Norheim; Alicia Kissinger-Knox; Megan Cheatham; Frank Webbe
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.