Literature DB >> 29098569

Imaging changes over 18 months following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: both late radiation necrosis and tumor progression can occur.

Dylann Fujimoto1, Rie von Eyben1, Iris C Gibbs1, Steven D Chang2, Gordon Li2, Griffith R Harsh2, Steven Hancock1, Nancy Fischbein3, Scott G Soltys4.   

Abstract

Following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases, the median time range to develop adverse radiation effect (ARE) or radiation necrosis is 7-11 months. Similarly, the risk of local tumor recurrence following SRS is < 5% after 18 months. With improvements in systemic therapy, patients are living longer and are at risk for both late (defined as > 18 months after SRS) tumor recurrence and late ARE, which have not previously been well described. An IRB-approved, retrospective review identified patients treated with SRS who developed new MRI contrast enhancement > 18 months following SRS. ARE was defined as stabilization/shrinkage of the lesion over time or pathologic confirmation of necrosis, without tumor. Local failure (LF) was defined as continued enlargement of the lesion over time or pathologic confirmation of tumor. We identified 16 patients, with a median follow-up of 48.2 months and median overall survival of 73.0 months, who had 19 metastases with late imaging changes occurring a median of 32.9 months (range 18.5-63.2 months) after SRS. Following SRS, 12 lesions had late ARE at a median of 33.2 months and 7 lesions had late LF occurring a median of 23.6 months. As patients with cancer live longer and as SRS is increasingly utilized for treatment of brain metastases, the incidence of these previously rare imaging changes is likely to increase. Clinicians should be aware of these late events, with ARE occurring up to 5.3 years and local failure up to 3.8 years following SRS in our cohort.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse radiation effect; Brain metastases; Radiation necrosis; Stereotactic radiosurgery; Surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29098569     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2647-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  25 in total

1.  Association Between Radiation Necrosis and Tumor Biology After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastasis.

Authors:  Jacob A Miller; Elizabeth E Bennett; Roy Xiao; Rupesh Kotecha; Samuel T Chao; Michael A Vogelbaum; Gene H Barnett; Lilyana Angelov; Erin S Murphy; Jennifer S Yu; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; John H Suh; Alireza M Mohammadi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Adverse radiation effect after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: incidence, time course, and risk factors.

Authors:  Penny K Sneed; Joe Mendez; Johanna G M Vemer-van den Hoek; Zachary A Seymour; Lijun Ma; Annette M Molinaro; Shannon E Fogh; Jean L Nakamura; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET in distinguishing recurrent brain tumor from radionecrosis in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  S T Chao; J H Suh; S Raja; S Y Lee; G Barnett
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-06-20       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Accuracy of F-DOPA PET and perfusion-MRI for differentiating radionecrotic from progressive brain metastases after radiosurgery.

Authors:  Francesco Cicone; Giuseppe Minniti; Andrea Romano; Annalisa Papa; Claudia Scaringi; Francesca Tavanti; Alessandro Bozzao; Riccardo Maurizi Enrici; Francesco Scopinaro
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Pathological response of cavernous malformations following radiosurgery.

Authors:  Samuel S Shin; Geoffrey Murdoch; Ronald L Hamilton; Amir H Faraji; Hideyuki Kano; Nathan T Zwagerman; Paul A Gardner; L Dade Lunsford; Robert M Friedlander
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish the recurrence of metastatic brain tumors from radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Koichi Mitsuya; Yoko Nakasu; Satoshi Horiguchi; Hideyuki Harada; Tetsuo Nishimura; Etsuro Bando; Hiroto Okawa; Yoshihiro Furukawa; Tatsuo Hirai; Masahiro Endo
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Single-Fraction Versus Multifraction (3 × 9 Gy) Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Large (>2 cm) Brain Metastases: A Comparative Analysis of Local Control and Risk of Radiation-Induced Brain Necrosis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Minniti; Claudia Scaringi; Sergio Paolini; Gaetano Lanzetta; Andrea Romano; Francesco Cicone; Mattia Osti; Riccardo Maurizi Enrici; Vincenzo Esposito
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Long-term risk of radionecrosis and imaging changes after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.

Authors:  Zachary A Kohutek; Yoshiya Yamada; Timothy A Chan; Cameron W Brennan; Viviane Tabar; Philip H Gutin; T Jonathan Yang; Marc K Rosenblum; Åse Ballangrud; Robert J Young; Zhigang Zhang; Kathryn Beal
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Impact of systemic targeted agents on the clinical outcomes of patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  Adam G Johnson; Jimmy Ruiz; Ryan Hughes; Brandi R Page; Scott Isom; John T Lucas; Emory R McTyre; Kristin W Houseknecht; Diandra N Ayala-Peacock; Daniel J Bourland; William H Hinson; Adrian W Laxton; Stephen B Tatter; Waldemar Debinski; Kounosuke Watabe; Michael D Chan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-08-07

10.  Pathological Evaluation of Radiation-Induced Vascular Lesions of the Brain: Distinct from De Novo Cavernous Hemangioma.

Authors:  Yoon Jin Cha; Ji Hae Nahm; Ji Eun Ko; Hyun Joo Shin; Jong-Hee Chang; Nam Hoon Cho; Se Hoon Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  10 in total

1.  Outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery for small to medium-sized brain metastases are exceptionally dependent upon tumor size and prescribed dose.

Authors:  Fabio Y Moraes; Jeff Winter; Eshetu G Atenafu; Archya Dasgupta; Hamid Raziee; Catherine Coolens; Barbara-Ann Millar; Normand Laperriere; Maitry Patel; Mark Bernstein; Paul Kongkham; Gelareh Zadeh; Tatiana Conrad; Caroline Chung; Alejandro Berlin; David B Shultz
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Current emerging MRI tools for radionecrosis and pseudoprogression diagnosis.

Authors:  Lucia Nichelli; Stefano Casagranda
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.915

3.  Clinical Experience of Cerebrospinal Fluid-Based Liquid Biopsy Demonstrates Superiority of Cell-Free DNA over Cell Pellet Genomic DNA for Molecular Profiling.

Authors:  Tejus A Bale; Soo-Ryum Yang; James P Solomon; Khedoudja Nafa; Sumit Middha; Jacklyn Casanova; Justyna Sadowska; Anna Skakodub; Hamza Ahmad; Helena A Yu; Greg J Riely; Mark G Kris; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Marc K Rosenblum; Igor Gavrilovic; Matthias A Karajannis; Elena Pentsova; Alexandra Miller; Adrienne Boire; Ingo Mellinghoff; Michael F Berger; Ahmet Zehir; Marc Ladanyi; Ryma Benayed; Maria E Arcila
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 5.341

4.  Combined FET PET/MRI radiomics differentiates radiation injury from recurrent brain metastasis.

Authors:  Philipp Lohmann; Martin Kocher; Garry Ceccon; Elena K Bauer; Gabriele Stoffels; Shivakumar Viswanathan; Maximilian I Ruge; Bernd Neumaier; Nadim J Shah; Gereon R Fink; Karl-Josef Langen; Norbert Galldiks
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  Pseudoprogression of brain tumors.

Authors:  Stefanie C Thust; Martin J van den Bent; Marion Smits
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Brain Radiation Necrosis: Current Management With a Focus on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Gokoulakrichenane Loganadane; Frédéric Dhermain; Guillaume Louvel; Paul Kauv; Eric Deutsch; Cécile Le Péchoux; Antonin Levy
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  MRI-based contrast clearance analysis shows high differentiation accuracy between radiation-induced reactions and progressive disease after cranial radiotherapy.

Authors:  R Bodensohn; R Forbrig; S Quach; J Reis; A-L Boulesteix; U Mansmann; I Hadi; D F Fleischmann; J Mücke; A Holzgreve; N L Albert; V Ruf; M Dorostkar; S Corradini; J Herms; C Belka; N Thon; M Niyazi
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2022-03-03

8.  Predictors of radiation necrosis in long-term survivors after Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.

Authors:  Zaid A Siddiqui; Bryan S Squires; Matt D Johnson; Andrew M Baschnagel; Peter Y Chen; Daniel J Krauss; Ricky E Olson; Kurt D Meyer; Inga S Grills
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2019-12-06

9.  Effect of setup error in the single-isocenter technique on stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases.

Authors:  Hisashi Nakano; Satoshi Tanabe; Satoru Utsunomiya; Takumi Yamada; Ryuta Sasamoto; Toshimichi Nakano; Hirotake Saito; Takeshi Takizawa; Hironori Sakai; Atsushi Ohta; Eisuke Abe; Motoki Kaidu; Hidefumi Aoyama
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 10.  Intracranial Metastatic Disease: Present Challenges, Future Opportunities.

Authors:  Alyssa Y Li; Karolina Gaebe; Katarzyna J Jerzak; Parneet K Cheema; Arjun Sahgal; Sunit Das
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.