Literature DB >> 25978710

Adverse radiation effect after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: incidence, time course, and risk factors.

Penny K Sneed1, Joe Mendez2, Johanna G M Vemer-van den Hoek3, Zachary A Seymour1, Lijun Ma1, Annette M Molinaro4, Shannon E Fogh1, Jean L Nakamura1, Michael W McDermott1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors sought to determine the incidence, time course, and risk factors for overall adverse radiation effect (ARE) and symptomatic ARE after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases.
METHODS: All cases of brain metastases treated from 1998 through 2009 with Gamma Knife SRS at UCSF were considered. Cases with less than 3 months of follow-up imaging, a gap of more than 8 months in imaging during the 1st year, or inadequate imaging availability were excluded. Brain scans and pathology reports were reviewed to ensure consistent scoring of dates of ARE, treatment failure, or both; in case of uncertainty, the cause of lesion worsening was scored as indeterminate. Cumulative incidence of ARE and failure were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method with censoring at last imaging. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Among 435 patients and 2200 brain metastases evaluable, the median patient survival time was 17.4 months and the median lesion imaging follow-up was 9.9 months. Calculated on the basis of 2200 evaluable lesions, the rates of treatment failure, ARE, concurrent failure and ARE, and lesion worsening with indeterminate cause were 9.2%, 5.4%, 1.4%, and 4.1%, respectively. Among 118 cases of ARE, approximately 60% were symptomatic and 85% occurred 3-18 months after SRS (median 7.2 months). For 99 ARE cases managed without surgery or bevacizumab, the probabilities of improvement observed on imaging were 40%, 57%, and 76% at 6, 12, and 18 months after onset of ARE. The most important risk factors for ARE included prior SRS to the same lesion (with 20% 1-year risk of symptomatic ARE vs 3%, 4%, and 8% for no prior treatment, prior whole brain radiotherapy [WBRT], or concurrent WBRT) and any of these volume parameters: target, prescription isodose, 12-Gy, or 10-Gy volume. Excluding lesions treated with repeat SRS, the 1-year probabilities of ARE were < 1%, 1%, 3%, 10%, and 14% for maximum diameter 0.3-0.6 cm, 0.7-1.0 cm, 1.1-1.5 cm, 1.6-2.0 cm, and 2.1-5.1 cm, respectively. The 1-year probabilities of symptomatic ARE leveled off at 13%-14% for brain metastases maximum diameter > 2.1 cm, target volume > 1.2 cm(3), prescription isodose volume > 1.8 cm(3), 12-Gy volume > 3.3 cm(3), and 10-Gy volume > 4.3 cm(3), excluding lesions treated with repeat SRS. On both univariate and multivariate analysis, capecitabine, but not other systemic therapy within 1 month of SRS, appeared to increase ARE risk. For the multivariate analysis considering only metastases with target volume > 1.0 cm(3), risk factors for ARE included prior SRS, kidney primary tumor, connective tissue disorder, and capecitabine.
CONCLUSIONS: Although incidence of ARE after SRS was low overall, risk increased rapidly with size and volume, leveling off at a 1-year cumulative incidence of 13%-14%. This study describes the time course of ARE and provides risk estimates by various lesion characteristics and treatment parameters to aid in decision-making and patient counseling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARE = adverse radiation effect; AVM = arteriovenous malformation; CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; PACS = picture archiving and communication system; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; UCSF = University of California, San Francisco; WBRT = whole-brain radiation therapy; brain metastasis; brain/radiation effects; dose-response relationship; necrosis; oncology; radiation; radiation injuries; radiosurgery/adverse effects; stereotactic radiosurgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25978710     DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS141610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  76 in total

1.  Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) vs. bevacizumab for radiation necrosis in previously irradiated brain metastases.

Authors:  Nanthiya Sujijantarat; Christopher S Hong; Kent A Owusu; Aladine A Elsamadicy; Joseph P Antonios; Andrew B Koo; Joachim M Baehring; Veronica L Chiang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  Brain metastases: neuroimaging.

Authors:  Whitney B Pope
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

3.  Radiation necrosis with stereotactic radiosurgery combined with CTLA-4 blockade and PD-1 inhibition for treatment of intracranial disease in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Penny Fang; Wen Jiang; Pamela Allen; Isabella Glitza; Nandita Guha; Patrick Hwu; Amol Ghia; Jack Phan; Anita Mahajan; Hussein Tawbi; Jing Li
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Volumetric response of progressing post-SRS lesions treated with laser interstitial thermal therapy.

Authors:  Vivek B Beechar; Sujit S Prabhu; Dhiego Bastos; Jeffrey S Weinberg; R Jason Stafford; David Fuentes; Kenneth R Hess; Ganesh Rao
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Minimizing normal tissue dose spillage via broad-range optimization of hundreds of intensity modulated beams for treating multiple brain targets.

Authors:  Peng Dong; Sabbir Hossain; Vance Keeling; Salahuddin Ahmad; Lei Xing; Lijun Ma
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2016

6.  Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases.

Authors:  Timothy J Kaufmann; Marion Smits; Jerrold Boxerman; Raymond Huang; Daniel P Barboriak; Michael Weller; Caroline Chung; Christina Tsien; Paul D Brown; Lalitha Shankar; Evanthia Galanis; Elizabeth Gerstner; Martin J van den Bent; Terry C Burns; Ian F Parney; Gavin Dunn; Priscilla K Brastianos; Nancy U Lin; Patrick Y Wen; Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Hypofractionated frameless gamma knife radiosurgery for large metastatic brain tumors.

Authors:  Yavuz Samanci; Uluman Sisman; Alara Altintas; Sebile Sarioglu; Samira Sharifi; Ali İhsan Atasoy; Yasemin Bolukbasi; Selcuk Peker
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 5.150

8.  The risk of radiation necrosis following stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent systemic therapies.

Authors:  Joseph M Kim; Jacob A Miller; Rupesh Kotecha; Roy Xiao; Aditya Juloori; Matthew C Ward; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Alireza M Mohammadi; David M Peereboom; Erin S Murphy; John H Suh; Gene H Barnett; Michael A Vogelbaum; Lilyana Angelov; Glen H Stevens; Samuel T Chao
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Found Inline with the Fields of Repeat Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Authors:  Aldo Berti; Michelle Granville; Robert E Jacobson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-01-12

10.  Salvage stereotactic radiosurgery with adjuvant use of bevacizumab for heavily treated recurrent brain metastases: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Shoji Yomo; Motohiro Hayashi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.