| Literature DB >> 29098158 |
Tao Zhong1, Xiao-Yue Duan1, Hao Zhang1, Li Li1, Hong-Ping Zhang1, Lili Niu1.
Abstract
The root of Angelica sinensis (RAS) is a traditional Chinese medicine used for preventing and treating various diseases. In this study, we assessed RAS supplementation effects on body weight and the FTO gene expression and methylation status in a high-fat-diet (HFD) induced obese mouse model. Female obese mice were divided into groups according to RAS dosage in diet as follows: normal diet, HFD diet (HC), HFD with low-dosage RAS (DL), HFD with medium-dosage RAS (DM), and HFD with high-dosage RAS (DH). After RAS supplementation for 4 weeks, body weight suppression and FTO expression in DH mice were significantly higher than in HC mice, whereas no significant change in FTO expression was detected between DM and DL mice or in their offspring. Bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP) revealed that the CpG island in the FTO promoter was hypermethylated up to 95.44% in the HC group, 91.67% in the DH group, and 90.00% in the normal diet group. Histological examination showed that adipocytes in the DH group were smaller than those in the HC group, indicating a potential role of RAS in obesity. This study indicated that RAS could ameliorate obesity induced by HFD and that the molecular mechanism might be associated with the expression of the FTO gene.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29098158 PMCID: PMC5632476 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6280972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Composition of the experimental diets used in the present study.
| Ingredients | Normal diet | High-fat-diet | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC | HC | DL | DM | DH | |
| Corn starch | 30.0% | 22.0% | 21.6% | 21.0% | 19.6% |
| Flour | 30.0% | 22.0% | 21.6% | 21.0% | 19.6% |
| Bran | 14.0% | 10.0% | 10.0% | 9.6% | 9.0% |
| Soybean meal | 20.0% | 15.0% | 14.8% | 14.4% | 13.4% |
| Fish meal | 6.0% | 6.0% | 6.0% | 5.6% | 5.0% |
| Lard | 0 | 8.0% | 7.8% | 7.6% | 7.4% |
| Egg | 0 | 10.0% | 10.0% | 9.6% | 9.0% |
| Sucrose | 0 | 7.0% | 6.8% | 6.6% | 6.2% |
|
| 0 | 0 | 1.4% | 4.6% | 10.8% |
| Total | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Information of primer pairs used in this study.
| Primer name | Primer sequence (5′-3′) | Size (bp) | Tm (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| QPCR | |||
| FTO-Q-1F | GAGTTCTATCAGCAGTGG | 163 | 55.0 |
| FTO-Q-1R | GCACATCTTTGCCTTGGA | ||
| GAPDH-1F | GGTGAAGGTCGGTGTGAACG | 233 | 55.0 |
| GAPDH-1R | CTCGCTCCTGGAAGATGGTG | ||
| ACTB-1F | CGTTGACATCCGTAAAGACC | 281 | 55.0 |
| ACTB-1R | AACAGTCCGCCTAGAAGCAC | ||
| 18S rRNA-1F | AGGGGAGAGCGGGTAAGAGA | 241 | 55.0 |
| 18S rRNA-1R | GGACAGGACTAGGCGGAAC | ||
| BPS | |||
| FTO-B1F | TAGTTGATTTTGTTTGAAGAGGAAGA | 671 | 65.2 |
| FTO-B1R | TCCTACTCACTATCAACAATTCCTAA | ||
| FTO-B2F | GGGTTGAAGAGGTGGTTTAGTAGTTA | 496 | 57.5 |
| FTO-B2R | ACAATCTCACTCAATCCACTTACATCT |
Figure 1Body weight changes in the HFD mice model (a). Effects of RAS supplementation on body weight alterations in the HFD mice (b).
Effects of RAS supplementation on body weight alterations in mice.
| Group | AS content | Sample size | 10 weeks | 11 weeks | 12 weeks | 13 weeks | 14 weeks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC | NA | 10 | 36.70 ± 3.52 | 37.62 ± 4.14 | 38.16 ± 3.90 | 38.50 ± 3.43 | 40.40 ± 4.20 |
| HC | NA | 12 | 39.71 ± 1.13 | 39.57 ± 2.62 | 41.75 ± 3.75 | 43.46 ± 4.32 | 45.60 ± 5.08 |
| DL | 2.00 g/kg·BW | 11 | 35.50 ± 1.43 | 36.74 ± 2.32 | 37.72 ± 2.22 | 39.24 ± 3.09 | 40.50 ± 2.53 |
| DM | 5.00 g/kg·BW | 11 | 41.60 ± 0.65 | 41.26 ± 2.71 | 43.34 ± 4.20 | 43.17 ± 2.92 | 43.70 ± 1.85 |
| DH | 10.00 g/kg·BW | 12 | 45.10 ± 1.80 | 46.15 ± 2.37 | 45.38 ± 3.14 | 46.14 ± 3.37 | 44.20 ± 2.27 |
The dosage of AS was according to the recommendation.
Figure 2Effects of RAS supplementation on FTO mRNA expression in HFD obese mice. Different letters above each bar represent being significantly different (P < 0.05). ∗∗ indicates significant difference (P < 0.01).
Figure 3Schematic representation of the FTO promoter and the intragenic CpG sites in a 443-bp region (a). Methylation status of the FTO promoter in adipose tissues in GC, HC, and DH mice after being RAS-treated for 35 days (b). Each line represented as a sequence from each clone, while each vertical bar corresponded to an identical CpG site.
Figure 4Histological assessment of the adipose tissues of mice in the HC and DH groups (a). Scale bars, 50 μm. The quantitative data of the mean diameter and area of adipocytes are shown (b). Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). P < 0.01.