| Literature DB >> 29098069 |
Julia Loesaus1, Isabel Wobbe1, Erik Stahlberg1, Joerg Barkhausen1, Jan Peter Goltz1.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the reliability of pronator quadratus fat pad sign to detect distal radius fracture and to predict its severity.Entities:
Keywords: Computed tomography; Conventional radiograph; Distal radius fracture; Frykman classification; Pronator quadratus complex; Pronator quadratus fat pad sign
Year: 2017 PMID: 29098069 PMCID: PMC5658631 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i9.359
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Radiol ISSN: 1949-8470
Figure 1Anatomical sketch of conventional radiograph on lateral view of wrist.
Figure 2Measurement of the pronator quadratus complex on a lateral conventional radiograph.
Figure 3Measurement of the pronator quadratus complex on a sagittal reconstructed computed tomography.
Figure 4No fracture on lateral radiographs (A), but positive fad pad sign and confirmed fracture on computed tomography study (B). A 48-year-old lady, who had a distal forearm trauma. On lateral radiographs no fracture can be detected, but detailed analysis of the CR shows a thickened pronator quadratus complex measuring 8.5 mm (positive fad pad sign without verification of a wrist fracture on CR) (A). Computed tomography however reveals a fissurale epiphysial fracture (B).
Figure 5Non-thickened pronator quadratus complex (7 mm) in spite of an obvious fracture in a 27-year-old patient following distal forearm trauma.
Distribution (n = 44) of distal radius fractures according to the Frykman classification
| Frykman-classification | |
| I | 3 |
| II | 0 |
| III | 10 |
| IV | 5 |
| V | 2 |
| VI | 2 |
| VII | 9 |
| VIII | 13 |
Thickness of the pronator quadratus complex measured on lateral conventional radiographs and sagital reconstructions of a computed tomography
| Total (n = 89) | With fracture | Without fracture | |
| ( | ( | ||
| CR (mm) | 7.5 ± 2.8 | 8.8 ± 2.9 | 6.2 ± 1.8 |
| CT (mm) | 9.4 ± 3.0 | 10.9 ± 3.1 | 7.8 ± 2.0 |
| Correlation | 0.795 | 0.74 | 0.695 |
| coefficient |
CR: Conventional radiographs; CT: Computed tomography.
Frequency of a positive and negative fat pad sign depending on the absence or presence of a fracture
| CR pronator quadratus fat pad sign | ||||
| Radius fracture | Positive | Negative | Total | |
| Yes | 21 | 23 | 44 | |
| No | 2 | 43 | 45 | |
| Total | 23 | 66 | 89 | |
Sensitivity and specificity of the positive fat pad sign for detection of a fracture
| Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive | Negative | |
| predictive value | predictive value | |||
| Positive fat pad | 48.00% | 96.00% | 91.00% | 65.00% |
| sign for detection | ||||
| of a fracture |