Literature DB >> 9651777

Evaluation of simplified Frykman and AO classifications of fractures of the distal radius. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.

A Illarramendi1, A González Della Valle, E Segal, P De Carli, G Maignon, G Gallucci.   

Abstract

In order to evaluate interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the Frykman and AO classifications and their variations between assessors with different levels of experience, three hand specialists, a fellow and two senior residents classified radiographs of 200 fractures of the distal radius in anteroposterior and lateral views. Reproducibility was assessed by the use of the proportion of agreement and kappa coefficient between pairs of observers. The Frykman classification showed moderate interobserver reproducibility (kappa = 0.43) and good intraobserver reproducibility (kappa = 0.61). The experience of the reviewers did not significantly affect either of these. The AO system showed regular interobserver reproducibility (kappa = 0.37) and moderate intraobserver reproducibility (kappa = 0.57). The younger group obtained higher intraobserver agreement than the senior. Possible causes for the low reproducibility of both classifications are discussed together with a review of the literature. We do not recommend the Frykman or AO classifications for clinical application because of their questionable reproducibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9651777      PMCID: PMC3619715          DOI: 10.1007/s002640050220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Fracture of the distal radius].

Authors:  H R Siebert; A Klonz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Anatomical and/or pathological predictors for the "incorrect" classification of red dot markers on wrist radiographs taken following trauma.

Authors:  R Kranz; P Cosson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  The use of plain radiographs in the classification of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Scott Evans; Michael David; Mohammed Kamil Quraishi; Umar-Khetaab Hanif; Hammad Sadique; Bhuvneswar Machani
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-19

4.  AO Distal Radius Fracture Classification: Global Perspective on Observer Agreement.

Authors:  Prakash Jayakumar; Teun Teunis; Beatriz Bravo Giménez; Frederik Verstreken; Livio Di Mascio; Jesse B Jupiter
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2016-08-08

5.  The Buttazzoni classification of distal radial fractures in adults: interobserver and intraobserver reliability.

Authors:  Mats A Wadsten; Arkan S Sayed-Noor; Göran O Sjödén; Olle Svensson; Gunnar G Buttazzoni
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-01-27

6.  [Incorrect classification of extra-articular distal radius fractures by conventional X-rays. Comparison between biplanar radiologic diagnostics and CT assessment of fracture morphology].

Authors:  H C Dahlen; W M Franck; G Sabauri; M Amlang; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  A classification and grading system for Barton fractures.

Authors:  Yi Lu; Shaoliang Li; Manyi Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Agreement between Initial Classification and Subsequent Reclassification of Fractures of the Distal Radius in a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Roderick H van Leerdam; J Sebastiaan Souer; Anneluuk L C Lindenhovius; David C Ring
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-07-09

9.  [LiLa classification for paediatric long bone fractures. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability].

Authors:  A Kamphaus; M Rapp; L M Wessel; M Buchholz; E Massalme; D Schneidmüller; C Roeder; M M Kaiser
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Validity of classification of distal radial fractures in the Swedish fracture register.

Authors:  Malena Bergvall; Carl Bergdahl; Carl Ekholm; David Wennergren
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.