Literature DB >> 29097795

Cochrane and the COMET initiative: developing the evidence base in oral medicine.

J Taylor1,2, T Walsh2, H Worthington2, P Brocklehurst3, M N Pemberton2,4, A M Glenny2.   

Abstract

All clinicians in medicine and dentistry aim to deliver evidence-based practice; however, it is widely recognised that the current evidence base for interventions in oral medicine, as with many other specialties, is of a low quality. The highest level of evidence is considered to be the systematic review and meta-analysis. The Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Oral Health group produce high quality systematic reviews, however, despite the large number of trials carried out for treatments in oral medicine, the results are often not able to be utilised to guide clinical care due to the various methodological limitations of the trials including the heterogeneity of outcome measures used. To improve the strength of the evidence base this will need to change. The Comet initiative aims to support the development of core outcome sets which are used to allow homogeneity of outcome measures in trials and therefore will allow pooling of data for meta-analysis in future systematic reviews. This paper explores the complexities involved in producing evidence for oral medicine interventions and introduces an approach for developing core outcome sets in oral medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29097795     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  14 in total

Review 1.  Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines.

Authors:  S H Woolf; R Grol; A Hutchinson; M Eccles; J Grimshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-20

2.  Using Cochrane reviews for oral diseases.

Authors:  H V Worthington; A-M Glenny; L Fernandez Mauleffinch; F Daly; J Clarkson
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.511

Review 3.  World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI: a systematic review of the treatment of mucous membrane pemphigoid.

Authors:  J Taylor; R McMillan; M Shephard; J Setterfield; R Ahmed; M Carrozzo; S Grando; M Mignogna; M Kuten-Shorrer; T Musbah; A Elia; R McGowan; A R Kerr; M S Greenberg; T Hodgson; D Sirois
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2015-03-11

Review 4.  Urban legends: recurrent aphthous stomatitis.

Authors:  L Baccaglini; R V Lalla; A J Bruce; J C Sartori-Valinotti; M C Latortue; M Carrozzo; R S Rogers
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.511

Review 5.  World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI: a systematic review of the treatment of mucocutaneous pemphigus vulgaris.

Authors:  R McMillan; J Taylor; M Shephard; R Ahmed; M Carrozzo; J Setterfield; S Grando; M Mignogna; M Kuten-Shorrer; T Musbah; A Elia; R McGowan; A R Kerr; M S Greenberg; T Hodgson; D Sirois
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2015-03-09

6.  Evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  D L Sackett
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.300

7.  Further reliability and responsiveness of the Chronic Oral Mucosal Diseases Questionnaire.

Authors:  R Ni Riordain; C McCreary
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.511

Review 8.  Design and statistical analysis of oral medicine studies: common pitfalls.

Authors:  L Baccaglini; J J Shuster; J Cheng; D W Theriaque; V J Schoenbach; S L Tomar; C Poole
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.511

9.  How do we create, and improve, the evidence base?

Authors:  N P T Innes; F Schwendicke; T Lamont
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 1.626

10.  Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider.

Authors:  Paula R Williamson; Douglas G Altman; Jane M Blazeby; Mike Clarke; Declan Devane; Elizabeth Gargon; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.