| Literature DB >> 29097659 |
Bo Zhou1, Chuanyi Ning1, Chase D McCann2, Yanyan Liao1, Xiaobo Yang1, Yunfeng Zou1, Junjun Jiang1, Bingyu Liang1, Abu S Abdullah1,3, Bo Qin4, Halmurat Upur5, Chaohui Zhong6, Li Ye7, Hao Liang8.
Abstract
To compare different intervention models for promoting male circumcision (MC) to prevent HIV transmission in Western China. A total of 1690 male participants from multiple study sites were cluster randomly allocated to three-stage (Model A), two-stage (Model B), and one-stage (Model C) educational interventions. In all three interventions models, knowledge about MC significantly increased and the reported willingness to accept MC increased to 52.6% (255/485), 67.0% (353/527), and 45.5% (219/481) after intervention, respectively (P < 0.05). Rate of MC surgery uptake was highest (23.7%; 115/485) among those who received Model A intervention, compared to those who received Model B (17.1%; 90/527) or Model C (9.4%; 45/481) interventions (P < 0.05). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified that Model A or Model B had twice the effect of Model C on MC uptake, with relative risks of 2.4 (95%CI, 1.5-3.8) and 2.2 (95%CI, 1.3-3.6), respectively. Model B was the most effective model for improving participants' willingness to accept MC, while Model A was most successful at increasing uptake of MC surgery. Self-reported attitude towards MC uptake was not strongly correlated with actual behavior in this study focusing on the general male population in Western China.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29097659 PMCID: PMC5668315 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13995-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1A total of 1690 subjects participated in the initial interview. Of those, 1640 completed the entire interview and were randomly allocated into one of three intervention models. Model A: Delivered all the intervention at 3 stages: distribution of general materials at the initial contact (0 month); distribution of general and special materials within 1 month after the initial contact; held an one-time on-site session that included dissemination of materials and expert- and volunteer-led discussions within 1 month after receiving all the above interventions. Model B: Delivered two intervention performances at 2 stages: distribution of general and special materials at the initial contact (0 month) and held an on-site session that included dissemination of materials and expert- and volunteer-led discussions within 1 month after the initial contact. Model C: Delivered general and special materials and held an one-time on-site session that included dissemination of materials and expert- and volunteer-led discussions at the initial contact (0 month). Changes in knowledge of MC, acceptability of MC, uptake of MC surgery, the cost per acceptance, and HIV/STD infection rate were analyzed at 9-months follow-up visits. For each model, the participants would not have the chance to enter the next intervention if they did not receive allocated intervention, which are included as “lost to follow” or “refused”. Only data generated form participants who completed the entire questionnaire at the 9th month follow-up visit were included in the final analysis.
Demographic characteristics of enrolled participants.
| Characteristic | Model A (%) | Model B (%) | Model C (%) | Total (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (N = 532) | (N = 586) | (N = 522) | (N = 1640) | ||
|
| 0.066 | ||||
| 18–25 | 289 (54.3) | 339 (57.8) | 256 (49.0) | 884 (53.9) | |
| 25–35 | 142 (26.7) | 143 (24.4) | 158 (30.3) | 443 (27.0) | |
| Over35 | 101 (19.0) | 104 (17.7) | 108 (20.7) | 313 (19.1) | |
|
| 0.008 | ||||
| Han population | 470 (88.3) | 547 (93.3) | 482 (92.3) | 1499 (91.4) | |
| Other population | 62 (11.7) | 39 (6.7) | 40 (7.7) | 141 (8.6) | |
|
| 0.120 | ||||
| Guangxi | 200 (37.6) | 208 (36.1) | 194 (40.2) | 602 (36.7) | |
| Chongqing | 195 (36.7) | 180 (31.3) | 181 (34.7) | 556 (33.9) | |
| Xinjiang | 137 (25.7) | 188 (32.6) | 147 (28.2) | 472 (28.8) | |
|
| 0.003 | ||||
| Buddhism | 52 (9.8) | 32 (5.5) | 21 (4.0) | 105 (6.4) | |
| Other religious belief | 18 (3.4) | 12 (2.0) | 9 (1.7) | 39 (2.4) | |
| No religious belief | 462 (86.8) | 542 (92.5) | 429 (94.3) | 1496 (91.2) | |
|
| 0.112 | ||||
| Junior school or below | 89 (16.7) | 92 (15.7) | 106 (20.3) | 287 (17.5) | |
| High school or above | 443 (83.3) | 494 (84.3) | 416 (79.7) | 1353 (82.5) | |
|
| 0.265 | ||||
| Never married | 313 (58.8) | 337 (57.5) | 301 (57.7) | 951 (58.0) | |
| Married or cohabitation without marriage | 215 (40.4) | 240 (41.0) | 208 (39.8) | 663 (40.4) | |
| Divorced/separated/widowed | 4 (0.8) | 9 (1.5) | 13 (2.5) | 26 (1.6) | |
|
| 0.253 | ||||
| Employed | 490 (92.1) | 551 (94.0) | 493 (94.4) | 1534 (93.5) | |
| Unemployed | 42 (7.9) | 35 (6.0) | 29 (5.6) | 106 (6.5) |
Note: Compared baseline characteristics among Model A, B and C used the chi-squared test.
Change in knowledge of MC compared between the three intervention models.
| Variables | Model A | Model B | Model C | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention (%) | After intervention (%) |
|
| Before intervention (%) | After intervention (%) |
|
| Before intervention (%) | After intervention (%) |
|
| |
| (n = 532) | (n = 485) | (n = 586) | (n = 527) | (n = 522) | (n = 481) | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Redundant foreskin | 365 (68.6) | 344 (70.9) | 0.6 | 0.422 | 408 (69.6) | 381 (72.3) | 1.0 | 0.327 | 371 (71.1) | 343 (71.3) | 0.007 | 0.934 |
| Prevention of penile cancer** | 169 (31.8) | 282 (58.1) | 71.5 | <0.001 | 246 (42.0) | 324 (61.5) | 42.2 | <0.001 | 175 (33.5) | 331 (68.8) | 124.7 | <0.001 |
| Protection against HIV and STDs | 147 (27.6) | 347 (71.5) | 195.9 | <0.001 | 180 (30.7) | 399 (75.7) | 225.1 | <0.001 | 128 (24.5) | 338 (70.3) | 210.6 | <0.001 |
| Improved female partners’ hygiene* | 239 (44.9) | 322 (66.4) | 47.3 | <0.001 | 316 (53.9) | 372 (70.6) | 32.6 | <0.001 | 247 (47.3) | 303 (63.3) | 24.8 | <0.001 |
| Enhanced sexual pleasure | 173 (32.5) | 217 (44.7) | 16.0 | <0.001 | 217 (37.0) | 233 (44.2) | 5.9 | 0.015 | 150 (28.7) | 183 (38.0) | 9.8 | 0.002 |
| Better penile appearance** | 71 (13.3) | 106 (21.9) | 12.8 | <0.001 | 59 (10.1) | 92 (17.5) | 12.9 | <0.001 | 38 (7.3) | 58 (12.1) | 6.6 | 0.010 |
| Traditional or religious reason | 3 (0.6) | 12 (2.5) | 6.4 | 0.012 | 0 | 12 (2.3) | 13.5 | <0.001 | 2 (0.4) | 6 (1.2) | 2.4 | 0.124 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Pain | 204 (38.32) | 304 (62.7) | 60.0 | <0.001 | 250 (42.7) | 361 (68.5) | 74.8 | <0.001 | 189 (36.2) | 302 (62.8) | 70.8 | <0.001 |
| Bleeding** | 121 (22.7) | 238 (49.1) | 77.0 | <0.001 | 275 (46.9) | 329 (62.4) | 26.9 | <0.001 | 143 (51.5) | 313 (65.1) | 143.3 | <0.001 |
| Infection** | 227 (42.7) | 242 (49.9) | 5.3 | 0.021 | 166 (28.3) | 289 (54.8) | 80.7 | <0.001 | 269 (27.4) | 366 (76.1) | 65.0 | <0.001 |
| Don’t know** | 126 (23.7) | 88 (18.1) | 4.7 | 0.030 | 138 (23.5) | 62 (11.8) | 28.0 | <0.001 | 112 (21.5) | 33 (6.9) | 43.1 | <0.001 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Enhanced** | 144 (27.1) | 237 (48.9) | 51.5 | <0.001 | 209 (35.7) | 218 (41.6) | 3.8 | 0.051 | 148 (28.4) | 156 (32.4) | 2.0 | 0.160 |
| Reduced** | 47 (8.8) | 18 (3.7) | 11.1 | 0.001 | 43 (7.3) | 27 (5.1) | 2.3 | 0.129 | 58 (11.1) | 43 (8.9) | 1.3 | 0.254 |
| Has no influence* | 119 (22.4) | 118 (24.3) | 0.1 | 0.783 | 113 (19.3) | 123 (23.3) | 2.7 | 0.098 | 116 (22.2) | 146 (30.4) | 8.6 | 0.003 |
| Don’t know* | 125 (23.5) | 112 (23.1) | 0.02 | 0.879 | 149 (36.0) | 159 (30.2) | 3.1 | 0.077 | 183 (35.1) | 136 (28.3) | 5.3 | 0.021 |
Note: Compare to changes in knowledge on circumcision of three models for scaling up MC after education intervention among three models. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Change in willingness to accept MC surgery after intervention.
| Variables | Willingness to accept MC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention (%) | After intervention (%) |
|
| |
| Model A | 44.7 (238/532) | 52.6 (255/485) | 6.2 | 0.012 |
| Model B | 50.9 (298/586) | 67.0 (353/527) | 31.6 | <0.001 |
| Model C | 39.3 (205/522) | 45.5 (219/481) | 26.9 | <0.001 |
|
| 15.013 | 49.141 | — | — |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | — | — |
| Total | 45.2 (741/1640) | 55.4 (827/1093) | 32.6 | <0.001 |
Change in uptake MC surgery after intervention and Cox-regression analysis.
| Variables | Uptake of MC surgery | Cox-regression of uptake of MC | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention (%) | After intervention (%) |
|
|
| 95% CI |
| |
| Model A | 0 | 23.7 (115/485) | 142.2 | <0.001 | 2.4 | 1.5–3.8 | <0.001 |
| Model B | 0 | 17.1 (90/527) | 108.9 | <0.001 | 2.2 | 1.3–3.6 | 0.002 |
| Model C | 0 | 9.4 (45/481) | 51.1 | <0.001 | 1 | — | — |
|
| — | 35.765 | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| — | 0.000 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total | 0 | 22.9 (250/1493) | 298.4 | <0.001 | — | — | — |
Note: RR*, the rate of MC acceptability that Model A and Model B compared to Model C, respectively. Cox regression model adjusting for demographic (age, ethnicity, marital status and education) and regions, estimated RR (relative risk) with 95% CI (confidence interval). Defining the baseline time as the starting point, the endpoint was either acceptance of MC surgery or, for uncircumcised participants, the end of the second follow-up session.