| Literature DB >> 22253919 |
Xiaobo Yang1, Abu S Abdullah, Bo Wei, Junjun Jiang, Wei Deng, Bo Qin, Weili Yan, Qianqiu Wang, Chaohui Zhong, Qian Wang, Yuhua Ruan, Yunfeng Zou, Peiyan Xie, Fumei Wei, Na Xu, Hao Liang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Male circumcision (MC) has been shown to reduce the risk of female to male transmission of HIV. The goal of this survey was to explore the acceptability of MC among the Chinese and to identify factors associated with circumcision preference.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22253919 PMCID: PMC3257276 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic characteristics of 2219 men interviewed in three provinces, western region of China, 2010.
| Variables | No. | Percent |
| Total samples | 2219 | 100.0 |
| Provinces | ||
| Guangxi | 668 | 30.1 |
| Chongqing | 753 | 33.9 |
| Xinjiang | 798 | 36.0 |
| Age | ||
| 18–25 | 549 | 24.7 |
| 25–35 | 685 | 30.9 |
| Over 35 | 985 | 44.4 |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 1319 | 59.4 |
| Never married | 858 | 38.7 |
| Divorced/separated/widowed | 42 | 1.9 |
| Education level | ||
| Junior school or below | 600 | 27.0 |
| High school or above | 1619 | 73.0 |
| Employment status | ||
| Employed | 1779 | 80.2 |
| Unemployed | 440 | 19.8 |
| Smoking | ||
| Yes | 1053 | 47.5 |
| No | 1166 | 52.5 |
| Drinking | ||
| Yes | 741 | 33.4 |
| No | 1478 | 1478 |
| Had sexual intercourse in the past 3 months | ||
| Yes | 1807 | 81.4 |
| No | 412 | 18.6 |
| Condom use | ||
| Consistent use | 407 | 22.6 |
| Inconsistent use | 897 | 49.6 |
| Never use | 503 | 27.8 |
Reasons to be accept or refuse MC among the Chinese men.
| Frequency | Percent | |
|
| 989 | 100.0 |
| Improve female partners' hygiene | 596 | 60.3 |
| Redundant foreskin | 587 | 59.4 |
| Prevention of penile cancer | 496 | 50.2 |
| Protection against HIV and STDs | 338 | 34.2 |
| Enhance sexual pleasure | 409 | 41.4 |
| Better penile appearance | 109 | 11.0 |
| Traditional or religious reason | 38 | 3.8 |
|
| 1230 | 100.0 |
| Not necessary or not effective | 997 | 81.1 |
| Concern about potential danger associated with surgery | 162 | 13.2 |
| Concern about reducing sexual ability | 128 | 10.4 |
| Concern about expensive surgery cost | 70 | 5.7 |
Factors associated with the willingness to be circumcised.
| Variables | WTC groupn (%) | Non-WTC groupn (%) | χ2 |
|
| Can MC prevent penile inflammation and cancer? | 38.09 | 0.000 | ||
| Yes | 438(44.3) | 388(31.5) | ||
| No | 551(55.7) | 842(68.5) | ||
| Can MC prevent AIDS and STDs? | ||||
| Yes | 254(25.7) | 223(18.1) | 18.53 | 0.000 |
| No | 735(74.3) | 1007(81.9) | ||
| Can MC improve sexual partners' hygiene? | 53.55 | 0.000 | ||
| Yes | 540(54.6) | 480(39.0) | ||
| No | 449(45.4) | 750(61.0) | ||
| Can MC enhance sexual pleasure in the future? | 29.92 | 0.000 | ||
| Yes | 356(36.0) | 311(25.3) | ||
| No | 633(64.0) | 919(74.7) | ||
| Can MC improve penile appearance? | 7.41 | 0.006 | ||
| Yes | 620(10.4) | 88(7.2) | ||
| No | 369(89.6) | 1142(92.8) | ||
| Can redundant foreskin be hazardous? | 59.43 | 0.000 | ||
| Yes | 891(90.1) | 957(77.8) | ||
| No | 98(9.9) | 273(22.2) | ||
| Whether or not your friends underwent MC | 121.97 | 0.000 | ||
| Yes | 620(62.7) | 481(39.1) | ||
| No | 369(37.3) | 749(60.9) | ||
| Do you feel that your foreskin is redundant or too long? | ||||
| Yes | 440(44.5) | 50(4.1) | 520.66 | 0.000 |
| No | 549(55.5) | 1180(95.9) | ||
| Ever had sexual intercourse? | 5.51 | 0.019 | ||
| Yes | 784(79.3) | 1023(83.2) | ||
| No | 205(20.7) | 207(16.8) |
Multivariate analysis of willingness to be circumcised among 2219 men interviewed.
| Variables | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | P value |
| Province | ||
| Guangxi | 1.00 | |
| Chongqing | 2.46(1.86∼3.25) | 0.000 |
| Xinjiang | 3.69(2.78∼4.91) | 0.000 |
| Age | ||
| Over 35 | 1.00 | |
| 25–35 | 1.01(0.82∼1.22) | 0.950 |
| 18–25 | 1.60 (1.30∼1.98) | 0.000 |
| Can redundant foreskin be hazardous? | ||
| No | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 1.78(1.31∼2.43) | 0.000 |
| Whether or not your friends underwent MC | ||
| No | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 1.36(1.10∼1.70) | 0.006 |
| Do you feel that your foreskin is redundant or too long? | ||
| No | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 15.98(11.62∼21.99) | 0.000 |